High-resolution spiral CT of the breast at very low dose: concept and feasibility considerations

[1]  John M Boone,et al.  Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[2]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Gisella Gennaro,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study , 2010, European Radiology.

[4]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[5]  R. Cloutier.  Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. , 1989 .

[6]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[7]  Kenneth G. A. Gilhuijs,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results , 2009, European Radiology.

[8]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[9]  Daniel Kolditz,et al.  Volume-of-interest (VOI) imaging in C-arm flat-detector CT for high image quality at reduced dose. , 2010, Medical physics.

[10]  A. Elster,et al.  Risk of Radiation-induced Breast Cancer from Mammographic Screening , 2012 .

[11]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  Effects of adaptive section collimation on patient radiation dose in multisection spiral CT. , 2009, Radiology.

[12]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  Spectral optimization for dedicated breast CT. , 2010, Medical physics.

[14]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[16]  F. Beekma,et al.  Ordered subset reconstruction for x-ray CT. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  What should the burden of proof be for acceptance of a new breast-cancer screening technique? , 2004, The Lancet.

[18]  André Wambersie,et al.  The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements , 2001, Journal of the ICRU.

[19]  M J Yaffe,et al.  The myth of the 50-50 breast. , 2009, Medical physics.

[20]  R. Fimmers,et al.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Constantine Gatsonis,et al.  Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  E. Andreopoulou,et al.  An overview of the status of imaging screening technology for breast cancer. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[23]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype. , 2010, Medical physics.

[24]  F. Hall.  The rise and impending decline of screening mammography. , 2008, Radiology.

[25]  T R Nelson,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[26]  Consumer Protection,et al.  European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.