The impact of Oncotype DX testing on breast cancer management and chemotherapy prescribing patterns in a tertiary referral centre

Introduction The use of chemotherapy in node-negative, (O)Estrogen Receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer has changed significantly since the introduction of Oncotype DX to determine systemic recurrence risk based on tumour genomic signature. Aims This study aims to1. Document longitudinal changes in chemotherapy use,2. Assess the impact of new evidence on local protocol. Methods A cohort study was undertaken, including consecutive patients with early node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer diagnosed between 2006 and May 2013, including a period of prospective clinical trial (Trial Assigning Individualised Options for Treatment (TAILORx)) recruitment. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, tumour clinico-pathological features, Oncotype DX use and recurrence score and chemotherapy use. All therapeutic decisions were made following multidisciplinary discussion, with adherence to guidelines and consideration of trial protocol and Oncotype DX recurrence scores. Results 479 consecutive patients were included in the study, of whom 241 (50%) underwent Oncotype DX testing, 97 as part of the TAILORx clinical trial. Oncotype DX testing began on a trial basis in 2007 and until October 2011, only patients enrolled on TAILORx availed of genomic profiling. From October 2011, Oncotype DX was used in all eligible patients as per National Cancer Control Programme (NCCP) guidelines. A total of 216 (45%) patients received chemotherapy. The use of chemotherapy changed in inverse proportion to the availability of the genomic assay. Of those patients in whom Oncotype DX was utilised, 138 (57%) were spared chemotherapy. Conclusion This study validates the use of molecular testing in the rationalisation of systemic therapy.

[1]  R. Gelber,et al.  Strategies for subtypes—dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011 , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  Debjani Dutta,et al.  Measurement of gene expression in archival paraffin-embedded tissues: development and performance of a 92-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay. , 2004, The American journal of pathology.

[3]  A. Giuliano,et al.  Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. , 2011, JAMA.

[4]  M. Rezai,et al.  The 21-gene recurrence score assay impacts adjuvant therapy recommendations for ER-positive, node-negative and node-positive early breast cancer resulting in a risk-adapted change in chemotherapy use , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[6]  D. A. BRUNNING,et al.  European Journal of Cancer , 1966, Nature.

[7]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  C. Markopoulos Overview of the use of Oncotype DX® as an additional treatment decision tool in early breast cancer , 2013, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[9]  X. Chen,et al.  Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. , 2011, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[10]  M. Cronin,et al.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  B. Kohler,et al.  Women with multiple primary breast cancers diagnosed within a five year period, 1994–1998 , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[12]  W. Gradishar,et al.  Clinical validity/utility, change in practice patterns, and economic implications of risk stratifiers to predict outcomes for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  A. Di Leo,et al.  Recent advances in systemic therapy. New diagnostics and biological predictors of outcome in early breast cancer , 2009, Breast Cancer Research.

[14]  J. Sparano,et al.  TAILORx: trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx). , 2006, Clinical breast cancer.

[15]  M. Cronin,et al.  Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  N. Harbeck,et al.  Molecular and protein markers for clinical decision making in breast cancer: today and tomorrow. , 2014, Cancer treatment reviews.

[17]  M. Piccart,et al.  Controversial issues in early-stage breast cancer: a global collaborative survey, supported by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  E. Winer,et al.  NCCN Task Force Report: Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer. , 2006, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[19]  K. Czene,et al.  Estrogen Receptor Status in Relation to Risk of Contralateral Breast Cancer–A Population-Based Cohort Study , 2012, PloS one.

[20]  J. Bryant,et al.  Treatment of lymph-node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: long-term findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomised clinical trials , 2004, The Lancet.

[21]  Josh J. Carlson,et al.  The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[22]  I. Ellis,et al.  The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[23]  C. Compton,et al.  The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[24]  G. Romieu,et al.  Re: clinical validity/utility, change in practice patterns, and economic implications of risk stratifiers to predict outcomes for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[26]  A. Schneeweiss,et al.  Risk estimations and treatment decisions in early stage breast cancer: agreement among oncologists and the impact of the 70-gene signature. , 2014, European journal of cancer.

[27]  Joseph P. Costantino,et al.  Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20 , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[28]  R. Bast,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[30]  H. Heneghan,et al.  Evolution of breast cancer management in Ireland: a decade of change , 2009, BMC surgery.

[31]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials , 1998, The Lancet.

[32]  Therese Sørlie,et al.  Molecular portraits of breast cancer: tumour subtypes as distinct disease entities. , 2004, European journal of cancer.