Refractive Effect of Reversed Implantation of Angled-Haptic Lens Implants

Background: To study the refractive effect of reversed implantation of intraocular lenses. Methods: Trigonometric calculations were used to calculate the extent of forward displacement of the optic for various lens designs available commercially. The SRK formula was used to estimate the relationship of axial length to the refractive power of the eye, with other variables remaining constant. Results: The theoretical effect of a displaced posterior-chamber implant due to flipped insertion can vary from 1.46 dpt for a 12.5-mm diameter lens with an optic diameter of 6 mm (or a 13-mm diameter lens with an optic diameter of 6.5 mm) and a haptic angle of 5° to 3.15 dpt for a 12.5-mm diameter lens with an optic diameter of 5.5 mm (or a 13-mm lens with an optic diameter of 6 mm) and a haptic angle of 10°. Conclusions: There has been no study on the refractive effect of axial lens displacement due to a reversed implantation of a lens with a hinged haptic. This study identifies the major determinants (namely the haptic length and haptic angle) and gives an estimate of the effect on final refraction for each lens type commonly used when they are implanted on the reverse.

[1]  K. Hoffer Hoffer barrier ridge concept. , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  Y. Hara,et al.  Dioptric changes in eyes with reversed intraocular lenses , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  Y. Hara,et al.  Long-term observation of the refraction with a reversed-optic posterior chamber intraocular lens. , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  C. Suto,et al.  Adjusting intraocular lens power for sulcus fixation , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  J. Holladay,et al.  Ultrasonographic measurement of induced myopia associated with capsular bag distention syndrome. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[6]  P. Padmanabhan,et al.  In situ tumbling of the AcrySof intraocular lens. , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  S. Gallagher,et al.  Refractive error consequences of reversed-optic AMO SI-40NB intraocular lens. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[8]  D. Sanders,et al.  Comparison of the accuracy of the Binkhorst, Colenbrander, and SRK implant power prediction formulas. , 1981, Journal - American Intra-Ocular Implant Society.

[9]  H. Bayramlar,et al.  Myopic shift from the predicted refraction after sulcus fixation of PMMA posterior chamber intraocular lenses. , 2006, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.