Geometric feedback control of discrete‐deposition SFF systems

Purpose – New applications of solid freeform fabrication (SFF) are arising, such as functional rapid prototyping and in situ fabrication, which push SFF to its limits in terms of geometrical fidelity due to the applications' inherent process uncertainties. Current closed‐loop feedback control schemes monitor and manipulate SFF techniques at the process level, e.g. envelope temperature, feed rate. “Closing the loop” on the process level, instead of the overall part geometry level, leads to limitations in the types of errors that can be detected and corrected. The purpose of this paper is to propose a technique called greedy geometric feedback (GGF) control which “closes the loop” on the overall part geometry level.Design/methodology/approach – The overall part geometry is monitored throughout the print and, using a greedy algorithm, real‐time decisions are made to serially determine the locations of subsequent droplets, i.e. overall part geometry is directly manipulated. A computer simulator and a physical...

[1]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Direct Freeform Fabrication of Seeded Hydrogels in Arbitrary Geometries , 2022 .

[2]  H. Lipson Homemade [fabrication technology] , 2005, IEEE Spectrum.

[3]  J. Mazumder,et al.  Direct materials deposition: designed macro and microstructure , 1998 .

[4]  W. Hennink,et al.  Hydrogels as extracellular matrices for skeletal tissue engineering: state-of-the-art and novel application in organ printing. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[5]  M. J. Lovelady,et al.  Closed loop feedback for continuous mode materials jetting [solder/adhesives] , 1999, Twenty Fourth IEEE/CPMT International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium (Cat. No.99CH36330).

[6]  Harris L. Marcus,et al.  In Situ Thermocouples in Macro-Components Fabricated Using SALD and SALDVI Techniques. III. Fabrication and Properties of the SiC/C Thermocouple Device , 1998 .

[7]  Radovan Kovacevic,et al.  Improving solid freeform fabrication by laser-based additive manufacturing , 2002 .

[8]  Julie A. Ray,et al.  Are We There Yet? ... Developing In Situ Fabrication and Repair (ISFR) Technologies to Explore and Live on the Moon and Mars , 2005 .

[9]  Charalabos C. Doumanidis,et al.  Distributed-Parameter Modeling for Geometry Control of Manufacturing Processes With Material Deposition , 2000 .

[10]  Frank W. Liou,et al.  Control of Laser Cladding for Rapid Prototyping-A Review , 2001 .

[11]  Karen M. Taminger,et al.  Solid Freeform Fabrication: An Enabling Technology for Future Space Missions , 2002 .

[12]  Eric J. Whitney Advances in Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing Using Laser‐Based Solid Free‐Form Fabrication , 2004 .

[13]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Functional Freeform Fabrication for Physical Artificial Life , 2004 .

[14]  Daniel Noyes,et al.  Envisioning e-logistics developments: Making spare parts in situ and on demand: State of the art and guidelines for future developments , 2006, Comput. Ind..

[15]  K. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Functional metal, ceramic, and composite prototypes by solid freeform fabrication , 2000 .

[16]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Freeform fabrication of zinc‐air batteries and electromechanical assemblies , 2004 .

[17]  Kenneth Cooper,et al.  Free Form Fabrication in Space , 2004 .

[18]  R. Fabbro,et al.  Process control applied to laser surface remelting , 1997 .

[19]  C. Doumanidis,et al.  Geometry Modeling and Control by Infrared and Laser Sensing in Thermal Manufacturing with Material Deposition , 2001 .