Results of different kinds of carotid endarterectomy in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the important markers for the development of adverse cardiovascular events after carotid endarterectomy (CEE). However, studies on this issue are based on small sample of patients and do not take into account the type of surgery as an additional factor of potentially negative impact on the course of the postoperative period.AIM: Analysis of hospital and long-term results of eversion and classical CEE with plastic surgery of the reconstruction zone with a biological patch in patients with type 2 diabetes and without it.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study from January 2010 to December 2020. included 5731 patients. Depending on the presence / absence of type 2 diabetes and the type of implemented CEE, 4 groups were formed: group 1 — 12.2% (n = 702) — patients with type 2 diabetes and eversion CEE; Group 2 — 55.0% (n = 3153) patients without type 2 diabetes and eversion CEE; Group 3 — 8.5% (n = 484) patients with type 2 diabetes and classical CEE; Group 4 — 24.3% (n = 1392) patients without type 2 diabetes and classical CEE. The duration of postoperative follow-up was 78.6 ± 39.2 months.RESULTS: At the long-term follow-up stage, patients with type 2 diabetes after the classical surgical technique demonstrated the highest rates of all types of complications: death (p <0.0001), MI (p = 0.011), ischemic stroke (p <0.0001), restenosis / occlusion of the ICA (p <0.0001), combined end point (p <0.0001). At the same time, the group of eversion CEE with impaired carbohydrate metabolism took the second position in terms of the prevalence of adverse events. These circumstances demonstrate that patch implantation is accompanied by an increased risk of developing not only myocardial infarction, but also restenosis of the reconstruction zone, as well as the associated ischemic stroke, which was demonstrated by our results.CONCLUSION: Patients with type 2 diabetes and a history of CEE are at increased risk of ischemic stroke at the hospital stage of observation and all unfavorable cardiovascular conditions (death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, restenosis or ICA occlusion in the reconstruction zone) in the long-term postoperative period.

[1]  K. P. Chernykh,et al.  Glomus-saving carotid endarterectomy by A. N. Kazantsev. Hospital and medium-remote results , 2020, Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya.

[2]  R. Lider,et al.  Novel method for glomus-saving carotid endarterectomy sensu A. N. Kazantsev: cutting the internal carotid artery on the site from external and common carotid artery , 2020, Russian Journal of Cardiology.

[3]  В. Ю. Семёнов,et al.  Об опыте работы по осуществлению функций головного центра по профилю «сердечно-сосудистая хирургия» , 2020 .

[4]  A. Kutikhin,et al.  [Progression of precerebral atherosclerosis and predictors of ischemic complications in cardiac patients]. , 2020, Khirurgiia.

[5]  A. V. Gavrilenko,et al.  [Meta-analysis of the results of eversion carotid endarterectomy and endarterectomy with patch plasty]. , 2020, Angiologiia i sosudistaia khirurgiia = Angiology and vascular surgery.

[6]  A. V. Mironov,et al.  Morphological features of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy with diepoxide-treated xenopericardial patch angioplasty , 2020, Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya.

[7]  Романцова Татьяна Ивановна,et al.  Симптомная и асимптомная ишемия головного мозга (по данным МРТ) у больных сахарным диабетом 2 типа после каротидной реваскуляризации , 2019 .

[8]  S. Kwon,et al.  Comparison of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy between type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients with significant carotid stenosis , 2019, Cardiovascular Diabetology.

[9]  G. D. de Borst,et al.  Risk of insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy , 2018, Journal of vascular surgery.

[10]  R. Tarasov,et al.  [In-hospital outcomes of transcutaneous coronary intervention and carotid endarterectomy in hybrid and staged regimens]. , 2019, Angiologiia i sosudistaia khirurgiia = Angiology and vascular surgery.

[11]  R. Vinogradov,et al.  [Perioperative complications prognosis in carotid endarterectomy]. , 2018, Khirurgiia.

[12]  А. И. Ануфриев,et al.  ХИРУРГИЧЕСКОЕ ЛЕЧЕНИЕ МУЛЬТИФОКАЛЬНОГО АТЕРОСКЛЕРОЗА: ПАТОЛОГИЯ КОРОНАРНОГО И БРАХИОЦЕФАЛЬНОГО БАССЕЙНОВ И ПРЕДИКТОРЫ РАЗВИТИЯ РАННИХ НЕБЛАГОПРИЯТНЫХ СОБЫТИЙ , 2017 .

[13]  О. Л. Барбараш,et al.  ИДЕНТИФИКАЦИЯ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЛЬНО МЕТИЛИРОВАННЫХ ГЕНОВ, ПОТЕНЦИАЛЬНО СВЯЗАННЫХ С АТЕРОСКЛЕРОЗОМ У ЧЕЛОВЕКА , 2017 .

[14]  Статья Редакционная ПРАВИЛА ОФОРМЛЕНИЯ СТАТЕЙ ДЛЯ АВТОРОВ ЖУРНАЛА ПАТОЛОГИЯ КРОВООБРАЩЕНИЯ И КАРДИОХИРУРГИЯ , 2016 .

[15]  Kalinin Aa,et al.  Clinical and ultrasonic predictors of postoperative complications after carotid endarterectomy , 2015 .

[16]  Татьяна Николаевна Мошель,et al.  Оценка отдалённых результатов лечения генерализованного пародонтита с применением антибактериальных, иммунобиологических и остеотропных препаратов , 2014 .

[17]  O. Kamenskaya,et al.  Vascular channel reserves in patients with systemic atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2013 .

[18]  S. Gracheva,et al.  Prevalence of combined atherosclerotic vascular lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus , 2012 .

[19]  Гришин Олег Витальевич,et al.  Психогенная одышка и гипокапния у больных ишемической болезнью сердца до и после коронарного шунтирования Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия , 2012 .

[20]  В. А. Кубышкин,et al.  Ингибиторы протонной помпы в лечении синдрома Золлингера-Эллисона// Хирургия. Журнал им , 2012 .

[21]  M. Sh Распространенность сочетанного атеросклеротического поражения сосудов у больных сахарным диабетом , 2012 .

[22]  С. П. Мироненко,et al.  Хирургическое лечение мультифокального атеросклероза , 2006 .