Heliconius wing patterns: an evo-devo model for understanding phenotypic diversity

Evolutionary Developmental Biology aims for a mechanistic understanding of phenotypic diversity, and present knowledge is largely based on gene expression and interaction patterns from a small number of well-known model organisms. However, our understanding of biological diversification depends on our ability to pinpoint the causes of natural variation at a micro-evolutionary level, and therefore requires the isolation of genetic and developmental variation in a controlled genetic background. The colour patterns of Heliconius butterflies (Nymphalidae: Heliconiinae) provide a rich suite of naturally occurring variants with striking phenotypic diversity and multiple taxonomic levels of variation. Diversification in the genus is well known for its dramatic colour-pattern divergence between races or closely related species, and for Müllerian mimicry convergence between distantly related species, providing a unique system to study the development basis of colour-pattern evolution. A long history of genetic studies has showed that pattern variation is based on allelic combinations at a surprisingly small number of loci, and recent developmental evidence suggests that pattern development in Heliconius is different from the eyespot determination of other butterflies. Fine-scale genetic mapping studies have shown that a shared toolkit of genes is used to produce both convergent and divergent phenotypes. These exciting results and the development of new genomic resources make Heliconius a very promising evo-devo model for the study of adaptive change.

[1]  K. S. Brown,et al.  Genetics and the Evolution of Muellerian Mimicry in Heliconius Butterflies , 1985 .

[2]  J. Mallet,et al.  Variable Selection and the Coexistence of Multiple mimetic forms of the Butterfly Heliconius numata , 1999, Evolutionary Ecology.

[3]  L. Gilbert,et al.  Wing venation and Distal-less expression in Heliconius butterfly wing pattern development , 2004, Development Genes and Evolution.

[4]  H. Bates,et al.  XXXII. Contributions to an Insect Fauna of the Amazon Valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidæ. , 1862 .

[5]  James Mallet,et al.  Causes and Consequences of a Lack of Coevolution in Müllerian mimicry , 1999, Evolutionary Ecology.

[6]  S. Carroll,et al.  Chance caught on the wing: cis-regulatory evolution and the origin of pigment patterns in Drosophila , 2005, Nature.

[7]  John Doebley,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS DEFINING SPECIES DIFFERENCES IN WILD RELATIVES OF MAIZE ARE CONTROLLED BY MULTIPLE QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  Durrell D. Kapan,et al.  Historical demography of Mullerian mimicry in the neotropical Heliconius butterflies. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  W. McMillan,et al.  Characterization of microsatellite loci in neotropical Heliconius butterflies , 2002 .

[10]  C. Jiggins,et al.  The genetic basis of an adaptive radiation: warning colour in two Heliconius species , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  SPECIALIZED AVIAN PREDATORS REPEATEDLY ATTACK NOVEL COLOR MORPHS OF HELICONIUS BUTTERFLIES , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  U. Mueller,et al.  AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  N. Barton,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: A CRITIQUE OF SEWALL WRIGHT'S SHIFTING BALANCE THEORY OF EVOLUTION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  J. Mallet,et al.  Phylogenetic discordance at the species boundary: comparative gene genealogies among rapidly radiating Heliconius butterflies. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[15]  W. W. Benson,et al.  Adaptive Polymorphism Associated with Multiple Mullerian Mimicry in Heliconius numata (Lepid. Nymph.) , 1974 .

[16]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Mutants highlight the modular control of butterfly eyespot patterns , 2003, Evolution & development.

[17]  L. Gilbert,et al.  Insect metabolism: Preventing cyanide release from leaves , 2000, Nature.

[18]  H. Bates,et al.  Contributions to an Insect Fauna of the Amazon Valley.—Lepidoptera:—Heliconinæ. , 1862 .

[19]  Sean B. Carroll,et al.  "Development, Plasticity and Evolution of Butterfly Eyespot Patterns" (1996), by Paul M. Brakefield et al. , 2013 .

[20]  A. Wilkins The Evolution of Developmental Pathways , 2001 .

[21]  J. Marcus,et al.  Germline transformation of the butterfly Bicyclus anynana , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  H. Nijhout,et al.  The development and evolution of butterfly wing patterns , 1991 .

[23]  J. Marcus Jumping genes and AFLP maps: transforming lepidopteran color pattern genetics , 2005, Evolution & development.

[24]  M. Blum RAPID MOVEMENT OF A HELICONIUS HYBRID ZONE: EVIDENCE FOR PHASE III OF WRIGHT'S SHIFTING BALANCE THEORY? , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Developmental biology: Hotspots for evolution , 2003, Nature.

[26]  J. Johnston,et al.  A Genetic Linkage Map of the Mimetic Butterfly Heliconius melpomene , 2005, Genetics.

[27]  L. Gilbert Pollen feeding and reproductive biology of heliconius butterflies. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  P. Brakefield,et al.  The genetics and evo–devo of butterfly wing patterns , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[29]  S. Carroll,et al.  Repeated morphological evolution through cis-regulatory changes in a pleiotropic gene , 2006, Nature.

[30]  K. Shaw,et al.  Mapping unexplored genomes: a genetic linkage map of the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. , 2002, Genetics.

[31]  RAPID MOVEMENT OF A HELICONIUS HYBRID ZONE: EVIDENCE FOR PHASE III OF WRIGHT's SHIFTING BALANCE THEORY? , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  N. Barton,et al.  STRONG NATURAL SELECTION IN A WARNING‐COLOR HYBRID ZONE , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Contribution of Distal-less to quantitative variation in butterfly eyespots , 2002, Nature.

[34]  J. Mallet,et al.  What initiates speciation in passion-vine butterflies? , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  M. Beltrán,et al.  The speciation history of Heliconius : inferences from multilocus DNA sequence data , 2005 .

[36]  Chris D Jiggins,et al.  Genomic tools and cDNA derived markers for butterflies , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[37]  L. Nagy,et al.  Evolutionary redeployment of a biosynthetic module: expression of eye pigment genes vermilion, cinnabar, and white in butterfly wing development , 2005, Evolution & development.

[38]  Jeremy Schmutz,et al.  Widespread Parallel Evolution in Sticklebacks by Repeated Fixation of Ectodysplasin Alleles , 2005, Science.

[39]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Generating phenotypic variation: prospects from “evo‐devo” research on Bicyclus anynana wing patterns , 2005, Evolution & development.

[40]  K. S. Brown THE BIOLOGY OF HELICONIUS AND RELATED GENERA , 1981 .

[41]  N. Gostling,et al.  From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design , 2002, Heredity.

[42]  M. Serfas,et al.  Butterfly Wing Pattern Evolution Is Associated with Changes in a Notch/Distal-less Temporal Pattern Formation Process , 2004, Current Biology.

[43]  J. Mallet The genetics of warning colour in Peruvian hybrid zones of Heliconius erato and H. melpomene , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[44]  T. Hart,et al.  Conserved Genetic Basis of a Quantitative Plumage Trait Involved in Mate Choice , 2004, Science.

[45]  M. Kronforst Primers for the amplification of nuclear introns in Heliconius butterflies , 2005 .

[46]  E. Davidson Genomic Regulatory Systems: Development and Evolution , 2005 .

[47]  Durrell D. Kapan,et al.  Three-butterfly system provides a field test of müllerian mimicry , 2001, Nature.

[48]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Theoretical genetics of Batesian mimicry II. Evolution of supergenes. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[49]  D. Stern A role of Ultrabithorax in morphological differences between Drosophila species , 1998, Nature.

[50]  J. Mallet,et al.  Mimicry: developmental genes that contribute to speciation , 2003, Evolution & development.

[51]  J. Mallet,et al.  Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  Catherine A. Wilson,et al.  Parallel genetic basis for repeated evolution of armor loss in Alaskan threespine stickleback populations. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  S. Thibault,et al.  Germ‐line transformation of pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) mediated by the piggyBac transposable element , 2000, Insect molecular biology.

[54]  John R. G. Turner,et al.  The Evolution of Mimicry: A Solution to the Problem of Punctuated Equilibrium , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[55]  J. Doebley The genetics of maize evolution. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[56]  R. ffrench-Constant,et al.  RNAi suppression of recognition protein mediated immune responses in the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta causes increased susceptibility to the insect pathogen Photorhabdus. , 2006, Developmental and comparative immunology.

[57]  S. Carroll,et al.  The generation and diversification of butterfly eyespot color patterns , 2001, Current Biology.

[58]  J. Mavárez,et al.  A set of microsatellite markers for Heliconius melpomene and closely related species , 2006 .

[59]  W. W. Benson Natural Selection for Miillerian Mimicry in Heliconius erato in Costa Rica , 1972, Science.

[60]  D. Schemske,et al.  Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus). , 1998, Genetics.

[61]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution , 2002, Nature.

[62]  Durrell D. Kapan,et al.  Localization of Müllerian Mimicry Genes on a Dense Linkage Map of Heliconius erato , 2006, Genetics.

[63]  N. Barton,et al.  Inference from clines stabilized by frequency-dependent selection. , 1989, Genetics.

[64]  Durrell D. Kapan,et al.  First-generation linkage map of the warningly colored butterfly Heliconius erato , 2005, Heredity.

[65]  Turner J.R.G. Butterfly mimicry: the genetical evolution of an adaptation. , 1977 .

[66]  James Mallet,et al.  Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry , 2001, Nature.

[67]  Durrell D. Kapan,et al.  Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  James Mallet,et al.  A Conserved Supergene Locus Controls Colour Pattern Diversity in Heliconius Butterflies , 2006, PLoS biology.

[69]  S. Carroll,et al.  Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. , 1994, Science.

[70]  Durrell D. Kapan,et al.  Development and evolution on the wing , 2002 .