Communication Science for Science Communication: Water Management for Oil and Natural Gas Extraction

AbstractWater management for oil and natural gas extraction in the United States has become a topic of public interest and concern. This societal relevance simultaneously heightens the need for rig...

[1]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Communicating science in social settings , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Sara K. Yeo,et al.  The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[3]  Robert M. Gerst.  The risks and advantages of framing science. , 2007, Science.

[4]  A. Lupia.  Communicating science in politicized environments , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Michel J. J. Handgraaf,et al.  The psychology of climate change communication: a guide for scientists, journalists, educators, political aides, and the interested public , 2009 .

[6]  J. Besley,et al.  Scientists' Views about Communication Training. , 2015 .

[7]  Above the din but in the fray: environmental scientists as effective advocates , 2010 .

[8]  N. Ulibarri.  Tracing Process to Performance of Collaborative Governance: A Comparative Case Study of Federal Hydropower Licensing , 2015 .

[9]  Katharine H. Greenaway,et al.  Shared Identity Is Key to Effective Communication , 2015, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[10]  R. Jackson,et al.  The Environmental Costs and Benefits of Fracking , 2014 .

[11]  R. Jackson,et al.  Impacts of shale gas wastewater disposal on water quality in western Pennsylvania. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Communicating with the public: opportunities and rewards for individual ecologists , 2010 .

[13]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Social Learning and Water Resources Management , 2007 .

[14]  B. Trench,et al.  Policies and practices in supporting scientists’ public communication through training , 2012 .

[15]  A. Hopkins,et al.  Thinking About Process Safety Indicators , 2007 .

[16]  D. Dzombak,et al.  Water Management Challenges Associated with the Production of Shale Gas by Hydraulic Fracturing , 2011 .

[17]  Carina Cortassa.  In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? The eternal recurrence of the public deficit , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[18]  Chris Mooney,et al.  Framing Science , 2007, Science.

[19]  Jeffrey Jacquet,et al.  Review of risks to communities from shale energy development. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  J. Besley,et al.  Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement , 2016, PloS one.

[21]  Jason Priem,et al.  How and why scholars cite on Twitter , 2010, ASIST.

[22]  G. Theodori,et al.  Hydraulic fracturing: Assessing self-reported familiarity and the contributions of selected sources to self-reported knowledge , 2017 .

[23]  John C. Besley,et al.  Qualitative Interviews With Science Communication Trainers About Communication Objectives and Goals , 2016 .

[24]  Anthony Dudo,et al.  The “Science” of Science Communication , 2013 .

[25]  J. Lubchenco.  Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science , 1998 .

[26]  Vincent C Tidwell,et al.  Cooperative modeling: linking science, communication, and ground water planning. , 2008, Ground water.

[27]  Jerome Belli Priscoli.  Public Involvement, Conflict Management: Means to EQ and Social Objectives , 1989 .

[28]  E. Grubert,et al.  Water Use in the Oil and Gas Industries: An Evaluation of Best Practices for Communicating with Scientists, Policymakers, and the Public , 2017 .

[29]  T. Allen,et al.  Dragnet Ecology—“Just the Facts, Ma'am”: The Privilege of Science in a Postmodern World , 2001 .

[30]  Kate Burningham,et al.  Renewable Energy and Sociotechnical Change: Imagined Subjectivities of ‘the Public’ and Their Implications , 2010 .

[31]  A L Greer,et al.  The State of the Art Versus the State of the Science: The Diffusion of New Medical Technologies into Practice , 1988, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[32]  Stuart J Khan,et al.  Managing produced water from coal seam gas projects: implications for an emerging industry in Australia , 2015, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[33]  Bridget R. Scanlon,et al.  Will water scarcity in semiarid regions limit hydraulic fracturing of shale plays? , 2014 .

[34]  B. Suldovsky.  In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influences , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[35]  T. Lynam,et al.  A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management , 2007 .

[36]  T. M. Kashner,et al.  Effectiveness of psychiatric intervention with somatization disorder patients: improved outcomes at reduced costs. , 1994, General hospital psychiatry.

[37]  D. Blockstein,et al.  How to Lose Your Political Virginity while Keeping Your Scientific Credibility , 2002 .

[38]  J. Gilbert,et al.  Identifying the Essential Elements of Effective Science Communication: What do the experts say? , 2012 .

[39]  Melanie R. Roberts.  Realizing Societal Benefit from Academic Research: Analysis of the National Science Foundation’s Broader Impacts Criterion , 2009 .

[40]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music? , 2006, Public Health Genomics.

[41]  Andrew Hopkins,et al.  Reply to comments , 2009 .

[42]  E. Rasch,et al.  Hydraulic fracturing, energy transition and political engagement in the Netherlands: The energetics of citizenship , 2016 .

[43]  Desheng Hu,et al.  Opportunity, challenges and policy choices for China on the development of shale gas , 2013 .

[44]  S. Schneider.  The role of the university in interdisciplinary global change research: Structural constraints and the potential for change. An editorial , 1992 .

[45]  J. Olden,et al.  Practical Science Communication Strategies for Graduate Students , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[46]  P. Weingart,et al.  Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media , 2000 .

[47]  E. Grubert,et al.  Carbon Offsets in California: Science in the Policy Development Process , 2016 .

[48]  Ben J. M. Ale.  More thinking about process safety indicators , 2009 .

[49]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Bringing values and deliberation to science communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Liba Pejchar,et al.  Using Twitter to communicate conservation science from a professional conference , 2016, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[52]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  “Fracking” Controversy and Communication: Using National Survey Data to Understand Public Perceptions of Hydraulic Fracturing , 2014 .

[53]  Frans J. Meijman,et al.  Dialogue guides awareness and understanding of science: an essay on different goals of dialogue leading to different science communication approaches , 2008 .

[54]  How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010-2012? , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[55]  J. Vucetich,et al.  On Advocacy by Environmental Scientists: What, Whether, Why, and How , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[56]  Stephen B. Gruber,et al.  Clinical Epidemiology: The Architecture of Clinical Research , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[57]  Gabrielle Wong-Parodi,et al.  Team science for science communication , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. , 2009, American journal of botany.

[59]  Alexander L. Davis,et al.  A decision science approach for integrating social science in climate and energy solutions , 2016 .

[60]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  The sciences of science communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  A. Bostrom,et al.  Assessing what to address in science communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Gene L. Theodori,et al.  Public Perception of Desalinated Water from Oil and Gas Field Operations: Data from Texas , 2009 .

[63]  L. Eisner,et al.  Felt seismicity associated with shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The first documented example in Europe , 2014 .

[64]  S. Ge,et al.  Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection , 2014, Science.

[65]  D. Lach,et al.  Advocacy and Credibility of Ecological Scientists in Resource Decisionmaking: A Regional Study , 2003 .

[66]  Kim de Rijke,et al.  Unconventional gas developments and the politics of risk and knowledge in Australia , 2016 .

[67]  Robert T. Lackey,et al.  Science, Scientists, and Policy Advocacy , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[68]  E. Rykiel.  Scientific Objectivity, Value Systems, and Policymaking , 2001 .

[69]  R. Clark,et al.  Roles of research scientists in natural resource decision-making , 2001 .