Stakeholder participation in health impact assessment: A multicultural approach

Abstract The literature on impact assessment (HIA) registers the importance of stakeholder participation in the assessment process, but still lacks a model for engaging stakeholders of diverse ethnic, professional and sectorial backgrounds. This paper suggests that the multicultural approach can contribute to HIA through a revision of the generic 5-step HIA model, and its implementation in a metropolitan plan in Southern Israel. The health issue scoped by the stakeholders in the HIA is related to land uses in the vicinity of the national hazardous industry and hazardous waste site. The stakeholders were representatives of the diverse populations at stake, including rural Bedouins and Jewish city dwellers, as well as representatives from the public sector, private sector, non-governmental organizations and academia. The case study revealed that a multicultural stakeholder participation process helps to uncover health issues known to the community which were not addressed in the original plan, and provides local knowledge regarding health conditions that is especially valuable when scientific data is uncertain or absent. It enables diverse stakeholders to prioritize the health issues that will be assessed. The case study also reveals ways in which the model needs revisions and improvements such as in recruitment of diverse participants. This paper presents a multicultural model of HIA and discusses some of the challenges that are faced when HIA is implemented in the context of current decision-making culture.

[1]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[2]  A. Bolotin,et al.  Perinatal Mortality and Residential Proximity to an Industrial Park , 2008, Archives of environmental & occupational health.

[3]  J. Dryzek.  Deliberative democracy and beyond : liberals, critics, contestations , 2000 .

[4]  D. Massey,et al.  Complexity and emergence (another conversation) , 2006 .

[5]  O. Dwivedi.  The Challenge of Cultural Diversity for Good Governance ∗ , 2002 .

[6]  Rajiv Bhatia,et al.  Integration of health and environment through health impact assessment: cases from three continents. , 2012, Environmental research.

[7]  Rainer Fehr,et al.  Environmental health impact assessment: evaluation of a ten-step model. , 1999 .

[8]  Y. Garb,et al.  Environmental Hazards of Waste Disposal Patterns—A Multimethod Study in an Unrecognized Bedouin Village in the Negev Area of Israel , 2010, Archives of environmental & occupational health.

[9]  Rajiv Bhatia,et al.  Growing the field of health impact assessment in the United States: an agenda for research and practice. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[10]  P. Brown,et al.  Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: lay and professional ways of knowing. , 1992, Journal of health and social behavior.

[11]  D Kriebel,et al.  Assessing health impact assessment: multidisciplinary and international perspectives , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[12]  E. Elliott,et al.  Developing a civic intelligence: local involvement in HIA , 2004 .

[13]  A. Boaz,et al.  EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE Enhancing the evidence base for health impact assessment , 2004 .

[14]  R. Hershkovitz,et al.  Major congenital malformations and residential proximity to a regional industrial park including a national toxic waste site: An ecological study , 2006, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[15]  J. Tickner.  Developing Scientific and Policy Methods That Support Precautionary Action in the Face of Uncertainty—The Institute of Medicine Committee on Agent Orange , 2002 .

[16]  H. Wagenaar,et al.  Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation , 2007 .

[17]  N. Teschner,et al.  Rethinking the relationship between technical and local knowledge: Toward a multi-type approach , 2013 .

[18]  Judith Petts,et al.  Barriers to participation and deliberation in risk decisions: evidence from waste management , 2004 .

[19]  Y. Beebeejaun.  What's in a nation? Constructing ethnicity in the British planning system , 2004 .

[20]  Nurit Alfasi,et al.  Is Public Participation Making Urban Planning More Democratic? The Israeli Experience , 2003 .

[21]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and competence in citizen participation : evaluating models for environmental discourse , 1995 .

[22]  T. Webler,et al.  Public Participation in Impact Assess-ment: A Social Learning Perspective , 1995 .

[23]  K. Soma,et al.  Framing participation with multicriterion evaluations to support the management of complex environmental issues , 2010 .

[24]  Yasminah Beebeejaun,et al.  The participation trap: The limitations of participation for ethnic and racial groups , 2006 .

[25]  B. Cave,et al.  Developing a practical guide to assess the potential health impact of urban regeneration schemes , 2001, Promotion & education.

[26]  P. Healey.  Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[27]  M. Negev.  Knowledge, data and interests: Challenges in participation of diverse stakeholders in HIA , 2012 .

[28]  B. Cooke,et al.  Participation: the New Tyranny? , 2001 .

[29]  Judith Green,et al.  Qualitative methods for health research , 2004 .

[30]  John Kemm,et al.  Health Impact Assessment , 2004 .

[31]  Health impact assessment in the UK planning system: the possibilities and limits of community engagement. , 2013, Health promotion international.

[32]  C. O’faircheallaigh.  Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making , 2010 .

[33]  M. Kearney,et al.  WALKING THE WALK? COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN HIA A QUALITATIVE INTERVIEW STUDY , 2004 .

[34]  Jason Corburn,et al.  Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice , 2005 .

[35]  Suzanne Scheld,et al.  Rethinking Urban Parks: Public Space and Cultural Diversity , 2006 .

[36]  H. Wagenaar,et al.  Democracy and Prostitution , 2006 .

[37]  E. Harris,et al.  Differing forms, differing purposes: A typology of health impact assessment , 2011 .

[38]  Andrew L. Dannenberg,et al.  Health impact assessment: A comparison of 45 local, national, and international guidelines , 2012 .

[39]  Thomas C. Beierle.  Public Participation in Environmental Decisions: An Evaluation Framework Using Social Goals , 1998 .

[40]  J. Eyles,et al.  Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[41]  R. Bhopal.  Ethnicity, Race, and Health in Multicultural Societies: Foundations for Better Epidemiology, Public Health, and Health Care , 2007 .

[42]  N. Davidovitch,et al.  Bedouin-Arab women's access to antenatal care at the interface of physical and structural barriers: A pilot study , 2011, Global public health.

[43]  J. Parry,et al.  Community participation in health impact assessments: intuitively appealing but practically difficult. , 2003, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[44]  A. Gutmann.  The challenge of multiculturalism in political ethics , 1993 .

[45]  C. Inglis.  Multiculturalism : new policy responses to diversity , 1996 .

[46]  M. Wismar,et al.  What is HIA and why might it be useful , 2007 .