Recovery from blocking achieved by extinguishing the blocking CS

Extinction-induced attenuation of single-phase and two-phase blocking was examined with rats in a conditioned lick-suppression task. In Experiment 1, which compared the effectiveness of single- and two-phase blocking, it was found that single-phase blocking was facilitated by the initiation of training with an A-US trial rather than an AX-US trial. Single-phase (but not two-phase) blocking was attenuated as a result of 200 extinction trials with the blocking stimulus (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 revealed recovery from two-phase blocking after 800 extinction trials with the blocking stimulus. Recovery from both types of blocking was specific to the blocked CS trained in compound with the extinguished stimulus (Experiment 4). This is the first article to report that the blocking deficit can be reversed by extinguishing the blocking stimulus. These results are discussed in light of acquisition models (i.e., retrospective revaluation) and expression models (i.e., the comparator hypothesis).

[1]  L. Kamin.  Attention-like processes in classical conditioning , 1967 .

[2]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[3]  N. Mackintosh.  A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[4]  J. Pearce,et al.  A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. , 1980 .

[5]  R. Bolles,et al.  A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing , 1981 .

[6]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Blocking as a Retrieval Failure: Reactivation of Associations to a Blocked Stimulus , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[7]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Reminder-induced recovery of associations to an overshadowed stimulus , 1982 .

[8]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Reminder-induced recovery from blocking as a function of the number of compound trials , 1983 .

[9]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus. , 1985 .

[10]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Information processing in animals : conditioned inhibition , 1985 .

[11]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Contingency Effects with Maintained Instrumental Reinforcement , 1985 .

[12]  D. Shanks.  Forward and Backward Blocking in Human Contingency Judgement , 1985 .

[13]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Associative effects of US preexposure: modulation of conditioned responding by an excitatory training context. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[14]  J. Pearce.  A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. , 1987, Psychological review.

[15]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Covariation in conditioned response strength between stimuli trained in compound , 1987 .

[16]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. , 1988 .

[17]  N. Spear,et al.  Expression of a taste aversion conditioned with an odor-taste compound: Overshadowing is relatively weak in weanlings and decreases over a retention interval in adults , 1988 .

[18]  G. Chapman,et al.  Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of other cues present during training of that specific stimulus. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[20]  Extinction of Comparator Stimuli during and after Acquisition: Differential Facilitative Effects on Pavlovian Responding , 1993 .

[21]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Local context and the comparator hypothesis , 1993 .

[22]  Douglas A. Williams,et al.  Configural and elemental strategies in predictive learning , 1994 .

[23]  Robert C. Barnet,et al.  Latent inhibition as a performance deficit resulting from CS—context associations , 1994 .

[24]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Cue Competition in Causality Judgments: The Role of Nonpresentation of Compound Stimulus Elements , 1994 .

[25]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Effect of relative stimulus validity: learning or performance deficit? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[26]  Douglas A. Williams,et al.  Associative and Normative Accounts of Negative Transfer , 1995 .

[27]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Reminder-induced attenuation of the effect of relative stimulus validity , 1996 .

[29]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Within Compound Associations Mediate the Retrospective Revaluation of Causality Judgements , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[30]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Biological Significance as a Determinant of Cue Competition , 1996 .

[31]  Retention of Context Blocking in Taste-Aversion Learning 1 1 Portions of this report were presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society Meeting in St. Louis, November, 1994. , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[32]  Spontaneous Recovery from the Effect of Relative Stimulus Validity , 1997 .

[33]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: support for the comparator hypothesis. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[34]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Renewal of Comparator Stimuli , 1998 .

[35]  Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: Support for the comparator hypothesis. , 1998 .