Artificial activation of porcine oocytes matured in vitro

These studies were undertaken to understand the biological basis of artificially induced activation of meiotic metaphase II oocytes and to develop a source of oocytes as recipients for cloning by nuclear transfer. In vitro matured porcine oocytes were pulsed with various voltages of electricity and evalulated for pronuclear formation. The percentage of eggs that activated was significantly greater for the higher voltages. The effect on activation of the temperature of the ovaries returning from the abattoir was evaluated and it was found that oocytes derived from ovaries returning at 29°C activated at lower rates (45.5%) than those returning at 36°C (78.9%). An experiment was designed to evaluate the pH of electroporation medium (EM) and the duration of exposure to EM on activation. Oocytes were placed in EM at various pHs for 5 minutes, pulsed, and immediately removed to TL‐Hepes or allowed an additional 2 minutes in EM prior to rinsing in TL‐Hepes. The results indicate an optimum activation rate at a pH of 7.0 and allowing the additional 2 minutes in EM. Additional glucosamine (5 mM) had no affect on development of the oocyte to metaphase but reduced the percent pronuclear formation from 61% and 47%. A final experiment evaluated the developmental competence of oocytes subjected to a optimum combination of the above treatments and illustrated that a significant portion of the activated oocytes can show limited signs of cleavage. Thus in vitro matured pig oocytes can be induced to activate at high rates.

[1]  R. Prather,et al.  Development of one-cell porcine embryos to the blastocyst stage in simple media. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[2]  N. First,et al.  Response of porcine oocytes to electrical and chemical activation during maturation in vitro , 1991, Molecular reproduction and development.

[3]  J. Ozil The parthenogenetic development of rabbit oocytes after repetitive pulsatile electrical stimulation. , 1990, Development.

[4]  G. A. Hofmann,et al.  Electrical activation of mouse oocytes. , 1989, Theriogenology.

[5]  R. Prather,et al.  Nuclear transplantation in early pig embryos. , 1989, Biology of reproduction.

[6]  V. Hascall,et al.  Synthesis and accumulation of hyaluronic acid and proteoglycans in the mouse cumulus cell-oocyte complex during follicle-stimulating hormone-induced mucification. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[7]  S. Willadsen Cloning of sheep and cow embryos. , 1989, Genome.

[8]  S. Stice,et al.  Nuclear reprogramming in nuclear transplant rabbit embryos. , 1988, Biology of reproduction.

[9]  D. G. Cran,et al.  Initiation of the cortical reaction in hamster and sheep oocytes in response to inositol trisphosphate. , 1988, Journal of cell science.

[10]  Randall,et al.  Nuclear transplantation in the bovine embryo: assessment of donor nuclei and recipient oocyte. , 1987, Biology of reproduction.

[11]  M. Surani,et al.  Experimental reconstruction of mouse eggs and embryos: an analysis of mammalian development. , 1987, Biology of reproduction.

[12]  S. Willadsen,et al.  Nuclear transplantation in sheep embryos , 1986, Nature.

[13]  R. Moor,et al.  Temperature-induced abnormalities in sheep oocytes during maturation. , 1985, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[14]  B. Bavister,et al.  Development of preimplantation embryos of the golden hamster in a defined culture medium. , 1983, Biology of reproduction.