The L test of functional mobility: measurement properties of a modified version of the timed "up & go" test designed for people with lower-limb amputations.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Walk tests provide essential outcome information when assessing ambulation of individuals with lower-limb amputation and a prosthetic device. Existing tests have limitations such as ceiling effects or insufficient challenge. The objective of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of data for a clinical measure of basic mobility, the L Test of Functional Mobility (L Test). SUBJECTS For this methodological study, 93 people with unilateral amputations (74% transtibial, 26% transfemoral; 78% male, 22% female; mean age=55.9 years) were consecutively recruited from an outpatient clinic. Twenty-seven subjects returned for retesting. METHODS To assess concurrent validity, subjects completed the L Test, Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG), 10-Meter Walk Test, and 2-Minute Walk Test, followed by the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), and mobility subscale of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ-MS). Amputation cause and level, walking aid use, automatic stepping, and age variables were used to assess discriminant validity. RESULTS Intraclass correlation coefficients were .96 for interrater reliability and .97 for intrarater reliability, and minimal bias existed upon retesting. The magnitude of concurrent validity correlations (r) was very high between the L Test data and data for other walk tests and fair to moderate between the L Test data and data for self-report measures. The L Test discriminated between all groups as hypothesized. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The L Test is a 20-m test of basic mobility skills that includes 2 transfers and 4 turns. It demonstrated excellent measurement properties in this study.

[1]  T. Mills,et al.  Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires , 2006 .

[2]  B Shea,et al.  Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[3]  I. McDowell,et al.  Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 3rd ed. , 2006 .

[4]  S. Messick Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning. Research Report RR-94-45. , 1994 .

[5]  D. Wade,et al.  Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  M. Limburg,et al.  The Frenchay Activities Index: Assessment of Functional Status in Stroke Patients , 1993, Stroke.

[7]  M Toes,et al.  PROSTHESIS-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE FOLLOWING THROUGH KNEE AMPUTATION – THE WAIKATO EXPERIENCE , 2002 .

[8]  W H Eisma,et al.  The Timed "up and go" test: reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  N. Ikegami Functional assessment and its place in health care. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  L. E. Powell,et al.  The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[11]  W. Miller,et al.  Measurement properties of the Frenchay Activities Index among individuals with a lower limb amputation , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[12]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  M. Stokes,et al.  Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[14]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[15]  W. Miller,et al.  Lower extremity prosthetic mobility: a comparison of 3 self-report scales. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  C. Gauthier-Gagnon,et al.  Prosthetic profile of the amputee questionnaire: validity and reliability. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Ack,et al.  LOWER-EXTREMITY FUNCTION IN PERSONS OVER THE AGE OF 70 YEARS AS A PREDICTOR OF SUBSEQUENT DISABILITY , 2001 .

[18]  D. Datta,et al.  Timed walking test — an all-embracing outcome measure for lower-limb amputees? , 1996 .

[19]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. Minimal Clinically Important Difference. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[20]  Mark Speechley,et al.  The status of outcome measurement in amputee rehabilitation in Canada. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Effect of encouragement on walking test performance. , 1984, Thorax.

[22]  S. Messick Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning. Research Report RR-94-45. , 1994 .

[23]  J. Arendzen,et al.  Ten-metre walk, with or without a turn? , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[25]  W. Miller,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale among individuals with a lower-limb amputation. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  R B Wallace,et al.  Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[28]  C. Skilbeck,et al.  An activities index for use with stroke patients. , 1983, Age and ageing.

[29]  M. Mullee,et al.  Validation of the Frenchay Activities Index in a general population aged 16 years and older. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  D. Wade,et al.  Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  G D Reiber,et al.  Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  Beyond the 10-m time: A pilot study of timed walks in lower limb amputees , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[33]  G. Chard International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , 2004 .

[34]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[35]  A. Woodcock,et al.  Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. , 1982, British medical journal.