Spatial interference management with hierarchical precoding in ultra-dense heterogeneous networks

In this work we focus on ultra-dense heterogeneous networks which are one of the key-concepts to increase the spectral efficiency for future mobile networks. Therefore, macro and small cells are operating on the same frequencies to increase the reuse of the spectrum. With this, interference caused by the macro toward users attached to the small cells becomes the limiting performance factor. Aiming for ultra-dense networks with many small cells, also interference from the small-cells to macro-attached, and other small-cell users has an impact which cannot be neglected. To cope with this challenge we use a novel two-stage hierarchical precoding/beamforming approach to protect small-cell users from macro-interference, while still serving macro-users at the same time. In doing so, Channel State Information (CSI) at the transmitter (CSIT) between the macro and small-cell users is required at the macro cell. We adapted an iterative Interference Alignment (IA) algorithm operating in the common null space of the macro-users to ensure interference decoupling of macro and small cell users. All the processing is done at the macro Base Station (BS) allowing independent transmission of the small-cells. This means no further feedback, information (e.g. precoder) or user data exchange between transmit nodes is required.

[1]  Lars Thiele,et al.  Hierarchical precoding for ultra-dense heterogeneous networks , 2014, 2014 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[2]  Preben E. Mogensen,et al.  The Inter-Cell Interference Dilemma in Dense Outdoor Small Cell Deployment , 2014, 2014 IEEE 79th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[3]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Massive MIMO: An Introduction , 2015, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[4]  Martin Haardt,et al.  Zero-forcing methods for downlink spatial multiplexing in multiuser MIMO channels , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Cooperative Algorithms for MIMO Interference Channels , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  Mikko Valkama,et al.  Spectral and energy efficiency of ultra-dense networks under different deployment strategies , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Interference Alignment and Spatial Degrees of Freedom for the K User Interference Channel , 2007, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[8]  Makis Stamatelatos,et al.  Rethinking the mobile and wireless network architecture: The METIS research into 5G , 2014, 2014 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC).

[9]  Gerd Zimmermann,et al.  METIS research advances towards the 5G mobile and wireless system definition , 2015, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[10]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Noncooperative Cellular Wireless with Unlimited Numbers of Base Station Antennas , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[12]  Lars Thiele,et al.  QuaDRiGa: A 3-D Multi-Cell Channel Model With Time Evolution for Enabling Virtual Field Trials , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[13]  Junyi Li,et al.  Network densification: the dominant theme for wireless evolution into 5G , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Interference alignment via alternating minimization , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[15]  Lars Thiele,et al.  Massive MIMO for interference management in heterogeneous networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE 8th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM).