Evolution of Nucleosome Occupancy: Conservation of Global Properties and Divergence of Gene-Specific Patterns

ABSTRACT To examine the role of nucleosome occupancy in the evolution of gene expression, we measured the genome-wide nucleosome profiles of four yeast species, three belonging to the Saccharomyces sensu stricto lineage and the more distantly related Candida glabrata. Nucleosomes and associated promoter elements at C. glabrata genes are typically shifted upstream by ∼20 bp, compared to their orthologs from sensu stricto species. Nonetheless, all species display the same global organization features first described for Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a stereotypical nucleosome organization along genes and a division of promoters into those that contain or lack a pronounced nucleosome-depleted region (NDR), with the latter displaying a more dynamic pattern of gene expression. Despite this global similarity, however, nucleosome occupancy at specific genes diverged extensively between sensu stricto and C. glabrata orthologs (∼50 million years). Orthologs with dynamic expression patterns tend to maintain their lack of NDR, but apart from that, sensu stricto and C. glabrata orthologs are nearly as similar in nucleosome occupancy patterns as nonorthologous genes. This extensive divergence in nucleosome occupancy contrasts with a conserved pattern of gene expression. Thus, while some evolutionary changes in nucleosome occupancy contribute to gene expression divergence, nucleosome occupancy often diverges extensively with apparently little impact on gene expression.

[1]  Nir Friedman,et al.  High-resolution nucleosome mapping reveals transcription-dependent promoter packaging. , 2010, Genome research.

[2]  M. Palumbo,et al.  Extensive role of the general regulatory factors, Abf1 and Rap1, in determining genome-wide chromatin structure in budding yeast , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  Yaniv Lubling,et al.  Distinct Modes of Regulation by Chromatin Encoded through Nucleosome Positioning Signals , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  L. Fulton,et al.  Finding Functional Features in Saccharomyces Genomes by Phylogenetic Footprinting , 2003, Science.

[5]  Timothy R. Hughes,et al.  G+C content dominates intrinsic nucleosome occupancy , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Divergence of transcription factor binding sites across related yeast species. , 2007, Science.

[7]  Naama Barkai,et al.  Comparative biology: beyond sequence analysis. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[8]  N. Patel,et al.  Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change. , 1998, Development.

[9]  K. Kuchler,et al.  Candida glabrata environmental stress response involves Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msn2/4 orthologous transcription factors , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[10]  W. Heideman,et al.  Stb3 Binds to Ribosomal RNA Processing Element Motifs That Control Transcriptional Responses to Growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  L. Stryer,et al.  Statistical distributions of nucleosomes: nonrandom locations by a stochastic mechanism. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  Zhenhai Zhang,et al.  A Packing Mechanism for Nucleosome Organization Reconstituted Across a Eukaryotic Genome , 2011, Science.

[13]  B. Cairns.  The logic of chromatin architecture and remodelling at promoters , 2009, Nature.

[14]  N. Satoh,et al.  Evolutionary alterations of the minimal promoter for notochord-specific Brachyury expression in ascidian embryos. , 1999, Development.

[15]  Jan-Fang Cheng,et al.  Detection of weakly conserved ancestral mammalian regulatory sequences by primate comparisons , 2006, Genome Biology.

[16]  Cizhong Jiang,et al.  Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[17]  K. Verstrepen,et al.  Promoter architecture and the evolvability of gene expression , 2009, Journal of biology.

[18]  Christopher L. Warren,et al.  A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[19]  Sven Bergmann,et al.  Rewiring of the Yeast Transcriptional Network Through the Evolution of Motif Usage , 2005, Science.

[20]  Bing Li,et al.  The Role of Chromatin during Transcription , 2007, Cell.

[21]  B. Pugh,et al.  Identification and Distinct Regulation of Yeast TATA Box-Containing Genes , 2004, Cell.

[22]  Aviv Regev,et al.  The Role of Nucleosome Positioning in the Evolution of Gene Regulation , 2010, PLoS biology.

[23]  H. Munro,et al.  Mammalian protein metabolism , 1964 .

[24]  Bryan J Venters,et al.  A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. , 2008, Genome research.

[25]  G. Babbitt,et al.  Inferring natural selection on fine-scale chromatin organization in yeast. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  H. Madhani,et al.  Mechanisms that Specify Promoter Nucleosome Location and Identity , 2009, Cell.

[27]  Naama Barkai,et al.  Divergence of nucleosome positioning between two closely related yeast species: genetic basis and functional consequences , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[28]  N. Friedman,et al.  Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi , 2007, Nature.

[29]  Esther T. Chan,et al.  Conservation of core gene expression in vertebrate tissues , 2009, Journal of biology.

[30]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome , 2009, Nature.

[31]  N. Barkai,et al.  Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. , 2008, Genome research.

[32]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[33]  D. Gifford,et al.  Tissue-specific transcriptional regulation has diverged significantly between human and mouse , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[34]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Genome-Scale Identification of Nucleosome Positions in S. cerevisiae , 2005, Science.

[35]  T. Jukes.  CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1969 .

[36]  Noam Kaplan,et al.  Gene expression divergence in yeast is coupled to evolution of DNA-encoded nucleosome organization , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[37]  Gary Ruvkun,et al.  Functional tests of enhancer conservation between distantly related species , 2003, Development.

[38]  Oliver J. Rando,et al.  Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription , 2007, Nature.

[39]  Stephan C. Schuster,et al.  Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome , 2008, Nature.

[40]  B. Dujon,et al.  Genome evolution in yeasts , 2004, Nature.

[41]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[42]  Naama Barkai,et al.  On the relation between promoter divergence and gene expression evolution , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[43]  Yaniv Ziv,et al.  Revealing modular organization in the yeast transcriptional network , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[44]  Gregory A. Wray,et al.  Conservation of Endo16 expression in sea urchins despite evolutionary divergence in both cis and trans-acting components of transcriptional regulation , 2003, Development.

[45]  S. Fisher,et al.  Conservation of RET Regulatory Function from Human to Zebrafish Without Sequence Similarity , 2006, Science.

[46]  Judith Berman,et al.  The pattern and evolution of yeast promoter bendability. , 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG.