Elastokinematics and compliance of a rectilinear rear independent suspension

A rectilinear rear independent suspension has a distinct difference from the traditional ones in that its wheel alignment parameters remain invariable in theoretical kinematics. However, they change within a narrow interval during jounce and rebound when the elasticity of parts, especially the rubber bushings, is taken into account. With the aim of investigating the compliance of the rectilinear rear independent suspension, an elastokinematic model is established in accordance with static equilibrium equations and compatibility conditions. The elastokinematic model has 28 unknowns corresponding to the 5 static equilibrium equations and 23 compatibility equations. Different configurations of rubber bushing and the sensitivity of the suspension stiffness to that of the rubber bushing are analysed. The analytical results indicate that the rubber bushings are best mounted close to the knuckle, and the suspension stiffness is sensitive to the compressive stiffness and the torsional stiffness about the z-axis of the rubber bushing. In addition, the results from kinematic and compliance tests not only verified the elastokinematic model but also revealed the excellent wheel alignment capacity of the rectilinear rear independent suspension compared with that of the MacPherson suspension. This work provided the foundations for the engineering design of a rectilinear rear independent suspension.

[1]  Julian Happian-Smith,et al.  An Introduction to Modern Vehicle Design , 2002 .

[2]  D.-O. Kang,et al.  Robust design optimization of the McPherson suspension system with consideration of a bush compliance uncertainty , 2010 .

[3]  Souharda Raghavendra.  Compliant multi-link vehicle suspensions , 2008 .

[4]  Fulei Chu,et al.  Advanced Theory of Constraint and Motion Analysis for Robot Mechanisms , 2013 .

[5]  Man Bok Hong,et al.  New Jacobian approach to the kinestatic analysis of a planar double-wishbone suspension mechanism , 2013 .

[6]  Longxiang Yang,et al.  A Novel Error Detection due to Joint CRC Aided Denoise-and-Forward Network Coding for Two-Way Relay Channels , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[7]  M. Raghavan,et al.  Number and dimensional synthesis of independent suspension mechanisms , 1996 .

[8]  Nader Jalili,et al.  Modelling, simulation, and experimental verification of the kinematics and dynamics of a double wishbone suspension configuration , 2009 .

[9]  Fulei Chu,et al.  Synthesis of Rectilinear Motion Generating Spatial Mechanism With Application to Automotive Suspension , 2008 .

[10]  J. Knapczyk,et al.  Stiffness Synthesis of a Five-Rod Suspension for Given Load-Displacement Characteristics , 2006 .

[11]  P. A. Simionescu,et al.  Synthesis and analysis of the five-link rear suspension system used in automobiles , 2002 .

[12]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  A feasibility study on elastokinematic parameter identification for a multilink suspension , 2002 .

[13]  Ramon Sancibrian,et al.  Kinematic design of double-wishbone suspension systems using a multiobjective optimisation approach , 2010 .

[14]  Yunqing Zhang,et al.  The concept design and dynamics analysis of a novel vehicle suspension mechanism with invariable orientation parameters , 2010 .

[15]  Masataka Nasada.  Effect on compliance and alignment variation with respect to stiffness of knuckle and shock absorber in a McPherson strut suspension , 2006 .

[16]  Xianfu Cheng,et al.  Multiobjective Robust Design of the Double Wishbone Suspension System Based on Particle Swarm Optimization , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[17]  Fulei Chu,et al.  Free Motion of the End Effector of a Robot Mechanism , 2014 .

[18]  Xiang Liu,et al.  Design of a Rectilinear Suspension with Automatic Length Compensation Branches , 2012 .

[19]  J. Knapczyk,et al.  Elastokinematic modeling and study of five-rod suspension with subframe , 2006 .

[20]  John C. Dixon,et al.  Suspension Geometry and computation , 2009 .