Spacecraft charging and ion wake formation in the near-Sun environment

A three-dimensional, self-consistent code is employed to solve for the static potential structure surrounding a spacecraft in a high photoelectron environment. The numerical solutions show that, under certain conditions, a spacecraft can take on a negative potential in spite of strong photoelectron currents. The negative potential is due to an electrostatic barrier near the surface of the spacecraft that can reflect a large fraction of the photoelectron flux back to the spacecraft. This electrostatic barrier forms if (1) the photoelectron density at the surface of the spacecraft greatly exceeds the ambient plasma density, (2) the spacecraft size is significantly larger than local Debye length of the photoelectrons, and (3) the thermal electron energy is much larger than the characteristic energy of the escaping photoelectrons. All of these conditions are present near the Sun. The numerical solutions also show that the spacecraft's negative potential can be amplified by an ion wake. The negative potential of the ion wake prevents secondary electrons from escaping the part of spacecraft in contact with the wake. These findings may be important for future spacecraft missions that go nearer to the Sun, such as Solar Orbiter and Solar Probe Plus.

[1]  H. Usui,et al.  New electromagnetic particle simulation code for the analysis of spacecraft-plasma interactions , 2009 .

[2]  I. Dandouras,et al.  Electron density estimations derived from spacecraft potential measurements on Cluster in tenuous plasma regions , 2008 .

[3]  A. Eriksson,et al.  Electrostatic structure around spacecraft in tenuous plasmas , 2007 .

[4]  E. Engwall,et al.  Wake formation behind positively charged spacecraft in flowing tenuous plasmas , 2006 .

[5]  P. Lindqvist,et al.  Electric field measurements on Cluster : comparing the double-probe and electron drift techniques , 2006 .

[6]  V. Génot,et al.  Potential barrier in the electrostatic sheath around a magnetospheric spacecraft , 2004 .

[7]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Spacecraft potential effects on electron moments derived from a perfect plasma detector , 2004 .

[8]  J. Berthelier,et al.  A study of the electrical charging of the Rosetta orbiter: 1. Numerical model , 2004 .

[9]  H. Laakso.  Variation of the spacecraft potential in the magnetosphere , 2002 .

[10]  M. Adrian.  The density-potential (Ne-VS/C) relation in the high-latitude prenoon ionosphere , 2002 .

[11]  Colin Tudge,et al.  Planet , 1999 .

[12]  Per-Arne Lindqvist,et al.  Density in the magnetosphere inferred from ISEE 1 spacecraft potential , 1997 .

[13]  A. Pedersen,et al.  Solar wind and magnetosphere plasma diagnostics by spacecraft electrostatic potential measurements , 1995 .

[14]  J. M. Bosqued,et al.  A three-dimensional plasma and energetic particle investigation for the wind spacecraft , 1995 .

[15]  J. G. Laframboise,et al.  Current collection by probes and electrodes in space magnetoplasmas: A review , 1993 .

[16]  S. Lai.  Theory and observation of triple‐root jump in spacecraft charging , 1991 .

[17]  J. G. Laframboise,et al.  High-voltage polar-orbit and beam-induced charging of a dielectric spacecraft: A wake-induced barrier effect mechanism , 1989 .

[18]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Long-term behaviour of photo-electron emission from the electric field double probe sensors on GEOS-2 , 1987 .

[19]  M. S. Gussenhoven,et al.  SCATHA survey of high-level spacecraft charging in sunlight , 1986 .

[20]  Akira Kadokura,et al.  Two‐dimensional numerical modeling of the cosmic ray storm , 1986 .

[21]  H. Garrett.  The charging of spacecraft surfaces , 1981 .

[22]  E. Whipple.  Potentials of surfaces in space , 1981 .

[23]  H. Maassberg,et al.  Particle-in-cell simulation of the plasma environment of a spacecraft in the solar wind , 1981 .

[24]  R. Guernsey,et al.  Potential distribution surrounding a photo-emitting, plate in a dilute plasma , 1970 .