Conformational change in the floor of the human rhinovirus canyon blocks adsorption to HeLa cell receptors

A series of eight antiviral compounds complexed with human rhinovirus 14 (HRV-14) were previously shown to displace segments of polypeptide chains in the floor of the "canyon" by as much as 0.45 nm in C-alpha positions from the native conformation (J. Badger, I. Minor, M. J. Kremer, M. A. Oliveira, T. J. Smith, J. P. Griffith, D. M. A. Guerin, S. Krishnaswamy, M. Luo, M. G. Rossman, M. A. McKinlay, G. D. Diana, F. J. Dutko, M. Fancher, R. R. Rueckert, and B. A. Heinz, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:3304-3308, 1988). Because the canyon is thought to serve as the viral receptor-binding site (M. G. Rossmann, E. Arnold, J. W. Erickson, E. A. Frankenberger, J. P. Griffith, H. J. Hecht, J. E. Johnson, G. Kamer, M. Luo, A. G. Mosser, R. R. Rueckert, B. Sherry, and G. Vriend, Nature [London] 317:145-153, 1985; M. G. Rossmann and R. R. Rueckert, Microbiol. Sci. 4:206-214, 1987), these compounds were assessed for their ability to block adsorption of HRV-14 to HeLa cell membrane receptors. In parallel experiments, the compounds were assessed directly for antiviral activity in an in vitro plaque reduction assay in intact HeLa cells. All eight compounds blocked the adsorption of 50% of HRV-14 at approximately the same concentration required to reduce the number of visible plaques by 50% (MIC). A structurally related compound which was inactive in the plaque reduction assay had no effect on HRV-14 binding. A drug-resistant mutant of HRV-14 (Leu-1188), which was less sensitive to the eight compounds in plaque reduction assays was similarly less sensitive in the adsorption assay. We propose that the conformational changes in the floor of the HRV-14 canyon induced by these compounds substantially decrease adsorption of the virion to its receptor. These results provide further evidence for the role of the HRV canyon in receptor binding.

[1]  M. Murcko,et al.  Evidence for the direct involvement of the rhinovirus canyon in receptor binding. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  R. Colonno,et al.  Characterization of human rhinoviruses displaced by an anti-receptor monoclonal antibody , 1988, Journal of virology.

[3]  M. Rossmann,et al.  Conservation of the putative receptor attachment site in picornaviruses. , 1988, Virology.

[4]  M G Rossmann,et al.  Structural analysis of a series of antiviral agents complexed with human rhinovirus 14. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Otto,et al.  Inhibition of poliovirus uncoating by disoxaril (WIN 51711). , 1987, Virology.

[6]  M. Rossmann,et al.  What does the molecular structure of viruses tell us about viral functions? , 1987, Microbiological sciences.

[7]  G Vriend,et al.  The site of attachment in human rhinovirus 14 for antiviral agents that inhibit uncoating. , 1986, Science.

[8]  M. Otto,et al.  Prevention of rhinovirus and poliovirus uncoating by WIN 51711, a new antiviral drug , 1986, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[9]  J. Tomassini,et al.  Isolation of a receptor protein involved in attachment of human rhinoviruses , 1986, Journal of virology.

[10]  R. Colonno,et al.  Isolation of a monoclonal antibody that blocks attachment of the major group of human rhinoviruses , 1986, Journal of virology.

[11]  John E. Johnson,et al.  Structure of a human common cold virus and functional relationship to other picornaviruses , 1985, Nature.

[12]  M. Otto,et al.  In vitro activity of WIN 51711, a new broad-spectrum antipicornavirus drug , 1985, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  F. H. Yin,et al.  Host range mutants of human rhinovirus in which nonstructural proteins are altered , 1983, Journal of virology.

[14]  B. Korant,et al.  Early Interaction of Rhinoviruses with Host Cells , 1972, Journal of virology.