Application of Different Exposure Measures in Development of Planning-Level Zonal Crash Prediction Models

Assessment of the safety impacts of travel demand management (TDM) policies must be conducted proactively. Because TDM policies are typically implemented at an aggregate level, crash prediction models should also be developed at a similar level. The resolution of these models should better match that at which evaluations of TDM policies are performed. Therefore, in this study zonal crash prediction models were considered to establish an association between observed crashes and a set of predictor variables in each zone. This analysis was performed with the generalized linear modeling procedure and the assumption of a negative binomial error distribution. Different exposure, network, and sociodemographic variables for 2,200 traffic analysis zones were considered predictors of crashes in the study area of Flanders, Belgium. An activity-based transportation model framework was applied to produce exposure measurements for crash data that consisted of injury crashes recorded between 2004 and 2007. Network and sociodemographic characteristics were also collected. Different zonal crash prediction models were developed to predict the number of injury crashes, including crashes involving fatalities and severe and slight injuries. These models were classified into three groups: (a) flow-based models, (b) trip-based models, and (c) a combination of the two. The results showed considerable improvement of model performance when both trip-based and flow-based exposure variables were used simultaneously in the formulation of the model. The main purpose of this study was to develop a predictive tool that could be used at the planning level to evaluate the impacts of different TDM policies on traffic safety.

[1]  Jutaek Oh,et al.  Forecasting Crashes at the Planning Level: Simultaneous Negative Binomial Crash Model Applied in Tucson, Arizona , 2004 .

[2]  M. Quddus,et al.  A spatially disaggregate analysis of road casualties in England. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Xuesong Wang,et al.  Integrating Trip and Roadway Characteristics to Manage Safety in Traffic Analysis Zones , 2011 .

[4]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Zonal-Level Safety Evaluation Incorporating Trip Generation Effects , 2011 .

[5]  Ali Naderan,et al.  Aggregate crash prediction models: introducing crash generation concept. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  A. Shalaby,et al.  Development of planning level transportation safety tools using Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  J L Martin,et al.  Comparison of road crashes incidence and severity between some French counties. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Robert B Noland,et al.  The effect of infrastructure and demographic change on traffic-related fatalities and crashes: a case study of Illinois county-level data. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives , 2010 .

[10]  Todd Alexander Litman,et al.  Macrolevel Collision Prediction Models to Evaluate Road Safety Effects of Mobility Management Strategies: New Empirical Tools to Promote Sustainable Development , 2008 .

[11]  Gordon Richard Lovegrove,et al.  Community-based, macro-level collision prediction models , 2006 .

[12]  Davy Janssens,et al.  Modelling Short-Term Dynamics in Activity-Travel Patterns: Conceptual Framework of the Feathers Model , 2007 .

[13]  Meiwu An,et al.  Using Travel Demand Model and Zonal Safety Planning Model for Safety Benefit Estimation in Project Evaluation , 2011 .

[14]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Macrolevel Collision Prediction Models to Enhance Traditional Reactive Road Safety Improvement Programs , 2007 .

[15]  Rajiv Bhatia,et al.  An area-level model of vehicle-pedestrian injury collisions with implications for land use and transportation planning. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Davy Janssens,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Fuel Cost on Traffic Demand in Flanders using Activity-Based Models , 2008 .

[17]  N. Levine,et al.  Spatial analysis of Honolulu motor vehicle crashes: II. Zonal generators. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Alireza Hadayeghi,et al.  Use of Advanced Techniques to Estimate Zonal Level Safety Planning Models and Examine their Temporal Transferability , 2009 .

[19]  M. Quddus Modelling area-wide count outcomes with spatial correlation and heterogeneity: an analysis of London crash data. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Helai Huang,et al.  County-Level Crash Risk Analysis in Florida: Bayesian Spatial Modeling , 2010 .

[21]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Macro-level collision prediction models for evaluating neighbourhood traffic safety , 2006 .

[22]  P. Jovanis,et al.  Spatial analysis of fatal and injury crashes in Pennsylvania. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Andrew P Tarko,et al.  Tool with Road-Level Crash Prediction for Transportation Safety Planning , 2008 .

[24]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  Development of Planning-Level Transportation Safety Models using Full Bayesian Semiparametric Additive Techniques , 2010 .

[25]  A. Shalaby,et al.  Macrolevel Accident Prediction Models for Evaluating Safety of Urban Transportation Systems , 2003 .

[26]  Alireza Hadayeghi,et al.  Temporal transferability and updating of zonal level accident prediction models. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  M G Karlaftis,et al.  Heterogeneity considerations in accident modeling. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.