Abstract Microfabrications of polymer are becoming increasingly important and considered as a low-cost alternative to the silicon or glass-based Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) technologies. In this study, micromolding via both microinjection molding and hot embossing were applied to microfeatured fluidic platform used for DNA/RNA test. LIGA like processes were used to prepare silicon-based SU-8 photoresist followed by electroforming for making Ni–Co based stamp. The microfeature in the stamp consists of microchannel array of approximately 27 μm in depth and 110 μm in width. A polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) film of 1 mm thickness was used as a hot embossing substrate and PMMA resin was also used as the injection molding material. Effect of various molding conditions on the replication accuracy of microfeatures was investigated. The width and depth of microchannels within molded devices were measured and analyzed. For hot embossed device, it was found that applied pressure and embossing temperature are the two key parameters affecting molding accuracy significantly. The accuracies of the imprint width and depth increased with the applied pressure until the associated dimensions reached saturated values. Embossing temperature shows similar influence on the accuracies of imprint depth and width as the applied pressure. As for microinjection molded devices, the accuracies of the imprint width and depth increased with increasing mold temperature, melt temperature, injection velocity and packing pressure within regular processing window. Basically, both micromoldings can achieve the molding accuracies requirement for microchannels. Compared with hot embossing, microinjection molding shows a slight advantage in the replication of depth of microchannel but is poor in width. The cycle time of hot embossing is significantly longer than that of microinjection molding.
[1]
Holger Becker,et al.
Microfluidic devices for μ-TAS applications fabricated by polymer hot embossing
,
1998,
Photonics West - Micro and Nano Fabricated Electromechanical and Optical Components.
[2]
H. Becker,et al.
Silicon as tool material for polymer hot embossing
,
1999,
Technical Digest. IEEE International MEMS 99 Conference. Twelfth IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (Cat. No.99CH36291).
[3]
R. Maeda,et al.
Micro Hot Embossing for Replication of Microstructures
,
2002,
2002 International Microprocesses and Nanotechnology Conference, 2002. Digest of Papers..
[4]
R. McCormick,et al.
Microchannel electrophoretic separations of DNA in injection-molded plastic substrates.
,
1997,
Analytical chemistry.
[5]
M. Heckele,et al.
Review on micro molding of thermoplastic polymers
,
2004
.
[6]
M. T. Gale.
Replication techniques for diffractive optical elements
,
1997
.
[7]
Hella-Christin Scheer,et al.
Polymer issues in nanoimprinting technique
,
1999
.
[8]
Kurt W. Koelling,et al.
Hot embossing in microfabrication. Part I: Experimental
,
2002
.
[9]
Jianhong Zhao,et al.
Effects of process parameters on the micro molding process
,
2003
.
[10]
Holger Becker,et al.
Hot embossing as a method for the fabrication of polymer high aspect ratio structures
,
2000
.
[11]
A Manz,et al.
Developments in technology and applications of microsystems.
,
1997,
Current opinion in chemical biology.
[12]
J.-H. Chang,et al.
Gas pressurized hot embossing for transcription of micro-features
,
2003
.
[13]
G. Whitesides,et al.
Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane).
,
1998,
Analytical chemistry.