Risk-based input–output analysis of hurricane impacts on interdependent regional workforce systems

Natural disasters, like hurricanes, can damage properties and critical infrastructure systems, degrade economic productivity, and in extreme situations can cause injuries and mortalities. This paper focuses particularly on workforce disruptions in the aftermath of hurricanes. We extend the dynamic inoperability input–output model (DIIM) by formulating a workforce recovery model to identify critical industry sectors. A decision analysis tool is utilized by integrating the economic loss and inoperability metrics to study the interdependent effects of various hurricane intensities on Virginia’s workforce sectors. The extended DIIM and available workforce survey data are incorporated in the decision support tool to simulate various hurricane scenarios. For a low-intensity hurricane scenario, the simulated total economic loss to Virginia’s industry sectors due to workforce absenteeism is around $410 million. Examples of critical sectors that suffer the highest losses for this scenario include: (1) miscellaneous professional, scientific, and technical services; (2) federal general government; (3) state and local government enterprises; (4) construction; and (5) administrative and support services. This paper also explores the inoperability metric, which describes the proportion in which a sector capacity is disrupted. The inoperability metric reveals a different ranking of critical sectors, such as: (1) social assistance; (2) hospitals and nursing and residential care facilities; (3) educational services; (4) federal government enterprises; and (5) federal general government. Results of the study will help identify the critical workforce sectors and can ultimately provide insights into formulating preparedness decisions to expedite disaster recovery. The model was applied to the state of Virginia but can be generalized to other regions and other disaster scenarios.

[1]  Joost R. Santos,et al.  Modeling the Demand Reduction Input‐Output (I‐O) Inoperability Due to Terrorism of Interconnected Infrastructures * , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Nicholas Pinter,et al.  Hazus-MH earthquake modeling in the central USA , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[3]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Inoperability Input-Output Model for Interdependent Infrastructure Sectors. I: Theory and Methodology , 2005 .

[4]  Christopher Mackey,et al.  Development of a prioritization methodology for maintaining Virginia's bridge infrastructure systems , 2009, 2009 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium.

[5]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Managing the risk of terrorism to interdependent infrastructure systems through the dynamic inoperability input–output model , 2006, Syst. Eng..

[6]  Philip J. Schneider,et al.  HAZUS — Its Development and Its Future , 2006 .

[7]  E. Bond,et al.  Risk Analysis for the Security of VDOT Smart Traffic Centers , 2007, 2007 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium.

[8]  Carol Taylor West,et al.  Modeling the Regional Impact of Natural Disaster and Recovery: A General Framework and an Application to Hurricane Andrew , 1994 .

[9]  Y. Haimes,et al.  Leontief-Based Model of Risk in Complex Interconnected Infrastructures , 2001 .

[10]  Mark A. Saunders,et al.  Normalized Hurricane Damage in the United States: 1900–2005 , 2008 .

[11]  Zhenhua Zou,et al.  Influencing factors of households disadvantaged in post-earthquake life recovery: a case study of the Wenchuan earthquake in China , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[12]  Joost R. Santos,et al.  Interdependency analysis with multiple probabilistic sector inputs , 2008 .

[13]  Joost R. Santos,et al.  Developing an inventory-based prioritization methodology for assessing inoperability and economic loss in interdependent sectors , 2011, 2011 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium.

[14]  Ning Lin,et al.  Modeling Extreme Rainfall, Winds, and Surge from Hurricane Isabel (2003) , 2010 .

[15]  James M. Dahlhamer,et al.  Businesses and Disasters: Empirical Patterns and Unanswered Questions , 2000 .

[16]  Yuexin Jiang,et al.  The impact of natural disaster on absenteeism, job satisfaction, and job performance of survival employees: An empirical study of the survivors in Wenchuan Earthquake , 2011 .

[17]  J. Elsner,et al.  Florida Hurricanes and Damage Costs , 2009 .

[18]  W. Leontief,et al.  The structure of American economy, 1919-1929 : an empirical application of equilibrium analysis , 1942 .

[19]  Joost R. Santos,et al.  INOPERABILITY INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL 2 . 1 . Background : Leontief Input-Output Model , 2005 .

[20]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Modeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters , 2004 .

[21]  Edward N. Rappaport,et al.  THE DEADLIEST, COSTLIEST, AND MOST INTENSE UNITED STATES TROPICAL CYCLONES FROM 1851 TO 2004 (AND OTHER FREQUENTLY REQUESTED HURRICANE FACTS) , 2005 .

[22]  Yacov Y Haimes,et al.  Systemic Valuation of Strategic Preparedness Through Application of the Inoperability Input‐Output Model with Lessons Learned from Hurricane Katrina , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  W. Leontief.  Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States , 1936 .

[24]  Christopher F. Dumas,et al.  Impact of Low-Intensity Hurricanes on Regional Economic Activity , 2002 .