Phylogenetic and ecological factors influencing the number and distribution of electroreceptors in elasmobranchs.

Electroreception is found throughout the animal kingdom from invertebrates to mammals and has been shown to play an important role in prey detection, facilitating social behaviours, the detection of predators and orientation to the earth's magnetic field for navigation. Electroreceptors in elasmobranchs, the ampullae of Lorenzini, detect minute electric fields and independently process these stimuli, thereby providing spatial information to the central nervous system on the location of a source, often potential prey. The ampullae of Lorenzini are individually connected to a single somatic pore on the surface of the skin, with the spatial separation of each pore directly influencing how electrical stimuli are detected and processed. Pore abundance varies across taxonomic groups resulting in unique species-specific differences. The intricate distribution patterns created by the specific positioning of somatic pores on the head are, however, consistent within families, resulting in patterns that are identifiable at higher taxonomic levels. As elasmobranchs evolved, the electrosensory system became more complex and highly specialized, which is evident by a general trend of increasing pore abundance over time. The elasmobranch electrosensory system has evolved to operate efficiently under the environmental conditions of the particular habitat in which a species lives. For example, reduced pore abundance is evident in oceanic pelagic elasmobranchs, for whom visual cues are thought to be of great importance. Pore abundance and spatial distribution may be influenced by multiple factors including head morphology, phylogeny, feeding behaviour and habitat.

[1]  J. Stevens,et al.  Sharks and Rays of Australia , 1991 .

[2]  C. Gilbert A Revision of the Hammerhead Sharks (Family Sphyrnidae) , 1967 .

[3]  W. Heiligenberg,et al.  Development of the electrosensory nervous system in eigenmannia (gymnotiformes): I. The peripheral nervous system , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  D. Nelson,et al.  Prey Capture by the Pacific Angel Shark, Squatina californica: Visually Mediated Strikes and Ambush-Site Characteristics , 1999 .

[5]  Matthew B. Weinger,et al.  An electrical simulator of moving prey for the study of feeding strategies in sharks, skates, and rays , 1981, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  S. Collin,et al.  Sensory Systems in Sawfishes. 2. The Lateral Line , 2011, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[7]  A. Kalmijn,et al.  Bioelectric Fields in Sea Water and the Function of the Ampullae of Lorenzini in Elasmobranch Fishes , 1972 .

[8]  M. Francis,et al.  Sharks and rays of New Zealand , 1997 .

[9]  Thomas J. Lisney,et al.  Relative Eye Size in Elasmobranchs , 2007, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[10]  C. Sepulveda,et al.  The functional role of the caudal fin in the feeding ecology of the common thresher shark Alopias vulpinus. , 2010, Journal of fish biology.

[11]  S. Collin,et al.  Electrosensory pore distribution and feeding in the basking shark Cetorhinus maximus (Lamniformes: Cetorhinidae) , 2011 .

[12]  L. K. Jordan Comparative morphology of stingray lateral line canal and electrosensory systems , 2008, Journal of morphology.

[13]  A. Kalmijn,et al.  Electric and magnetic field detection in elasmobranch fishes. , 1982, Science.

[14]  J. S. Beckett,et al.  Atlantic Ocean Distribution of the Pelagic Stingray, Dasyatis violacea , 1970 .

[15]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  The Detection of Electric Fields from Inanimate and Animate Sources Other Than Electric Organs , 1974 .

[16]  M. Heupel,et al.  Assessing habitat use and movement , 2004 .

[17]  A. Kalmijn,et al.  The electric sense of sharks and rays. , 1971, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  S. Collin,et al.  Description of the mechanoreceptive lateral line and electroreceptive ampullary systems in the freshwater whipray, Himantura dalyensis , 2011 .

[19]  Shaun P. Collin,et al.  The functional roles of passive electroreception in non-electric fishes , 2004 .

[20]  T. Tricas,et al.  Electrosensitive Spatial Vectors in Elasmobranch Fishes: Implications for Source Localization , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  Michael G. Paulin ELECTRORECEPTION AND THE COMPASS SENSE OF SHARKS , 1995 .

[22]  S. Hedges,et al.  Cartilaginous fi shes (Chondrichthyes) , 2009 .

[23]  S. Collin,et al.  Electrosensory pore distribution and feeding in the megamouth shark Megachasma pelagios (Lamniformes: Megachasmidae) , 2011 .

[24]  David Bodznick,et al.  Segregation of electroreceptive and mechanoreceptive lateral line afferents in the hindbrain of chondrostean fishes , 1985, Brain Research.

[25]  B. McNab Energetics, body size, and the limits to endothermy , 2009 .

[26]  M. Bottaro,et al.  Ampullary pore distribution of Galeus melastomus and Etmopterus spinax: possible relations with predatory lifestyle and habitat , 2006, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[27]  Timothy C. Tricas The neuroecology of the elasmobranch electrosensory world: why peripheral morphology shapes behavior , 2001 .

[28]  M. Yoklavich,et al.  Trophic ecology of the dominant fishes in Elkhorn Slough, California, 1974–1980 , 1996 .

[29]  J. S. Nelson,et al.  Fishes of the world. , 1978 .

[30]  K. Yopak,et al.  Sensory adaptations to the environment: Electroreceptors as a case study , 2010 .

[31]  Timothy C. Tricas Bioelectric-Mediated Predation by Swell Sharks, Cephaloscyllium ventriosum , 1982 .

[32]  M. Walker,et al.  Orientation and Navigation in Elasmobranchs: Which Way Forward? , 2001, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[33]  L. Compagno,et al.  Sharks of the world :an annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date , 1984 .

[34]  I. Tibbetts,et al.  Comparison of the lateral line and ampullary systems of two species of shovelnose ray , 2008, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[35]  W. Raschi A morphological analysis of the ampullae of Lorenzini in selected skates (Pisces, Rajoidei) , 1986, Journal of morphology.

[36]  T. Mulligan,et al.  Food habits, occurrence, and population structure of the bat ray, Myliobatis californica, in Humboldt Bay, California , 1997, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[37]  S. Peverell Distribution of sawfishes (Pristidae) in the Queensland Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia, with notes on sawfish ecology , 2005, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[38]  S. Collin,et al.  Morphology and distribution of the ampullary electroreceptors in wobbegong sharks: implications for feeding behaviour , 2011 .

[39]  M. Gordon,et al.  Functional consequences of structural differences in stingray sensory systems. Part II: electrosensory system , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[40]  J. M. Jørgensen Morphology of Electroreceptive Sensory Organs , 2005 .

[41]  S. Kajiura Head Morphology and Electrosensory Pore Distribution of Carcharhinid and Sphyrnid Sharks , 2001, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[42]  L. Compagno,et al.  Guide to the Sharks and Rays of Southern Africa , 1989 .

[43]  R. Steel Sharks of the World , 1985 .

[44]  H. Norris,et al.  The distribution and innervation of the ampullae of lorenzini of the dogfish, squalus acanthias. Some comparisons with conditions in other plagiostomes and corrections of prevalent errors , 1929 .

[45]  S. Collin,et al.  Sensory Systems in Sawfishes. 1. The Ampullae of Lorenzini , 2011, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[46]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Brain Organization and Specialization in Deep-Sea Chondrichthyans , 2008, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.