Preoperative severity of emphysema predictive of improvement after lung volume reduction surgery: use of CT morphometry.

STUDY OBJECTIVE To determine how the volume and severity of emphysema measured by CT morphometry (CTM) before and after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) relates to the functional status of patients after LVRS. DESIGN A histologically validated CT algorithm was used to quantify the volume and severity of emphysema in 35 patients before and after LVRS: total lung volume (TLV), normal lung volume (< 6.0 mL gas per gram of tissue), volume of mild/moderate emphysema (ME; 6.0 to 10.2 mL gas per gram of tissue), volume of severe emphysema (> 10.2 mL gas per gram of tissue), surface area/volume (SA/V; meters squared per milliliter), and surface area (SA; meters squared). Outcome parameters included maximal cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) performance in 21 patients and routine pulmonary function in all patients. We hypothesized that baseline CTM parameters predict response to LVRS and that the change in these parameters may offer insight into mechanisms of improvement. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION Thirty-five patients with severe emphysema who had successful LVRS. RESULTS The significant decrease in TLV following LVRS was entirely accounted for by a decrease in severe emphysema. The SA/V and the SA both increased significantly following LVRS. The change in maximal CPX in watts following surgery correlated significantly with baseline values of severe emphysema (r = 0.60), which was collinear with TLV, and SA/V. The change in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide revealed a significant positive linear relationship with preoperative severe emphysema (r = 0.37) and a negative relationship with ME (r = -0.37). Change in watts revealed a strong relationship with changes in severe emphysema (r = -0.75) and weaker but significant relationships with change in TLV, ME, SA/V, and SA. Other measures of pulmonary function revealed significant albeit less dominant relationships with baseline CTM and change in these indexes. CONCLUSION Using CTM, we have identified a close relationship between baseline severe emphysema, or change in severe emphysema, and the improvement in CPX after LVRS. These observations support a potential role of CTM in future clinical trials for predicting responders to LVRS and identifying mechanisms of improvement.

[1]  S. Scharf,et al.  Development of pulmonary hypertension after lung volume reduction surgery. , 1999, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[2]  R M Slone,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: comparison of preoperative quantitative CT and physiologic index values with clinical outcome after lung-volume reduction surgery. , 1997, Radiology.

[3]  R. Rogers,et al.  Improvement in pulmonary function and elastic recoil after lung-reduction surgery for diffuse emphysema. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  A A Bankier,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: subjective visual grading versus objective quantification with macroscopic morphometry and thin-section CT densitometry. , 1999, Radiology.

[5]  J. Cooper,et al.  Bilateral pneumectomy (volume reduction) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  E. Nikkila Letter: Serum high-density-lipoprotein and coronary heart-disease. , 1976, Lancet.

[7]  J. Best,et al.  CT measurements of lung density in life can quantitate distal airspace enlargement--an essential defining feature of human emphysema. , 1988, The American review of respiratory disease.

[8]  G J Kemerink,et al.  Density resolution in quantitative computed tomography of foam and lung. , 1996, Medical physics.

[9]  F. Sciurba,et al.  Unilateral thoracoscopic surgical approach for diffuse emphysema. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  R. Rogers,et al.  Lung reduction surgery in chronic obstructive lung disease. , 1996, The Medical clinics of North America.

[11]  O. Brantigan,et al.  A surgical approach to pulmonary emphysema. , 1959, The American review of respiratory disease.

[12]  R M Slone,et al.  Patients with emphysema: quantitative CT analysis before and after lung volume reduction surgery. Work in progress. , 1997, Radiology.

[13]  G. Criner,et al.  Effect of lung volume reduction surgery on diaphragm strength. , 1998, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[14]  N J Morrison,et al.  Limitations of computed tomography in the assessment of emphysema. , 1989, The American review of respiratory disease.

[15]  F. Sciurba Early and long-term functional outcomes following lung volume reduction surgery. , 1997, Clinics in chest medicine.

[16]  J. Best,et al.  DIAGNOSIS OF PULMONARY EMPHYSEMA BY COMPUTERISED TOMOGRAPHY , 1984, The Lancet.

[17]  B. Celli,et al.  Lung reduction surgery in severe COPD decreases central drive and ventilatory response to CO2. , 1997, Chest.

[18]  N. Zamel,et al.  Lung function 4 years after lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema. , 1999, Chest.

[19]  G. Patterson,et al.  Results of 150 consecutive bilateral lung volume reduction procedures in patients with severe emphysema. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[20]  D. Kuhl,et al.  Measurement of the vital capacity and perfusion of each lung by fluoroscopy and macroaggregated albumin lung scanning. An alternative to bronchospirometry for evaluating individual lung function. , 1967, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  N. Zamel,et al.  Contribution of lung and chest wall mechanics following emphysema resection. , 1996, Chest.

[22]  R. Mckenna,et al.  A randomized, prospective trial of stapled lung reduction versus laser bullectomy for diffuse emphysema. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  D. Wood,et al.  Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Severe Emphysema , 2018 .

[24]  W. Klepetko,et al.  Neural drive to the diaphragm after lung volume reduction surgery. , 1999, Chest.

[25]  I K Mun,et al.  Lung volumes before and after lung volume reduction surgery: quantitative CT analysis. , 1998, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[26]  R. Rogers,et al.  Effect of removal of bullae on airway conductance and conductance volume ratios. , 1968, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[27]  O. Brantigan,et al.  Surgical treatment of pulmonary emphysema. , 1957, The American surgeon.

[28]  N. Müller,et al.  "Density mask". An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. , 1988, Chest.

[29]  M J Tobin,et al.  Effect of lung volume reduction surgery on neuromechanical coupling of the diaphragm. , 1998, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[30]  P. Paré,et al.  A quantification of the lung surface area in emphysema using computed tomography. , 1999, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[31]  J. Curtis,et al.  Weight gain after lung volume reduction surgery is not correlated with improvement in pulmonary mechanics. , 1999, Chest.

[32]  I. Kreel The surgical approach. , 1983, The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York.

[33]  B. Celli Pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with advanced lung disease. , 1997, Clinics in chest medicine.