Bayesian Operational Modal Analysis of a Pedestrian Bridge Using a Field Test with Multiple Setups

An ambient vibration test was conducted for the pedestrian bridge that links the City University (CityU) of Hong Kong and the adjacent subway station. In this test, 100 locations forming a net of measurement were selected. Due to the limited number of sensors available, 10 setups were designed to cover all the degrees of freedom (dofs) of interest. A recently developed Bayesian method incorporating multiple setups was used to analyze the collected data. Besides the most probable values (MPVs) of modal parameters, the associated posterior uncertainty was also calculated analytically without resorting to the finite difference method. Six modes were identified, including some local modes of specified spans and global modes, and compared with those identified in a previous study. The difficulty encountered in the field test is discussed, along with some interesting features. Practical interpretation of the statistics of modal parameters calculated from frequentist and Bayesian context is also discussed. After the field test, a lift was installed between the ground and the bridge deck, which changed the modal properties of the original structure. This study provides a baseline of the dynamic characteristics of the original structure for future safety assessment.

[1]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Fast Bayesian FFT Method for Ambient Modal Identification with Separated Modes , 2011 .

[2]  B. Peeters,et al.  Stochastic System Identification for Operational Modal Analysis: A Review , 2001 .

[3]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Experimental methods for estimating modal mass in footbridges using human-induced dynamic excitation , 2007 .

[4]  Edwin Reynders,et al.  System Identification Methods for (Operational) Modal Analysis: Review and Comparison , 2012 .

[5]  Hui Li,et al.  Damage Detection for SMC Benchmark Problem: A Subspace-Based Approach , 2016 .

[6]  Christian Frier,et al.  Sensitivity of Footbridge Vibrations to Stochastic Walking Parameters , 2010 .

[7]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Ambient interference in long-term monitoring of buildings , 2010 .

[8]  Ting-Hua Yi,et al.  Sensor Placement Optimization in Structural Health Monitoring Using Niching Monkey Algorithm , 2014 .

[9]  S. Au.  Fast Bayesian ambient modal identification in the frequency domain, Part I: Posterior most probable value , 2012 .

[10]  Paul Reynolds,et al.  Modal testing and FE model tuning of a lively footbridge structure , 2006 .

[11]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Full-scale dynamic testing and modal identification of a coupled floor slab system , 2012 .

[12]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Bayesian operational modal analysis: Theory, computation, practice , 2013 .

[13]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition , 2001 .

[14]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Ambient modal identification of a primary-secondary structure by Fast Bayesian FFT method , 2012 .

[15]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Ambient vibration re-testing and operational modal analysis of the Humber Bridge , 2010 .

[16]  Lin Li,et al.  Damage detection method for shear buildings using the changes in the first mode shape slopes , 2011 .

[17]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Development of a practical algorithm for Bayesian model updating of a coupled slab system utilizing field test data , 2014 .

[18]  Heung-Fai Lam,et al.  Use of Measured Vibration of In-Situ Sleeper for Detecting Underlying Railway Ballast Damage , 2015 .

[19]  Xilin Lu,et al.  Field dynamic test and Bayesian modal identification of a special structure – the Palms Together Dagoba , 2016 .

[20]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Fast Bayesian Ambient Modal Identification Incorporating Multiple Setups , 2012 .

[21]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Modal identification of a suspension footbridge using free vibration signatures , 2005 .

[22]  Fernando A. Branco,et al.  Modal identification of a GFRP-concrete hybrid footbridge prototype: Experimental tests and analytical and numerical simulations , 2013 .

[23]  S. Au.  Fast Bayesian ambient modal identification in the frequency domain, Part II: Posterior uncertainty , 2012 .

[24]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Damping Estimation Using Free Decays and Ambient Vibration Tests , 2010 .

[25]  Carmelo Gentile,et al.  Ambient vibration testing and structural evaluation of an historic suspension footbridge , 2008, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[26]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Identification, Model Updating, and Validation of a Steel Twin Deck Curved Cable‐Stayed Footbridge , 2014, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[27]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Assessing uncertainty in operational modal analysis incorporating multiple setups using a Bayesian approach , 2015 .

[28]  S. Sarkani,et al.  Stochastic analysis of structural and mechanical vibrations , 1996 .

[29]  Seyed Sina Kourehli.  Damage Assessment in Structures Using Incomplete Modal Data and Artificial Neural Network , 2015 .

[30]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  Phase I IASC-ASCE Structural Health Monitoring Benchmark Problem Using Simulated Data , 2004 .

[31]  Christoph Adam,et al.  A Multi-Step Approach for Identification of Structural Modifications Based on Operational Modal Analysis , 2014 .

[32]  J. Beck.  Bayesian system identification based on probability logic , 2010 .

[33]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Connecting Bayesian and frequentist quantification of parameter uncertainty in system identification , 2012 .

[34]  Heung-Fai Lam,et al.  The Bayesian methodology for the detection of railway ballast damage under a concrete sleeper , 2014 .