Low-dose mivacurium supplementation of prilocaine i.v. regional anaesthesia.

We have compared in two groups of five healthy volunteers, the motor effect of prilocaine i.v. regional anaesthesia of the forearm with and without addition of mivacurium 0.6 mg. Although addition of mivacurium might, theoretically, provide the benefit of increased neuromuscular block with rapid plasma cholinesterase degradation in the isolated limb, we observed prolonged forearm weakness in the mivacurium group using tests of grip strength (median recovery to 90% of control, 80 min (range 60 min to > 8 h) vs control median recovery to 90% of 16 (8-24) min) and bead transfer (median recovery to 90% of control 36 (24-48) min vs control median recovery to 90% of 12 (8-16) min). This weakness was considerably in excess of that predicted by rapid systemic degradation of mivacurium. The mivacurium group experienced symptoms of local anaesthetic toxicity which did not occur in the control group and which could not be replicated by administration of mivacurium alone.

[1]  A. England,et al.  Rate of‘onset’ and‘offset’ of four non‐depolarising neuromuscular blocking drugs , 1995, Anaesthesia.

[2]  P. F. Shannon Neuromuscular block and tourniquets. , 1994, British Journal of Anaesthesia.

[3]  M. Elhakim,et al.  Addition of atracurium to lidocaine for intravenous regional anaesthesia , 1994, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[4]  E. M. Brown,et al.  Intravenous regional anaesthesia (Bier block): review of 20 years’ experience , 1989, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[5]  R. McGlone,et al.  The use of muscle relaxant to supplement local anaesthetics for Bier's blocks. , 1988, Archives of emergency medicine.

[6]  T. Torda,et al.  The regional use of muscle relaxants. , 1966, Anesthesiology.