Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration

The increasing potential and practice of collecting, analysing and using student data necessitates that higher education institutions (HEIs) critically examine their assumptions, paradigms and practices regarding student data. There is a real danger that some current approaches to learning analytics within higher education ignore the fiduciary duty of HEIs and the impact and scope of the asymmetrical power relationship between students and the institution. In the light of increasing concerns regarding surveillance, higher education cannot afford a simple paternalistic approach to the use of student data. Very few HEIs have regulatory frameworks in place and/or share information with students regarding the scope of data that may be collected, analysed, used and shared. It is clear from literature that basic opting in or opting out does not sufficiently allow for many of the complex issues in the nexus of privacy, consent, vulnerability and agency. The notion of vulnerability (institutional and individual) allows an interesting and useful lens on the collection and use of student data. Though both institutional and individual vulnerability needs to be considered, this paper focuses specifically on student vulnerability. An earlier framework developed by Prinsloo and Slade provides tentative pointers to consider a range of responses to decrease students’ vulnerability, increase students’ agency and move students as participants in learning analytics from quantified selves to qualified selves.

[1]  K. Crawford,et al.  Big Data and Due Process: Toward a Framework to Redress Predictive Privacy Harms , 2013 .

[2]  Robert Payne,et al.  Frictionless Sharing and Digital Promiscuity , 2014 .

[3]  R. Bernstein.  Opt-In or Opt-Out? , 2011 .

[4]  Alistair Wardrope.  Medicalization and epistemic injustice , 2015, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[5]  Tom Boellstorff,et al.  Making big data, in theory , 2013, First Monday.

[6]  Audrey Watters.  Data is the New Oil: MOOCs, Metaphor, and Money , 2013 .

[7]  George Siemens,et al.  Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning , 2015 .

[8]  Paul Ohm.  Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization , 2009 .

[9]  Laura E. Rumbley,et al.  Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution: A Report Prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education , 2010 .

[10]  Anthony D. Miyazaki,et al.  Internet Privacy and Security: An Examination of Online Retailer Disclosures , 2000 .

[11]  Omer Tene,et al.  Big Data for All: Privacy and User Control in the Age of Analytics , 2012 .

[12]  William E. Knight,et al.  The Handbook of Institutional Research , 2012 .

[13]  Alan Rubel,et al.  Student privacy in learning analytics: An information ethics perspective , 2014, Inf. Soc..

[14]  E. Morozov,et al.  To Save Everything, Click Here , 2013 .

[15]  Kate Raynes-Goldie,et al.  Aliases, Creeping, and Wall Cleaning: Understanding Privacy in the Age of Facebook , 2010, First Monday.

[16]  Benjamin Gerber,et al.  Conceptualizing privacy , 2010, CSOC.

[17]  H. J. Smith,et al.  Exploring information privacy regulation, risks, trust, and behavior , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Bernard E. Harcourt,et al.  Exposed: Desire and Disobedience in the Digital Age , 2015 .

[19]  Rebecca Eynon,et al.  The rise of Big Data: what does it mean for education, technology, and media research? , 2013 .

[20]  Frank A. Pasquale.  The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information , 2015 .

[21]  Eric Gossett,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2015 .

[22]  P. Prinsloo,et al.  Educational triage in higher open education: walking a moral tightrope , 2014 .

[23]  Kim Schildkamp,et al.  Data-based decision making in education: challenges and opportunities , 2013 .

[24]  H. Nissenbaum.  A Contextual Approach to Privacy Online , 2011, Daedalus.

[25]  Gary T. Marx,et al.  Personal Information, Borders, and the New Surveillance Studies , 2007 .

[26]  J. Borges,et al.  A TAXONOMY OF PRIVACY , 2006 .

[27]  Paul Prinsloo,et al.  Big(ger) Data as Better Data in Open Distance Learning. , 2015 .

[28]  Ian R. Kerr,et al.  Privacy, Identity and Anonymity , 2012 .

[29]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Privacy in Context - Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life , 2009 .

[30]  Finn Brunton,et al.  Obfuscation: A User's Guide for Privacy and Protest , 2015 .

[31]  Viktor Mayer-Schnberger,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2013 .

[32]  James Mussell.  Raw Data is an Oxymoron , 2014 .

[33]  L. Gitelman.  "Raw Data" Is an Oxymoron , 2013 .

[34]  Seeta Peña Gangadharan,et al.  Digital inclusion and data profiling , 2012, First Monday.

[35]  Paolo Totaro,et al.  The Concept of Algorithm as an Interpretative Key of Modern Rationality , 2014 .

[36]  A. O’Connell.  My Entire Life is Online: Informed Consent, Big Data, and Decolonial Knowledge , 2016 .

[37]  N. Sing,et al.  Theorising research with vulnerable people in higher education : ethical and methodological challenges , 2014 .

[38]  Susan Dodds,et al.  Vulnerability : new essays in ethics and feminist philosophy , 2013 .

[39]  Opt in or opt out , 2007 .

[40]  Zygmunt Bauman,et al.  Liquid Times Living in an Age of Uncertainty , 2006 .

[41]  Deborah Lupton,et al.  You Are Your Data: Self-Tracking Practices and Concepts of Data , 2014 .

[42]  D. Boyd,et al.  Six Provocations for Big Data , 2011 .

[43]  Kingsley Dennis,et al.  Viewpoint: Keeping a Close Watch – The Rise of Self-Surveillance and the Threat of Digital Exposure , 2008 .

[44]  J. Lanier.  How should we think about privacy , 2013 .

[45]  A. Westin.  Social and Political Dimensions of Privacy , 2003 .

[46]  Paul Ohm.  Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Changing the Rules: General Principles for Data Use and Analysis , 2014 .

[47]  Martha Albertson Fineman,et al.  The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition , 2008 .

[48]  T. Hardjono,et al.  Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: The New Deal on Data: A Framework for Institutional Controls , 2014 .

[49]  Paul Prinsloo,et al.  Turning the tide: a socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa , 2011 .

[50]  Ryan S. Baker,et al.  Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics , 2014 .

[51]  P. Elias.  Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: A European Perspective on Research and Big Data Analysis , 2014 .

[52]  S. Fender.  The New York Review of Books , 1986 .

[53]  Sean Brian.  The Unexamined Life in the Era of Big Data: Toward a UDAAP for Data , 2014 .

[54]  Paul Prinsloo,et al.  Student privacy self-management: implications for learning analytics , 2015, LAK.

[55]  David Lyon,et al.  Theorizing surveillance : the panopticon and beyond , 2006 .

[56]  R. Ericson,et al.  The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility , 2006 .

[57]  James E. Willis,et al.  Ethical oversight of student data in learning analytics: a typology derived from a cross-continental, cross-institutional perspective , 2016 .

[58]  G. Marx.  Murky conceptual waters: The public and the private , 2001, Ethics and Information Technology.

[59]  Rolf H. Weber,et al.  The digital future - A challenge for privacy? , 2015, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[60]  Daniel J. Solove,et al.  Privacy and Power: Computer Databases and Metaphors for Information Privacy , 2001 .

[61]  K. Crawford.  The Hidden Biases in Big Data , 2013 .

[62]  Daniel J. Solove,et al.  'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy , 2007 .

[63]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  On site: to opt-in or opt-out?: it depends on the question , 2001, CACM.

[64]  Viktor Mayer-Schönberger,et al.  Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age , 2009 .

[65]  D. Lyon.  The Snowden Stakes: Challenges for Understanding Surveillance Today , 2015 .

[66]  P. Prinsloo,et al.  Learning Analytics , 2013 .

[67]  Daniel J. Solove,et al.  Introduction: Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma , 2013 .

[68]  Paul Henman,et al.  Targeted! Population segmentation, electronic surveillance and governing the unemployed in Australia , 2004 .

[69]  Kent K. Curtis.  The "CRISIS" in higher education , 1971, SCOU.

[70]  Daniel J. Solove.  The Digital Person , 2022 .