Public engagement on urban air pollution: an exploratory study of two interventions

The use of portable sensors to measure air quality is a promising approach for the management of urban air quality given its potential to improve public participation in environmental issues and to promote healthy behaviors. However, not all the projects that use air quality mobile sensors consider the potential effects of their use on the attitudes and behaviors of non-expert individuals. This study explores the experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions of 12 participants who used a real-time NO2 sensor over a period of 7 days in the metropolitan area of Barcelona and compares them with 16 participants who did not have access to the device but rather to documentary information. The study design is based on recombined focus groups who met at the beginning and end of a 7-day activity. The results suggest that the experience with the sensors, in comparison with the traditional information, generates greater motivation among participants. Also, that the use of the sensor seems to support a more specific awareness of the problem of air pollution. In relation to risk perception, the textual and visual information seems to generate stronger beliefs of severity among participants. In both groups, beliefs of low controllability and self-efficacy are observed. Neither using the sensor nor reading the documentary information seems to contribute positively in this sense. The results of the study aim to contribute to the design of public involvement strategies in urban air pollution.

[1]  R. Jordan,et al.  Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change in Citizen‐Science Programs , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[2]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[3]  D. Dearborn,et al.  Activity Change in Response to Bad Air Quality, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007–2010 , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  Krista G. Hilchey,et al.  A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[5]  Branden B Johnson,et al.  Experience with Urban Air Pollution in Paterson, New Jersey and Implications for Air Pollution Communication , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Juana Maria Delgado-Saborit,et al.  Use of real-time sensors to characterise human exposures to combustion related pollutants. , 2012, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[7]  Daniel J. Wilson,et al.  Public perception and behavior change in relationship to hot weather and air pollution. , 2008, Environmental research.

[8]  William G. Griswold,et al.  Citisense: Mobile air quality sensing for individuals and communities Design and deployment of the Citisense mobile air-quality system , 2012, 2012 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops.

[9]  J. Fereday,et al.  Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development , 2006 .

[10]  J. Myong Health Effects of Particulate Matter , 2016 .

[11]  Helen Levy,et al.  Public Information and Avoidance Behavior : Do People Respond to Smog Alerts ? , 2003 .

[12]  Salil S. Kanhere Participatory Sensing: Crowdsourcing Data from Mobile Smartphones in Urban Spaces , 2013, ICDCIT.

[13]  Adriana Gamazo,et al.  EURYDICE (2013): Key data on teachers and school leaders in Europe. 2013 edition Eurydice report (Luxembourg Publications Office of the European Union) , 2013 .

[14]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[15]  William G. Griswold,et al.  Citisense: Mobile air quality sensing for individuals and communities Design and deployment of the Citisense mobile air-quality system , 2012, Pervasive 2012.

[16]  D. Noonan Smoggy with a Chance of Altruism: Using Air Quality Forecasts to Drive Behavioral Change , 2011 .

[17]  Gary T. Henry,et al.  Driving less for better air: Impacts of a public information campaign , 2003 .

[18]  L. Jensen,et al.  Modifications of health behaviour in response to air pollution notifications in Copenhagen. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[19]  L. Folinsbee Human health effects of air pollution. , 1993, Environmental health perspectives.

[20]  Mark H. Hansen,et al.  Participatory Sensing: A Citizen-Powered Approach to Illuminating the Patterns that Shape our World , 2009 .

[21]  Branden B Johnson,et al.  Communicating Air Quality Information: Experimental Evaluation of Alternative Formats , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Common Sense: Mobile Environmental Sensing Platforms to Support Community Action and Citizen Science , 2008 .

[23]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[24]  D. Stieb,et al.  Do smog advisories work? Results of an evaluation of the Canadian Smog Advisory Program. , 1996, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[25]  M. Kampa,et al.  Human health effects of air pollution. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[26]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research , 2012 .

[27]  J. Spadaro,et al.  Chapter 2: A framework for assessing the economic consequences of outdoor air pollution , 2016 .

[28]  A. Irwin Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development , 1995 .

[29]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Participatory sensing in public spaces: activating urban surfaces with sensor probes , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[30]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Environmental Problems and Human Behavior , 1995 .

[31]  Allen Dearry,et al.  Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[32]  Phil Brown,et al.  Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study , 2011, Environmental health perspectives.