Adverse Effects of Patent Pooling on Product Development and Commercialization

The conventional antitrust wisdom is that the formation of patent pools is welfare en- hancing when patents are complementary, since the pool avoids a double-marginalization problem associated with independent licensing. The focus of this paper is on (down- stream) product development and commercialization on the basis of perfectly comple- mentary patents. We consider development technologies that entail spillovers between rivals, and assume that nal demand products are imperfect substitutes. When pool formation facilitates information sharing and either increases spillovers in development or decreases the degree of product di erentiation, patent pools can adversely a ect welfare by reducing the incentives towards product development and product mar- ket competition|even with perfectly complementary patents. This modi es and even negates the conventional wisdom for some settings and suggests why patent pools are uncommon in science-based industries such as biotech and pharmaceuticals, despite there being frequent policy advocacy for them.

[1]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Price-Dependent Demand in Spatial Models , 2012 .

[2]  Petra Moser,et al.  Do Patent Pools Encourage Innovation? Evidence from 20 U.S. Industries Under the New Deal , 2012 .

[3]  Ulrich Schwalbe,et al.  Economic principles of state aid control , 2011 .

[4]  Joseph A. Clougherty,et al.  Using rival effects to identify synergies and improve merger typologies , 2010 .

[5]  Patrick Gaulé,et al.  Towards Patent Pools in Biotechnology? , 2006 .

[6]  Roman Inderst,et al.  Countervailing power and dynamic efficiency , 2011 .

[7]  Julia Graf,et al.  The effects of rebate contracts on the health care system , 2014, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[8]  N. Gallini.  Private Agreements for Coordinating Patent Rights : the Case of Patent Pools. , 2011 .

[9]  E. Muller,et al.  Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels , 1992 .

[10]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  Vertical Mergers, Foreclosure and Raising Rivals' Costs – Experimental Evidence , 2011 .

[11]  Sung-Hwan Kim,et al.  Vertical Structure and Patent Pools , 2004 .

[12]  J. Tirole,et al.  Efficient Patent Pools , 2002 .

[13]  Optimal formation rules for patent pools , 2009 .

[14]  Annika Herr,et al.  Pharmaceutical prices under regulation: Tiered co-payments and reference pricing in Germany , 2012 .

[15]  Gerhard Riener,et al.  Heterogeneous treatment effects in groups , 2013 .

[16]  Dragan Jovanovic,et al.  Investment behavior in a constrained dictator game , 2012 .

[17]  Christian Wey,et al.  On the role of consumer expectations in markets with network effects , 2012 .

[18]  Geertrui Van Overwalle.  Uncorking Trade Secrets: Sparking the Interaction Between Trade Secrecy and Open Biotechnology , 2010 .

[19]  Amol M. Joshi,et al.  When do strategic alliances inhibit innovation by firms? Evidence from patent pools in the global optical disc industry , 2011 .

[20]  Torben Stühmeier,et al.  Roaming and investments in the mobile internet market , 2012 .

[21]  Tomaso Duso,et al.  Collusion Through Joint R&D: An Empirical Assessment , 2010, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[22]  Gordon J. Klein,et al.  Bargaining power and local heroes , 2013 .

[23]  Hodaka Morita,et al.  Competitor Collaboration and Product Distinctiveness , 2007 .

[24]  J. Choi,et al.  Patent Pools and Cross-Licensing in the Shadow of Patent Litigation , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  Tim Friehe,et al.  Private Protection Against Crime When Property Value is Private Information , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  Ulrich Heimeshoff,et al.  The extent of European power markets , 2014 .

[27]  Tim Friehe,et al.  Cheap Talk About the Detection Probability , 2012 .

[28]  Stefano Trento,et al.  Patent policy, patent pools, and the accumulation of claims in sequential innovation , 2012 .

[29]  Yann Ménière,et al.  Patent Law and Complementary Innovations , 2008 .

[30]  Deborah F. Minehart,et al.  Optimal Technology Sharing Strategies in Dynamic Games of R&D , 2014 .

[31]  Stefan Haigner,et al.  The first shall be last: serial position effects in the case contestants evaluate each other , 2010 .

[32]  Marc Bourreau,et al.  Cooperation in Product Development and Process R&D Between Competitors , 2007 .

[33]  Tobias Regner,et al.  Voluntary payments, privacy and social pressure on the Internet: A natural field experiment , 2012 .

[34]  Ping Lin,et al.  Product differentiation, process R&D, and the nature of market competition , 2002 .

[35]  Klaus M. Schmidt.  Complementary Patents and Market Structure , 2008 .

[36]  K. Heyer.  Welfare Standards and Merger Analysis: Why Not the Best? , 2013 .

[37]  Justus Haucap,et al.  Consumer Behavior towards On-net/Off-net Price Differentiation , 2011 .

[38]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  A Within-Subject Analysis of Other-Regarding Preferences , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[39]  Clémence Christin,et al.  Entry Deterrence Through Cooperative R&D Over-Investment , 2013 .

[40]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[41]  Sergei Severinov,et al.  On Information Sharing and Incentives in R&D , 2001 .

[42]  Dragan Jovanovic,et al.  An equilibrium analysis of efficiency gains from mergers , 2012 .

[43]  Michael L. Katz,et al.  The Economics of Welfare Standards in Antitrust , 2006 .

[44]  Ulrich Heimeshoff,et al.  First mover advantages in mobile telecommunications: Evidence from OECD countries , 2012 .

[45]  Georg Clemens,et al.  Rebels without a clue? Experimental evidence on partial cartels , 2013 .

[46]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[47]  Petra Moser,et al.  Do Patent Pools Encourage Innovation? Evidence from the Nineteenth-Century Sewing Machine Industry , 2010, The Journal of Economic History.

[48]  Vianney Dequiedt,et al.  Patent pools and dynamic R&D incentives , 2013 .

[49]  Jay Pil Choi,et al.  Cooperative R&D with product market competition , 1993 .

[50]  Annika Herr,et al.  Quality and Welfare in a Mixed Duopoly with Regulated Prices: The Case of a Public and a Private Hospital , 2011 .

[51]  R. Gilbert.  Ties That Bind: Policies to Promote (Good) Patent Pools , 2009 .

[52]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Deregulation of Shopping Hours: The Impact on Independent Retailers and Chain Stores , 2011 .

[53]  Marc Bataille,et al.  Intermodal competition on some routes in transportation networks: The case of inter urban buses and railways , 2013 .

[54]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation , 1998 .

[55]  Mehmet Karaçuka,et al.  A comparative analysis of alternative univariate time series models in forecasting Turkish inflation , 2012 .

[56]  Mehmet Karaçuka,et al.  The bank lending channel in Turkey: has it changed after the low-inflation regime? , 2012 .

[57]  Dragan Jovanovic,et al.  Competition in Germany s Minute Reserve Power Market : An Econometric Analysis , 2009 .

[58]  Irene Bertschek,et al.  More Bits – More Bucks? Measuring the Impact of Broadband Internet on Firm Performance , 2013 .

[59]  Fatima Lambarraa,et al.  On the Norms of Charitable Giving in Islam: A Field Experiment , 2012 .

[60]  N. Jentzsch,et al.  Targeted pricing and customer data sharing among rivals , 2013 .

[61]  Birgit Verbeure.  Gene Patents and Collaborative Licensing Models: Patent pooling for gene-based diagnostic testing. Conceptual framework , 2009 .

[62]  Justus Haucap,et al.  On File Sharing With Indirect Network Effects Between Concert Ticket Sales and Music Recordings , 2012 .

[63]  R. Pittman,et al.  Consumer Surplus as the Appropriate Standard for Antitrust Enforcement , 2007 .

[64]  Rabah Amir,et al.  Noncooperative versus cooperative R&D with endogenous spillover rates , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[65]  Mehmet Karaçuka,et al.  Consumer choice and local network effects in mobile telecommunications in Turkey , 2013 .

[66]  Jean-Philippe Nicolaï,et al.  The Role of Abatement Technologies for Allocating Free Allowances , 2011 .

[67]  Ralf Dewenter,et al.  Calling Party Pays or Receiving Party Pays? The Diffusion of Mobile Telephony with Endogenous Regulation , 2005 .

[68]  Massimo Motta,et al.  Cooperative R&D and vertical product differentiation , 1992 .

[69]  Ulrich Heimeshoff,et al.  Pull-forward effects in the German car scrappage scheme: A time series approach , 2012 .

[70]  Ralf Dewenter,et al.  Semi-collusion in media markets , 2011 .

[71]  Ralf Dewenter,et al.  More Ads, More Revs? Is there a Media Bias in the Likelihood to be Reviewed? , 2012 .

[72]  Volker Benndorf,et al.  Competition in the Workplace: An Experimental Investigation , 2012 .

[73]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[74]  A. Barth,et al.  Does the growth of mobile markets cause the demise of fixed networks? - Evidence from the European Union , 2014 .

[75]  Richard J. Gilbert,et al.  Antitrust for Patent Pools: A Century of Policy Evolution , 2004 .

[76]  Paolo Buccirossi,et al.  Competition Policy and Productivity Growth: An Empirical Assessment , 2009 .

[77]  Thomas D. Jeitschko,et al.  Signaling in deterministic and stochastic settings , 2012 .

[78]  Hans Christian Müller,et al.  Forecast Errors in Undisclosed Management Sales Forecasts: The Disappearance of the Overoptimism Bias , 2011 .

[79]  Petra Moser,et al.  Do Patent Pools Encourage Innovation? Evidence from the 19th-Century Sewing Machine Industry , 2009 .

[80]  X. Vives,et al.  Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly , 1984 .

[81]  Claudia Keser,et al.  Technology adoption in markets with network effects: Theory and experimental evidence , 2012, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[82]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Transparency, price-dependent demand and product variety , 2011 .

[83]  Endogenous Formation of Competitive Research Sharing Joint Ventures , 2000 .

[84]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Getting beer during commercials: Adverse effects of ad-avoidance , 2011, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[85]  Torben Stühmeier,et al.  Access regulation with asymmetric termination costs , 2013 .

[86]  M. Katz,et al.  Efficient division of profits from complementary innovations , 2011 .

[87]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  The impact of the termination rule on cooperation in a prisoner’s dilemma experiment , 2011, International Journal of Game Theory.

[88]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Regulating Advertising in the Presence of Public Service Broadcasting , 2012 .

[89]  Miguel A. Fonseca,et al.  Explicit vs. Tacit Collusion – The Impact of Communication in Oligopoly Experiments , 2012 .

[90]  Michael Berlemann,et al.  Which Factors Drive the Decision to Boycott and Opt Out of Research Rankings? A Note , 2012 .

[91]  Isabel Teichmann,et al.  The Strategic Use of Private Quality Standards in Food Supply Chains , 2011 .

[92]  Christian Kellner,et al.  The Effect of Ambiguity Aversion on Reward Scheme Choice , 2014 .

[93]  B. Balsmeier,et al.  Outside board memberships of CEOs: Expertise or entrenchment? , 2011 .

[94]  Augustin M. Cournot.  Cournot, Antoine Augustin: Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses , 2019, Die 100 wichtigsten Werke der Ökonomie.

[95]  S. Vanneste,et al.  Patent pools and clearinghouses in the life sciences , 2011, Trends in Biotechnology.

[96]  Justus Haucap,et al.  The Effects of Gasoline Price Regulations: Experimental Evidence , 2013 .

[97]  Michael L. Katz,et al.  An Analysis of Cooperative Research and Development , 1986 .

[98]  Suzanne L. Holcombe.  United States Patent and Trademark Office , 2008 .

[99]  A. Barth,et al.  Irrationality rings! - Experimental evidence on mobile tariff choices , 2011 .

[100]  B. Lyons,et al.  Could Politicians Be More Right Than Economists? A Theory of Merger Standards , 2003 .

[101]  David K. Levine,et al.  Against Intellectual Monopoly , 2008 .

[102]  Christian Wey,et al.  The Effects of Remedies on Merger Activity in Oligopoly , 2012 .

[103]  Ron D. Katznelson,et al.  Inventing-Around Edison's Incandescent Lamp Patent: Evidence of Patents’ Role in Stimulating Downstream Development and Competition , 2013 .

[104]  Mehmet Karacuka,et al.  A Spatial Approach To Measure Productivity Spillovers Of Foreign Affiliated Firms In Turkish Manufacturing Industries , 2012 .

[105]  Vicente Orts,et al.  Cooperative R&D with Endogenous Technology Differentiation , 2004 .

[106]  Mehmet Karaçuka,et al.  Competition in Turkish mobile telecommunications markets: Price elasticities and network substitution , 2011 .

[107]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  Excess Capacity and Pricing in Bertrand-Edgeworth Markets: Experimental Evidence , 2013 .