Hierarchical virtual screening for the discovery of new molecular scaffolds in antibacterial hit identification

One of the initial steps of modern drug discovery is the identification of small organic molecules able to inhibit a target macromolecule of therapeutic interest. A small proportion of these hits are further developed into lead compounds, which in turn may ultimately lead to a marketed drug. A commonly used screening protocol used for this task is high-throughput screening (HTS). However, the performance of HTS against antibacterial targets has generally been unsatisfactory, with high costs and low rates of hit identification. Here, we present a novel computational methodology that is able to identify a high proportion of structurally diverse inhibitors by searching unusually large molecular databases in a time-, cost- and resource-efficient manner. This virtual screening methodology was tested prospectively on two versions of an antibacterial target (type II dehydroquinase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Streptomyces coelicolor), for which HTS has not provided satisfactory results and consequently practically all known inhibitors are derivatives of the same core scaffold. Overall, our protocols identified 100 new inhibitors, with calculated Ki ranging from 4 to 250 μM (confirmed hit rates are 60% and 62% against each version of the target). Most importantly, over 50 new active molecular scaffolds were discovered that underscore the benefits that a wide application of prospectively validated in silico screening tools is likely to bring to antibacterial hit identification.

[1]  T. Peakman,et al.  Delivering the power of discovery in large pharmaceutical organizations. , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[2]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Virtual screening: an endless staircase? , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[3]  D. Payne,et al.  Finding the gems using genomic discovery: antibacterial drug discovery strategies – the successes and the challenges , 2004 .

[4]  G. Wright,et al.  Resisting resistance: new chemical strategies for battling superbugs. , 2000, Chemistry & biology.

[5]  Thierry Langer,et al.  Discovery of novel PPAR ligands by a virtual screening approach based on pharmacophore modeling, 3D shape, and electrostatic similarity screening. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  Crystal structures of Helicobacter pylori type II dehydroquinase inhibitor complexes: new directions for inhibitor design. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  C. Fishwick,et al.  Structure-based discovery of antibacterial drugs , 2010, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[8]  Shuichi Hirono,et al.  Comparison of Consensus Scoring Strategies for Evaluating Computational Models of Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[9]  John P. Overington,et al.  Rapid Analysis of Pharmacology for Infectious Diseases , 2011, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[10]  G. V. Paolini,et al.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[11]  Chris Abell,et al.  The structure and mechanism of the type II dehydroquinase from Streptomyces coelicolor. , 2002, Structure.

[12]  György M Keseru,et al.  Hit discovery and hit-to-lead approaches. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[13]  Christopher T. Walsh,et al.  Antibiotics for Emerging Pathogens , 2009, Science.

[14]  Pedro J Ballester,et al.  Ultrafast shape recognition: method and applications. , 2011, Future medicinal chemistry.

[15]  John B. O. Mitchell,et al.  Theoretical Study of the Reaction Mechanism of Streptomyces coelicolor Type II Dehydroquinase. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[16]  D. Pompliano,et al.  Drugs for bad bugs: confronting the challenges of antibacterial discovery , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[17]  James M Aramini,et al.  Structures of influenza A proteins and insights into antiviral drug targets , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[18]  Robert Nadon,et al.  Statistical practice in high-throughput screening data analysis , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Bo Wang,et al.  Support Vector Regression Scoring of Receptor-Ligand Complexes for Rank-Ordering and Virtual Screening of Chemical Libraries , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[20]  R. Payne,et al.  Design, Synthesis, and Structural Studies on Potent Biaryl Inhibitors of Type II Dehydroquinases , 2007, ChemMedChem.

[21]  J. Mestres,et al.  Chemical probes for biological systems. , 2011, Drug discovery today.

[22]  Marcel L Verdonk,et al.  General and targeted statistical potentials for protein–ligand interactions , 2005, Proteins.

[23]  Pedro J. Ballester,et al.  Ultrafast shape recognition for similarity search in molecular databases , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[24]  John B. O. Mitchell,et al.  Comments on "Leave-Cluster-Out Cross-Validation Is Appropriate for Scoring Functions Derived from Diverse Protein Data Sets": Significance for the Validation of Scoring Functions , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[25]  Alexander M. Lewis,et al.  Identification of a chemical probe for NAADP by virtual screening , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[26]  Sourav Das,et al.  Binding Affinity Prediction with Property-Encoded Shape Distribution Signatures , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[27]  Ricardo Macarron,et al.  Enhancements of screening collections to address areas of unmet medical need: an industry perspective. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[28]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  The , 1966 .

[29]  John B. O. Mitchell,et al.  A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking , 2010, Bioinform..

[30]  R. Glen,et al.  Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Eric Arnoult,et al.  The challenge of new drug discovery for tuberculosis , 2011, Nature.

[32]  W. Janzen,et al.  High Throughput Screening , 2009, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[33]  M. Toscano,et al.  Rational design of new bifunctional inhibitors of type II dehydroquinase. , 2005, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[34]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  ZINC - A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[35]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  A Machine Learning-Based Method To Improve Docking Scoring Functions and Its Application to Drug Repurposing , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[36]  Lindsay Sawyer,et al.  The two types of 3-dehydroquinase have distinct structures but catalyze the same overall reaction , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[37]  T. Rognes,et al.  Genome dynamics in major bacterial pathogens , 2009, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[38]  Nathan Brown,et al.  Molecular optimization using computational multi-objective methods. , 2007, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[39]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Quo vadis, virtual screening? A comprehensive survey of prospective applications. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  Tanya Parish,et al.  The common aromatic amino acid biosynthesis pathway is essential in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 2002, Microbiology.

[41]  Yongyuth Yuthavong,et al.  Crystal structure of dihydrofolate reductase from Plasmodium vivax: pyrimethamine displacement linked with mutation-induced resistance. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Honglin Li,et al.  Identification of novel falcipain-2 inhibitors as potential antimalarial agents through structure-based virtual screening. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[43]  Dale E. Johnson,et al.  Computational toxicology: heading toward more relevance in drug discovery and development. , 2006, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[44]  Thomas Steger-Hartmann,et al.  Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances. , 2006, Toxicology.

[45]  Ji-Hu Zhang,et al.  Probing the Primary Screening Efficiency by Multiple Replicate Testing: A Quantitative Analysis of Hit Confirmation and False Screening Results of a Biochemical Assay , 2005, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[46]  Solomon Nwaka,et al.  Innovative lead discovery strategies for tropical diseases , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[47]  M. Murcko,et al.  Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[48]  Pedro M Alzari,et al.  Rising standards for tuberculosis drug development. , 2008, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[49]  David S Goodsell,et al.  Structure-based virtual screening and biological evaluation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate reductase inhibitors. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[50]  Pedro J Ballester,et al.  Prospective virtual screening with Ultrafast Shape Recognition: the identification of novel inhibitors of arylamine N-acetyltransferases , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[51]  Stuart L. Schreiber,et al.  Quantifying structure and performance diversity for sets of small molecules comprising small-molecule screening collections , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.