Flow management techniques for base and afterbody drag reduction

Abstract The problem of turbulent base flows and the drag associated with it have been of significant interest in missile as well as fighter aircraft design. Numerous studies in the literature have been devoted to aspects of reducing base drag on two-dimensional as well as on axisymmetric bodies. This paper presents a review of the developments that have taken place on the use of passive techniques or devices for axisymmetric base and net afterbody drag reduction in the absence of jet flow at the base. In particular, the paper discusses the effectiveness of base cavities, ventilated cavities, locked vortex afterbodies, multi-step afterbodies and afterbodies employing a non-axisymmetric boat-tailing concept for base and net drag reduction in different speed regimes. The broad features of the flow and the likely fluid-dynamical mechanisms associated with the device leading to base drag reduction are highlighted. Flight-test results assessing the effectiveness of some of the devices are compared with data from wind tunnels. The present survey indicates that base and net afterbody drag reduction of considerable engineering significance in aerospace applications can be achieved by various passive devices even when the (unmanipulated) base flow is not characterised by vortex shedding.

[1]  Pr Viswanath,et al.  Effectiveness of passive devices for axisymmetric base drag13; reduction at mach 2 , 1990 .

[2]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak,et al.  Separation control - Review , 1991 .

[3]  P. E. Hiley,et al.  Nonaxisymmetric Nozzles Installed in Advanced Fighter Aircraft , 1976 .

[4]  Eugene S. Love,et al.  The Base Pressure at Supersonic Speeds on Two-Dimensional Airfoils and Bodies of Revolution (With and Without Fins) Having Turbulent Boundary Layers , 1953 .

[5]  Eugene H. Miller,et al.  Methodology for analysis of afterbodies for three-dimensional aircraft configurations , 1988 .

[6]  C. Wood,et al.  Visualization of an incompressible wake with base bleed , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  W. A. Mair,et al.  Bluff bodies and vortex shedding – a report on Euromech 17 , 1971, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  F. J. Capone Aeropropulsive characteristics of Mach numbers up to 2.2 of axisymmetric and nonaxisymmetric nozzles installed on an F-18 model , 1982 .

[10]  Sheryll Goecke Powers Flight Tests of External Modifications Used to Reduce Blunt Base Drag , 1988 .

[11]  S. N. B. Murthy Aerodynamics of base combustion , 1976 .

[12]  M. Badrinarayanan An Experimental Investigation of Base Flows at Supersonic Speeds , 1961, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[13]  W. A. Mair The Effect of a Rear-Mounted Disc on the Drag of a Blunt-Based Body of Revolution , 1965 .

[14]  Thomas Morel Effect of Base Cavities on the Aerodynamic Drag of an Axisymmetric Cylinder , 1979 .

[15]  M. Tanner,et al.  Reduction of base drag , 1975 .

[16]  Anders S. Platou Improved Projectile Boattail , 1975 .

[17]  W. A. Mair Reduction of Base Drag by Boat-Tailed Afterbodies in Low-Speed Flow , 1969 .

[18]  Roddam Narasimha,et al.  Reverse Transition at an Expansion Corner in Supersonic Flow , 1975 .

[19]  A. Roshko On the drag and shedding frequency of two-dimensional bluff bodies , 1954 .

[20]  Steady base flows , 1984 .

[21]  H. E. Fiedler,et al.  On management and control of turbulent shear flows , 1990 .

[22]  Dean R. Chapman,et al.  Investigation of separated flows in supersonic and subsonic streams with emphasis on the effect of transition , 1958 .

[23]  W. K. Abeyounis,et al.  Comparison of Algebraic Turbulence Models for Afterbody Flows with Jet Exhaust , 1992 .

[24]  S. R. Patil,et al.  Subsonic axisymmetric base flow experiments with base modifications , 1980 .

[25]  D. M. Bushnell,et al.  An overview of concepts for aircraft drag reductions , 1977 .

[26]  T. Mueller Determination of the turbulent base pressure in supersonic axisymmetric flow. , 1967 .

[27]  J. Dussauge,et al.  Behavior of a turbulent flow, strongly out of equilibrium, at supersonic speeds , 1977 .

[28]  J. A. C. Kentfield Short, multi-step, afterbody fairings , 1984 .

[29]  Pr Viswanath Passive devices for axisymmetric base drag reduction at transonic speeds , 1988 .

[30]  A. Roshko,et al.  An experimental study of geometrical effects on the drag and flow field of two bluff bodies separated by a gap , 1985, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[31]  J. R. Calvert,et al.  Experiments on the low-speed flow past cones , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[32]  L. E. Putnam,et al.  Results of AGARD assessment of prediction capabilities for nozzle afterbody flows , 1985 .

[33]  J. C. Dutton,et al.  Effects of a Base Cavity on Subsonic Near-Wake Flow , 1990 .

[34]  P. E. Hiley,et al.  Installed Performance of Vectoring/Reversing Nonaxisymmetric Nozzles , 1979 .

[35]  Wakes of three axisymmetric bodies at zero angle of attack , 1993 .

[36]  Kenneth McK. Eldred,et al.  Base Pressure Fluctuations , 1960 .

[37]  R. Whipkey,et al.  Locked Vortex Afterbodies , 1979 .

[38]  Dean R Chapman,et al.  An analysis of base pressure at supersonic velocities and comparison with experiment , 1951 .