Adapting TOUGH2 for general equations of state with application to geological storage of CO2

The currently distributed version of the heat and mass flow model, TOUGH2, requires that pressure be a primary variable. This may limit the functionality and efficiency of the program, both in terms of convergence properties and ease of programming. TOUGH2 was adapted to allow for a general choice of independent (primary) variables. The changes to the code include increasing the size of the secondary parameter array for storage of pressure and changing the references to pressure in the flow equation module. Testing showed that the new code accurately replicates results of the original code. The program was applied to problems of relevance to geological storage of CO2 using the modified code (D-EOS), and the original code (P-EOS), as primary variables. Two scenarios, addition of heat and addition of mass, were simulated using both versions of TOUGH2. The simulations produced very similar results; however, in most instances, the density-based routine solved the problems faster and satisfied analytical constraints placed on the problems more accurately than the pressure-based runs. It was generally the case that the greater the modelled pressure gradients the better D-EOS performed. The new formulation adds flexibility to TOUGH2, both in terms of improved convergence behaviour and ease of programming. The new flexibility to choose any primary variables which uniquely specify the equilibrium state of a system allows for increased efficiencies in coding EOS routines, and may have important consequences in optimization of the solution of the flow equations for a given problem.

[1]  R. Lefebvre,et al.  Multiphase transfer processes in waste rock piles producing acid mine drainage 2. Applications of numerical simulation. , 2001, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[2]  Karsten Pruess Numerical simulation of `multiphase tracer transport in fractured geothermal reservoirs , 2002 .

[3]  C. Doughty,et al.  A similarity solution for two-phase fluid and heat flow near high-level nuclear waste packages emplaced in porous media , 1990 .

[4]  M Nastev,et al.  Gas production and migration in landfills and geological materials. , 2001, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[5]  Stephen P. White,et al.  Reservoir storage and containment of greenhouse gases , 1995 .

[6]  G. J. Moridis,et al.  Flow and transport simulations using T2CG1, a package of conjugate gradient solvers for the TOUGH2 family of codes , 1995 .

[7]  Michael O'Sullivan,et al.  State-of-the-art of geothermal reservoir simulation , 2001 .

[8]  Stefan Bachu,et al.  Geological Sequestration of Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin: Suitability Analysis , 2002 .

[9]  Brian McPherson,et al.  Overpressures in the Uinta Basin, Utah: Analysis using a three‐dimensional basin evolution model , 2001 .

[10]  W. Wagner,et al.  A New Equation of State for Carbon Dioxide Covering the Fluid Region from the Triple‐Point Temperature to 1100 K at Pressures up to 800 MPa , 1996 .

[11]  Roland Span,et al.  Multiparameter equations of state — recent trends and future challenges , 2001 .

[12]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  Process Modeling of CO2 Injection into Natural Gas Reservoirs for Carbon Sequestration and Enhanced Gas Recovery , 2001 .

[13]  K. Pruess,et al.  TOUGH2 User's Guide Version 2 , 1999 .

[14]  S. G. Penoncello,et al.  18 Multiparameter equations of state , 2000 .

[15]  Y S Wu,et al.  On the selection of primary variables in numerical formulation for modeling multiphase flow in porous media. , 2001, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[16]  W. Wakeham,et al.  The Transport Properties of Carbon Dioxide , 1990 .

[17]  Erik Elmroth,et al.  High Performance Computations for Large Scale Simulations of Subsurface Multiphase Fluid and Heat Flow , 2004, The Journal of Supercomputing.