Characterizing the Biomechanical Properties of the Pubovisceralis Muscle Using a Genetic Algorithm and the Finite Element Method.

To better understand the disorders in the pelvic cavity associated with the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) using computational models, it is fundamental to identify the biomechanical properties of these muscles. For this purpose, we implemented an optimization scheme, involving a genetic algorithm (GA) and an inverse finite element analysis (FEA), in order to estimate the material properties of the pubovisceralis muscle (PVM). The datasets of five women were included in this noninvasive analysis. The numerical models of the PVM were built from static axial magnetic resonance (MR) images, and the hyperplastic Mooney-Rivlin constitutive model was used. The material parameters obtained were compared with the ones established through a similar optimization scheme, using Powell's algorithm. To validate the values of the material parameters that characterize the passive behavior of the PVM, the displacements obtained via the numerical models with both methods were compared with dynamic MR images acquired during Valsalva maneuver. The material parameters (c1 and c2) were higher for the GA than for Powell's algorithm, but when comparing the magnitude of the displacements in millimeter of the PVM, there was only a 5% difference, and 4% for the principal logarithmic strain. The GA allowed estimating the in vivo biomechanical properties of the PVM of different subjects, requiring a lower number of simulations when compared to Powell's algorithm.

[1]  I. Ramos,et al.  Modeling the contraction of the pelvic floor muscles , 2016, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[2]  Mathias Brieu,et al.  Biomechanical properties of prolapsed or non-prolapsed vaginal tissue: impact on genital prolapse surgery , 2010, International Urogynecology Journal.

[3]  R M Natal Jorge,et al.  Study on the influence of the fetus head molding on the biomechanical behavior of the pelvic floor muscles, during vaginal delivery. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Teresa Mascarenhas,et al.  Biomechanical study on the bladder neck and urethral positions: simulation of impairment of the pelvic ligaments. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  R M Natal Jorge,et al.  Establishing the biomechanical properties of the pelvic soft tissues through an inverse finite element analysis using magnetic resonance imaging , 2016, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[6]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  Deformation of the pelvic floor muscles during a vaginal delivery , 2007, International Urogynecology Journal.

[7]  R. Thakar,et al.  Obstetric levator ani muscle injuries: current status , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  Richard L Ehman,et al.  Cross‐validation of magnetic resonance elastography and ultrasound‐based transient elastography: A preliminary phantom study , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  R. Mittal,et al.  Pelvic floor anatomy and applied physiology. , 2008, Gastroenterology clinics of North America.

[10]  Sender Herschorn,et al.  Female pelvic floor anatomy: the pelvic floor, supporting structures, and pelvic organs. , 2004, Reviews in urology.

[11]  Ling-ling Lei,et al.  Biomechanical properties of prolapsed vaginal tissue in pre- and postmenopausal women , 2007, International Urogynecology Journal.

[12]  Brian S. Garra,et al.  Elastography: history, principles, and technique comparison , 2015, Abdominal Imaging.

[13]  J. A. C. Martins,et al.  A numerical model of passive and active behavior of skeletal muscles , 1998 .

[14]  Lingling Huang,et al.  A novel artificial bee colony algorithm with Powell's method , 2013, Appl. Soft Comput..

[15]  T Mascarenhas,et al.  The influence of an occipito-posterior malposition on the biomechanical behavior of the pelvic floor. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[16]  J. McCall,et al.  Genetic algorithms for modelling and optimisation , 2005 .

[17]  Su-Lin Lee,et al.  Subject Specific Finite Element Modelling of the Levator Ani , 2005, MICCAI.

[18]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  A Comparative Study of Several Material Models for Prediction of Hyperelastic Properties: Application to Silicone‐Rubber and Soft Tissues , 2006 .

[19]  P. Dubois,et al.  Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue: preliminary results , 2008, International Urogynecology Journal.

[20]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE ON THE PASSIVE BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLES , 2017 .

[21]  Teresa Mascarenhas,et al.  Moment of inertia as a means to evaluate the biomechanical impact of pelvic organ prolapse , 2013, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[22]  Y. Hsu,et al.  Do repetitive Valsalva maneuvers change maximum prolapse on dynamic MRI? , 2010, International Urogynecology Journal.

[23]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  Biomechanical properties of the pelvic floor muscles of continent and incontinent women using an inverse finite element analysis , 2017, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[24]  Teresa Mascarenhas,et al.  Football practice and urinary incontinence: Relation between morphology, function and biomechanics. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Teresa Mascarenhas,et al.  Computational modeling approach to study the effects of fetal head flexion during vaginal delivery. , 2010, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  Mathias Brieu,et al.  Biomechanical properties of human pelvic organs. , 2012, Urology.

[27]  M. Fink,et al.  Viscoelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties of in vivo muscle tissue assessed by supersonic shear imaging. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[28]  James A Ashton-Miller,et al.  A 3D finite element model of anterior vaginal wall support to evaluate mechanisms underlying cystocele formation. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  R. Ehman,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography: A review , 2010, Clinical anatomy.

[30]  H. Dietz,et al.  Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three‐dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[31]  Brett E Bouma,et al.  A Combined FEM/Genetic Algorithm for Vascular Soft tissue Elasticity Estimation , 2006, Cardiovascular engineering.

[32]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Review of MR elastography applications and recent developments , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[33]  Kari Bø,et al.  Dynamic MRI of the pelvic floor muscles in an upright sitting position , 2001, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[34]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  Restart procedures for the conjugate gradient method , 1977, Math. Program..

[35]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Inverse Finite Element Characterization of Soft Tissues , 2001, MICCAI.

[36]  Hai-Dong Liang,et al.  Medical ultrasound: imaging of soft tissue strain and elasticity , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[37]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Design Process Sequencing With Competent Genetic Algorithms , 2007 .

[38]  Leo K. Cheng,et al.  Subject specific finite elasticity simulations of the pelvic floor. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.