Hierarchical virtual screening for the discovery of new molecular scaffolds in antibacterial hit identification
暂无分享,去创建一个
John B. O. Mitchell | Pedro J. Ballester | Jochen Blumberger | Martina Mangold | Nigel I. Howard | Richard L. Marchese Robinson | Chris Abell | C. Abell | J. Blumberger | R. M. Robinson | Nigel I. Howard | P. Ballester | M. Mangold
[1] T. Peakman,et al. Delivering the power of discovery in large pharmaceutical organizations. , 2003, Drug discovery today.
[2] Gisbert Schneider,et al. Virtual screening: an endless staircase? , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[3] D. Payne,et al. Finding the gems using genomic discovery: antibacterial drug discovery strategies – the successes and the challenges , 2004 .
[4] G. Wright,et al. Resisting resistance: new chemical strategies for battling superbugs. , 2000, Chemistry & biology.
[5] Thierry Langer,et al. Discovery of novel PPAR ligands by a virtual screening approach based on pharmacophore modeling, 3D shape, and electrostatic similarity screening. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[6] Crystal structures of Helicobacter pylori type II dehydroquinase inhibitor complexes: new directions for inhibitor design. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[7] C. Fishwick,et al. Structure-based discovery of antibacterial drugs , 2010, Nature Reviews Microbiology.
[8] Shuichi Hirono,et al. Comparison of Consensus Scoring Strategies for Evaluating Computational Models of Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[9] John P. Overington,et al. Rapid Analysis of Pharmacology for Infectious Diseases , 2011, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[10] G. V. Paolini,et al. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[11] Chris Abell,et al. The structure and mechanism of the type II dehydroquinase from Streptomyces coelicolor. , 2002, Structure.
[12] György M Keseru,et al. Hit discovery and hit-to-lead approaches. , 2006, Drug discovery today.
[13] Christopher T. Walsh,et al. Antibiotics for Emerging Pathogens , 2009, Science.
[14] Pedro J Ballester,et al. Ultrafast shape recognition: method and applications. , 2011, Future medicinal chemistry.
[15] John B. O. Mitchell,et al. Theoretical Study of the Reaction Mechanism of Streptomyces coelicolor Type II Dehydroquinase. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[16] D. Pompliano,et al. Drugs for bad bugs: confronting the challenges of antibacterial discovery , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[17] James M Aramini,et al. Structures of influenza A proteins and insights into antiviral drug targets , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[18] Robert Nadon,et al. Statistical practice in high-throughput screening data analysis , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.
[19] Bo Wang,et al. Support Vector Regression Scoring of Receptor-Ligand Complexes for Rank-Ordering and Virtual Screening of Chemical Libraries , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[20] R. Payne,et al. Design, Synthesis, and Structural Studies on Potent Biaryl Inhibitors of Type II Dehydroquinases , 2007, ChemMedChem.
[21] J. Mestres,et al. Chemical probes for biological systems. , 2011, Drug discovery today.
[22] Marcel L Verdonk,et al. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein–ligand interactions , 2005, Proteins.
[23] Pedro J. Ballester,et al. Ultrafast shape recognition for similarity search in molecular databases , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[24] John B. O. Mitchell,et al. Comments on "Leave-Cluster-Out Cross-Validation Is Appropriate for Scoring Functions Derived from Diverse Protein Data Sets": Significance for the Validation of Scoring Functions , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[25] Alexander M. Lewis,et al. Identification of a chemical probe for NAADP by virtual screening , 2009, Nature chemical biology.
[26] Sourav Das,et al. Binding Affinity Prediction with Property-Encoded Shape Distribution Signatures , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[27] Ricardo Macarron,et al. Enhancements of screening collections to address areas of unmet medical need: an industry perspective. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[28] Hilla Peretz,et al. The , 1966 .
[29] John B. O. Mitchell,et al. A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking , 2010, Bioinform..
[30] R. Glen,et al. Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.
[31] Eric Arnoult,et al. The challenge of new drug discovery for tuberculosis , 2011, Nature.
[32] W. Janzen,et al. High Throughput Screening , 2009, Methods in Molecular Biology.
[33] M. Toscano,et al. Rational design of new bifunctional inhibitors of type II dehydroquinase. , 2005, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.
[34] Brian K. Shoichet,et al. ZINC - A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[35] Philip E. Bourne,et al. A Machine Learning-Based Method To Improve Docking Scoring Functions and Its Application to Drug Repurposing , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[36] Lindsay Sawyer,et al. The two types of 3-dehydroquinase have distinct structures but catalyze the same overall reaction , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.
[37] T. Rognes,et al. Genome dynamics in major bacterial pathogens , 2009, FEMS microbiology reviews.
[38] Nathan Brown,et al. Molecular optimization using computational multi-objective methods. , 2007, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[39] J. Bajorath,et al. Quo vadis, virtual screening? A comprehensive survey of prospective applications. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[40] Tanya Parish,et al. The common aromatic amino acid biosynthesis pathway is essential in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 2002, Microbiology.
[41] Yongyuth Yuthavong,et al. Crystal structure of dihydrofolate reductase from Plasmodium vivax: pyrimethamine displacement linked with mutation-induced resistance. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[42] Honglin Li,et al. Identification of novel falcipain-2 inhibitors as potential antimalarial agents through structure-based virtual screening. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[43] Dale E. Johnson,et al. Computational toxicology: heading toward more relevance in drug discovery and development. , 2006, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[44] Thomas Steger-Hartmann,et al. Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances. , 2006, Toxicology.
[45] Ji-Hu Zhang,et al. Probing the Primary Screening Efficiency by Multiple Replicate Testing: A Quantitative Analysis of Hit Confirmation and False Screening Results of a Biochemical Assay , 2005, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[46] Solomon Nwaka,et al. Innovative lead discovery strategies for tropical diseases , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[47] M. Murcko,et al. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[48] Pedro M Alzari,et al. Rising standards for tuberculosis drug development. , 2008, Trends in pharmacological sciences.
[49] David S Goodsell,et al. Structure-based virtual screening and biological evaluation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate reductase inhibitors. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[50] Pedro J Ballester,et al. Prospective virtual screening with Ultrafast Shape Recognition: the identification of novel inhibitors of arylamine N-acetyltransferases , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[51] Stuart L. Schreiber,et al. Quantifying structure and performance diversity for sets of small molecules comprising small-molecule screening collections , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.