Enhancement of spatial thinking with Virtual Spaces 1.0

Developing a software environment to enhance 3D geometric proficiency demands the consideration of theoretical views of the learning process. Simultaneously, this effort requires taking into account the range of tools that technology offers, as well as their limitations. In this paper, we report on the design of Virtual Spaces 1.0 software, a program that exercises the user's abilities to build spatial images and to manipulate them. This paper also reports on a study that aimed to assess whether those abilities affected achievements in the spatial thinking of 10th graders who worked with the software. Additionally, we investigated whether self-regulating questions can improve the effect of exercising with Virtual Spaces 1.0. The sample was 192 students, who were randomly assigned to four groups, two of which used Virtual Spaces 1.0 (Group 1 with virtual reality and self-regulating questions N=52, Group 2 with virtual realty only N=52) and the other two the non-Virtual Spaces 1.0 (Group 3 self-regulating questions only N=45, Group 4 non-treatment group N=45). The results suggest that spatial thinking was enhanced by exercising with Virtual Spaces 1.0 and asking self-regulating questions. In addition, it was found that the self-regulating questions make the use of virtual reality more efficient, and that the influence of self-regulating questions is especially manifested in tasks that make use of high order skills.

[1]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  AI in Reverse: Computer Tools That Turn Cognitive , 1988 .

[2]  Bracha Kramarski,et al.  Effects of Multilevel Versus Unilevel Metacognitive Training on Mathematical Reasoning , 2001 .

[3]  Daniel B. M. Haun What's so special about spatial cognition , 2003 .

[4]  Nigel Foreman,et al.  Spatial cognition in the child and adult , 1997 .

[5]  Luis Radford,et al.  On the relevance of Semiotics in Mathematics Education , 2002 .

[6]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[7]  Kyoung Shin Park,et al.  Effects of Guided and Unguided Style Learning on User Attention in a Virtual Environment , 2006, Edutainment.

[8]  Wayne L. Shebilske,et al.  Virtual Reality: An Instructional Medium for Visual-Spatial Tasks. , 1992 .

[9]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  R. Azevedo Using Hypermedia as a Metacognitive Tool for Enhancing Student Learning? The Role of Self-Regulated Learning , 2005 .

[11]  D. Clements Geometric and Spatial Thinking in Young Children. , 1998 .

[12]  Robert Cohen,et al.  The Development of spatial cognition , 1985 .

[13]  Keith Jones Theoretical frameworks for the learning of geometrical reasoning , 1998 .

[14]  Chris Dede,et al.  The design of immersive virtual learning environments: Fostering deep understandings of complex scientific knowledge. , 2000 .

[15]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theoretical perspectives , 2001 .

[16]  Barbara J. Dougherty,et al.  Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education , 2020 .

[17]  Peter F. Elzer,et al.  Three-dimensional representation of process values , 1999, HCI.

[18]  D. Cunningham Beyond educational psychology: Steps toward an educational semiotic , 1992 .

[19]  Magda B. Arnold,et al.  Memory and the brain , 1984 .

[20]  S. Stein What's All the Fuss About? , 1996 .

[21]  Cindy Garrity Does the Use of Hands-On Learning, with Manipulatives, Improve the Test Scores of Secondary Education Geometry Students?. , 1998 .

[22]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Development of a Structured Interview for Assessing Student Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies , 1986 .

[23]  Jaron Lanier,et al.  An Insider's View of the Future of Virtual Reality , 1992 .

[24]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The role of metacognitive processes in the regulation of memory performance. , 1998 .

[25]  Mark L. Merickel A Study of the Relationship between Virtual Reality (Perceived Realism) and the Ability of Children To Create, Manipulate and Utilize Mental Images for Spatially Related Problem Solving. , 1992 .

[26]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Virtual Environments and the Enhancement of Spatial Behavior: Towards a Comprehensive Research Agenda , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[27]  Angel Gutiérrez,et al.  Visualization in 3-Dimensional Geometry: In Search of a Framework , 2001 .

[28]  M. Battista On Greeno's environmental/model view of conceptual domains: A spatial/geometric perspective , 1994 .

[29]  Thomas E. Dawson,et al.  Acquiring new spatial intuitions: Learning to reason about rotations , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  D. Olson,et al.  Spatial Cognition: The Structure and Development of Mental Representations of Spatial Relations , 1983 .

[31]  I. S. Yakimanskaya,et al.  The Development of Spatial Thinking in Schoolchildren. Soviet Studies in Mathematics Education. Volume 3. , 1991 .

[32]  Rodney A. Nason,et al.  VRMath: A 3D Microworld for Learning 3D Geometry , 2004 .

[33]  Rodney A. Nason,et al.  Toward a Semiotic Framework for Using Technology in Mathematics Education: The Case of Learning 3D Geometry , 2004 .

[34]  B. Zimmerman Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis , 2001 .

[35]  Michael Otte,et al.  Mathematical Epistemology from a Peircean Semiotic Point of View , 2006 .

[36]  Mary Montgomery Lindquist,et al.  Learning and teaching geometry, K-12 , 1987 .

[37]  Michael A. Forrester,et al.  Psychology of the Image , 2000 .

[38]  Robert Kozma,et al.  Innovations in Science and Mathematics Education: Advanced Designs for Technologies of Learning. , 2000 .

[39]  Eleanor Armour-Thomas,et al.  Construct Validation of Metacognition , 1993 .

[40]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  The Virtual Reality Mental Rotation Spatial Skills Project , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[41]  Zhao Xiu-fang Spatial cognition in virtual environment , 2009 .

[42]  J. R. Wilson,et al.  Cognitive Abilities: Use of Family Data as a Control to Assess Sex and Age Differences in Two Ethnic Groups , 1975, International journal of aging & human development.

[43]  Helen Graham Gurny High School Students' Performance on Vandenberg's Mental Rotations Test: Art Ability, Gender, Activities, Academic Performance, Strategies, and Ease of Taking the Test. , 2003 .

[44]  Chronis Kynigos,et al.  CONSTRUCTING A SINUSOIDAL PERIODIC COVARIATION , .

[45]  Douglas J. Hacker,et al.  Metacognition in educational theory and practice. , 1998 .

[46]  C. Laborde Dynamic Geometry Environments as a Source of Rich Learning Contexts for the Complex Activity of Proving , 2000 .

[47]  Michel Denis,et al.  Image and cognition , 1991 .

[48]  Descriptors Algebra,et al.  Group for the Psychology of Mathematics , 2000 .

[49]  Nicholas Jackiw,et al.  The Geometer’s Sketchpad , 2008 .

[50]  Regina Vollmeyer,et al.  A Surprising Effect of Feedback on Learning. , 2005 .

[51]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Technology Meets Constructivism: Do They Make a Marriage? , 1991 .

[52]  Keith Jones,et al.  Developing the 3DMath dynamic geometry software: theoretical perspectives on design , 2006 .

[53]  A. Schoenfeld Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education , 1987 .

[54]  Peggy Noel Van Meter,et al.  The Metacognition of College Studentship: A Grounded Theory Approach , 1998 .

[55]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism: new implications for instructional technology? , 1991 .

[56]  Tandi Clausen-May,et al.  Teaching Maths to Pupils with Different Learning Styles , 2005 .