Dynamic Evolution of Magnetic Flux Ropes in Active Region 11429. I. EUV Observations

Studying the formation and dynamic evolution of the magnetic flux rope (MFR) is key to understanding the physics of most solar eruptions. In the present study, we investigate the dynamic evolution of four MFRs, which involve in a major eruption. The MFR1, which represents as filament (F1), first appears about 31 hr before the major eruption. The MFR2 appears as a hot-channel with a small filament (F2) in its east part. The hot-channel becomes intermittently visible about 2 hr before the major eruption. The MFR3 is formed by the reconnection between MFR1 and MFR2. The annular components of MFR3 along the MFR2 part appear as a hollow helical structure from the background with the temperature of several MK after the reconnection. Coronal material then flows along the hollow structure from MFR1 part to MFR2 part to form a new filament (F3), which is hosted by MFR3 and acts as the axial component of MFR3 in the following evolution. The MFR4 appears during MFR3's eruption phase as conjugated extreme ultraviolet (EUV) brightenings. Both brightenings extend outward into irregular ribbons with conjugate EUV dimmings inside. Meanwhile, an erupted hot-channel, which roots in the conjugated brightening, is identified. The morphology of the MFRs are also profiled by four associated flare ribbon pairs. The on-disk observations shed light on our understanding of the topology of the MFRs and their formation and eruption. Further work should lay emphasis on the magnetic environment for the MFR formation and evolution.

[1]  T. Bastian,et al.  Multiwavelength Observations of the Formation and Eruption of a Complex Filament , 2021 .

[2]  T. Bastian,et al.  Radio Spectral Imaging of an M8.4 Eruptive Solar Flare: Possible Evidence of a Termination Shock , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.

[3]  X. Cheng,et al.  Evolution of the Toroidal Flux of CME Flux Ropes during Eruption , 2020, Innovation.

[4]  Guannan Gao,et al.  Magnetic Reconnection Invoked by Sweeping of the CME-driven Fast-mode Shock , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[5]  X. Cheng,et al.  Decoding the Pre-Eruptive Magnetic Field Configurations of Coronal Mass Ejections , 2020, Space Science Reviews.

[6]  Q. Hu,et al.  Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of Magnetic Null-point Reconnections and Coronal Dimmings during the X2.1 Flare in NOAA AR 11283 , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[7]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Recurring Homologous Solar Eruptions in NOAA AR 11429 , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[8]  A. Veronig,et al.  Development of a Confined Circular-Cum-Parallel Ribbon Flare and Associated Pre-Flare Activity , 2020, Solar Physics.

[9]  V. Yurchyshyn,et al.  Hard X-Ray Emission from an Activated Flux Rope and Subsequent Evolution of an Eruptive Long-duration Solar Flare , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[10]  B. Joshi,et al.  Identification of Pre-flare Processes and Their Possible Role in Driving a Large-scale Flux Rope Eruption with Complex M-class Flare in the Active Region NOAA 12371 , 2020, 2002.05890.

[11]  A. Veronig,et al.  A Hot Cusp-shaped Confined Solar Flare , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[12]  B. Tan,et al.  Quasi-periodic Pulsations before and during a Solar Flare in AR 12242 , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[13]  J. Wang,et al.  Multiple Magnetic Reconnections Driven by a Large-scale Magnetic Flux Rope , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[14]  G. Aulanier,et al.  Drifting of the line-tied footpoints of CME flux-ropes , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[15]  J. Zhang,et al.  A Study of a Compound Solar Eruption with Two Consecutive Erupting Magnetic Structures , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[16]  W. Gan,et al.  Determination of Differential Emission Measure from Solar Extreme Ultraviolet Images , 2018 .

[17]  Hongqi Zhang,et al.  Evolution of relative magnetic helicity: New boundary conditions for the vector potential , 2017, 1712.09219.

[18]  Q. Hu,et al.  Buildup of a highly twisted magnetic flux rope during a solar eruption , 2017, Nature Communications.

[19]  A. Veronig,et al.  Generation Mechanisms of Quasi-parallel and Quasi-circular Flare Ribbons in a Confined Flare , 2017, 1708.08612.

[20]  X. Cheng,et al.  Origin and structures of solar eruptions I: Magnetic flux rope , 2017, Science China Earth Sciences.

[21]  J. Qiu,et al.  Gradual Solar Coronal Dimming and Evolution of Coronal Mass Ejectionin the Early Phase , 2017, 1707.02480.

[22]  Y. Moon,et al.  FORMATION AND ERUPTION OF A FLUX ROPE FROM THE SIGMOID ACTIVE REGION NOAA 11719 AND ASSOCIATED M6.5 FLARE: A MULTI-WAVELENGTH STUDY , 2016, 1701.00967.

[23]  H. Ji,et al.  Pre-flare coronal dimmings , 2016, 1611.08371.

[24]  X. Cheng,et al.  On the Characteristics of Footpoints of Solar Magnetic Flux Ropes during the Eruption , 2016, 1605.04047.

[25]  K. Tsinganos,et al.  The spectroscopic imprint of the pre-eruptive configuration resulting into two major coronal mass ejections , 2016, 1602.03680.

[26]  D. Gary,et al.  Particle acceleration by a solar flare termination shock , 2015, Science.

[27]  H. Morgan,et al.  Multi-Scale Gaussian Normalization for Solar Image Processing , 2014, Solar physics.

[28]  P. Romano,et al.  Twist and Writhe of the Magnetic Flux in the Super Active Region NOAA 11429 , 2014 .

[29]  P. Démoulin,et al.  The standard flare model in three dimensions - III. Slip-running reconnection properties , 2013, 1305.4053.

[30]  P. Démoulin,et al.  The standard flare model in three dimensions II: upper limit on solar flare energy , 2012, 1212.2086.

[31]  Y. Guo,et al.  Understanding the white-light flare on 2012 March 9: evidence of a two-step magnetic reconnection , 2012, 1211.1751.

[32]  M. Janvier,et al.  The standard flare model in three dimensions - I. Strong-to-weak shear transition in post-flare loops , 2012 .

[33]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Observation of an evolving magnetic flux rope before and during a solar eruption , 2012, Nature Communications.

[34]  B. Schmieder,et al.  Evidence of Magnetic Helicity in Emerging Flux and Associated Flare , 2009, 0906.1210.

[35]  Y. Fan,et al.  The Evolving Sigmoid: Evidence for Magnetic Flux Ropes in the Corona Before, During, and After CMES , 2007 .

[36]  D. Alexander,et al.  Hard X-Ray Production in a Failed Filament Eruption , 2006 .

[37]  S. Antiochos,et al.  Solar Prominence Merging , 2006 .

[38]  Jean-Pierre Wuelser,et al.  EUVI: the STEREO-SECCHI extreme ultraviolet imager , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[39]  T. Török,et al.  Ideal kink instability of a magnetic loop equilibrium , 2003, astro-ph/0311198.

[40]  Haimin Wang,et al.  The Formation of a Prominence in Active Region NOAA 8668. I. SOHO/MDI Observations of Magnetic Field Evolution , 2001 .

[41]  H. Hudson,et al.  Onset of the Magnetic Explosion in Solar Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections , 2001 .

[42]  C. J. Wolfson,et al.  Sun Earth Connection Coronal and Heliospheric Investigation (SECCHI) , 2000, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[43]  P. Chen,et al.  An Emerging Flux Trigger Mechanism for Coronal Mass Ejections , 2000 .

[44]  Spiro K. Antiochos,et al.  Dynamical Formation and Stability of Helical Prominence Magnetic Fields , 2000 .

[45]  S. Antiochos,et al.  A Model for Solar Coronal Mass Ejections , 1998, astro-ph/9807220.

[46]  T. Forbes,et al.  A catastrophe mechanism for coronal mass ejections , 1991 .

[47]  E. Priest,et al.  A twisted flux-tube model for solar prominences. I. General properties , 1989 .

[48]  Petrus C. H. Martens,et al.  Formation and eruption of solar prominences , 1989 .

[49]  T. Forbes,et al.  A Shock Condensation Mechanism for Loop Prominences , 1986 .

[50]  P. Sturrock Model of the High-Energy Phase of Solar Flares , 1966, Nature.

[51]  Thuy Mai,et al.  Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) , 2015 .

[52]  C. J. Wolfson,et al.  The Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) , 2011 .

[53]  S. Antiochos,et al.  The magnetic field of solar prominences , 1994 .