In order for the mobile networks to stay connected to the Internet, Network Mobility (NEMO) is involved with the management of the different types of movements by mobile routers during rapid changes of the Point of Attachment (PoA). Accordingly to achieve seamless handoff with lower delay and packet loss in NEMO environment, it is very important to get better performance of mobility management protocol. As the main idea of Network Mobility Basic Support Protocol (NEMO BSP) is to create bi-directional tunnel between the Serving Mobile Routers (SMR) with its Home Agent (HA) and perform the handoff after complete layer 2 switching. Therefore, it should limit frequent registrations of Mobile Network Nodes (MNNs) with their HAs. Furthermore, creating bi-directional tunnel between MR and its HA for all communications makes sub-optimal problem, in which all the packets are tunneled and encapsulated via HA of the Serving MR. This increases handoff delay, packet loss and disconnections probability. To overcome handoff related problems, the Fast Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (FHMIPv6) works as a solution for host mobility. However, in nested NEMO environment applying improved FHMIPv6 mechanism is a challenging task since consideration has to be given to both MR and its MNNs as well. This paper proposed macro mobility scheme in order to achieve seamless handoff through modification of signaling messages. Additionally, location update cost is calculated and compared with NEMO BSP via analytical approach. The analytical result shows that the location update cost for the proposed scheme is about 69 % less than that of NEMO-BSP.
[1]
Samuel Pierre,et al.
Evaluating the Performance of Fast Handover for Hierarchical MIPv6 in Cellular Networks
,
2008,
J. Networks.
[2]
Heeyoung Jung,et al.
A Scheme for Supporting Fast Handover in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Networks
,
2005
.
[3]
Sang-Jo Yoo,et al.
Analysis of Fast Handover Mechanisms for Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Network Mobility
,
2009,
Wirel. Pers. Commun..
[4]
Charles E. Perkins,et al.
Mobility support in IPv6
,
1996,
MobiCom '96.
[5]
M. Atiquzzaman,et al.
SINEMO: an IP-diversity based approach for network mobility in space
,
2006,
2nd IEEE International Conference on Space Mission Challenges for Information Technology (SMC-IT'06).
[6]
Ying-Hong Wang,et al.
A Seamless Handover Scheme with Pre-registration in NEMO
,
2009,
2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.
[7]
Ping Wang,et al.
Improved Fast Handover scheme for Hierarchical Mobile IPv6
,
2009,
2009 4th International Conference on Computer Science & Education.
[8]
HeeYoung Jung,et al.
Fast handover support in hierarchical mobile IPv6
,
2004,
The 6th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, 2004..
[9]
Eranga Perera,et al.
Survey on network mobility support
,
2004,
MOCO.
[10]
Ryuji Wakikawa,et al.
Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol
,
2005,
RFC.
[11]
Claude Castelluccia,et al.
Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Mobility Management (HMIPv6)
,
2005,
RFC.