Noxious somatosensory stimulation affects the default mode of brain function: evidence from functional MR imaging.

PURPOSE To investigate whether default mode network (DMN) spatial properties can be directly affected by pain, with a comparison of painful and nonpainful conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors performed a functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging study, approved by the local institutional ethics committee, involving 10 healthy male subjects (age range, 18-45 years) who gave written informed consent. The subjects underwent two experimental sessions of median nerve electrical stimulation at painful and nonpainful levels. Independent component analysis of the functional MR imaging data was performed to determine the DMN spatiotemporal pattern. Group-level DMN connectivity maps for painful and nonpainful conditions were obtained (P < .001, corrected with false discovery rate). The contrast between the connectivity maps in the two conditions was also computed (P < .05, corrected with false discovery rate). RESULTS The DMN maintained its typical temporal properties but was subject to modifications in connectivity pattern during painful stimulation, affecting the brain areas associated with pain processing. Increased connectivity in painful conditions was found mainly in the left prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex-precuneus, and decreased connectivity was found in the lateral parietal cortex. CONCLUSION Study findings were in line with the impairments of the DMN reported in patients with chronic pain. They support the hypothesis that alteration of the DMN connectivity pattern localized in specific brain areas during acute pain, if repeated across time, might induce permanent changes that could disrupt the DMN functional architecture.

[1]  R. Peyron,et al.  Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000) , 2000, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Benjamin J. Shannon,et al.  Coherent spontaneous activity identifies a hippocampal-parietal memory network. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Claudio Babiloni,et al.  Functional topography of the secondary somatosensory cortex for nonpainful and painful stimulation of median and tibial nerve: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Independent component analysis of fMRI group studies by self-organizing clustering , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  S. Derbyshire,et al.  Exploring the pain “neuromatrix” , 2000, Current review of pain.

[8]  D. Chialvo,et al.  Beyond Feeling: Chronic Pain Hurts the Brain, Disrupting the Default-Mode Network Dynamics , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  C. Babiloni,et al.  Somatotopy of anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and supplementary motor area (SMA) for electric stimulation of the median and tibial nerves: An fMRI study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[10]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Classification of fMRI independent components using IC-fingerprints and support vector machine classifiers , 2007, NeuroImage.

[11]  J. Binder,et al.  A Parametric Manipulation of Factors Affecting Task-induced Deactivation in Functional Neuroimaging , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Transient Suppression of Ipsilateral Primary Somatosensory Cortex during Tactile Finger Stimulation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  R. Buckner,et al.  Self-projection and the brain , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Independent component model of the default-mode brain function: Assessing the impact of active thinking , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[15]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Large-scale brain networks account for sustained and transient activity during target detection , 2009, NeuroImage.

[16]  Kyungmo Park,et al.  Acupuncture modulates resting state connectivity in default and sensorimotor brain networks , 2008, PAIN.

[17]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[19]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Modulation of temporally coherent brain networks estimated using ICA at rest and during cognitive tasks , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[21]  M. Raichle,et al.  Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  fMRI resting state networks define distinct modes of long-distance interactions in the human brain , 2006, NeuroImage.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[25]  B. Harrison,et al.  Consistency and functional specialization in the default mode brain network , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  M. Greicius,et al.  Default-Mode Activity during a Passive Sensory Task: Uncoupled from Deactivation but Impacting Activation , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Chialvo,et al.  Chronic Pain and the Emotional Brain: Specific Brain Activity Associated with Spontaneous Fluctuations of Intensity of Chronic Back Pain , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Claudio Babiloni,et al.  Nociceptive and non-nociceptive sub-regions in the human secondary somatosensory cortex: An MEG study using fMRI constraints , 2005, NeuroImage.

[29]  A. Shmuel,et al.  Sustained Negative BOLD, Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption Response and Its Coupling to the Positive Response in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[30]  C. A. Porro,et al.  Touch or pain? Spatio-temporal patterns of cortical fMRI activity following brief mechanical stimuli , 2008, PAIN.

[31]  T. J. Breen,et al.  Biostatistical Analysis (2nd ed.). , 1986 .

[32]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[33]  J. Maisog,et al.  Pain intensity processing within the human brain: a bilateral, distributed mechanism. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Claudio Babiloni,et al.  Functional topography of the secondary somatosensory cortex for nonpainful and painful stimuli: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[35]  Claudio Babiloni,et al.  Comparison between SI and SII responses as a function of stimulus intensity , 2002, Neuroreport.

[36]  P Baraldi,et al.  Temporal and intensity coding of pain in human cortex. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[38]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Till Sprenger,et al.  Distraction modulates connectivity of the cingulo-frontal cortex and the midbrain during pain—an fMRI analysis , 2004, Pain.

[40]  M. Raichle,et al.  Blood flow changes in human somatosensory cortex during anticipated stimulation , 1995, Nature.