Effect of providing information about normal test results on patients' reassurance: randomised controlled trial

Objective To investigate whether providing information about normal findings before a diagnostic test improves patients' reassurance and reduces anxiety about symptoms. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Outpatient cardiology clinic. Participants 92 patients with chest pain referred for a diagnostic exercise stress test. Intervention Before undergoing testing patients were randomised to receive standard information (n=28; control group), a pamphlet explaining the function of the test and the meaning of normal test results (n=30; pamphlet group), or the pamphlet and a brief discussion about the meaning of normal test results (n=34; discussion group). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was patients' reported reassurance on a 5 item scale immediately after the test and at one month. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients still with chest pain and still taking cardiac drugs at one month. Results The mean levels of reassurance after testing and feedback from the doctor were significantly higher in the discussion group (42.0, 95% confidence interval 39.7 to 44.2) than in the pamphlet (39.2, 36.1 to 42.3) and control groups (35.8, 31.6 to 39.9). This difference was maintained at one month. The proportion of patients still reporting chest pain at one month decreased significantly in the discussion group (to 17%) and pamphlet group (to 28%) but not in the control group (to 36%). A trend was for fewer patients in the discussion group to be taking cardiac drugs at one month. Conclusion Providing patients with information about normal test results before testing can improve rates of reassurance and reduce the likelihood of future reports of chest pain. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN87589121.

[1]  S. Wessely,et al.  Reappraising reassurance--the role of investigations. , 1996, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[2]  L. Hirsch Competing interests: none declared. , 2006 .

[3]  K. Petrie,et al.  Who is not reassured following benign diagnosis of breast symptoms? , 2005, Psycho-oncology.

[4]  K. Hossack,et al.  Enhanced risk assessment for primary coronary heart disease events by maximal exercise testing: 10 years' experience of Seattle Heart Watch. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  E. Broadbent,et al.  Illness perceptions predict reassurance following a negative exercise stress testing result , 2006 .

[6]  A. Hopkins,et al.  Referrals to neurologists for headaches not due to structural disease. , 1981, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  I G McDonald,et al.  Opening Pandora's box: the unpredictability of reassurance by a normal test result , 1996, BMJ.

[8]  C. Bass,et al.  Non-cardiac chest pain: why was a brief intervention apparently ineffective? , 1997, Psychological Medicine.

[9]  J. Chambers,et al.  Chest pain in people with normal coronary anatomy , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  J. Rees,et al.  Failure of a negative exercise test to reassure patients with chest pain. , 1987, The Quarterly journal of medicine.

[11]  S. Morley,et al.  Responses of consecutive patients to reassurance after gastroscopy: results of self administered questionnaire survey , 1997, BMJ.

[12]  C. Bass,et al.  Psychological morbidity in patients with chest pain and normal or near-normal coronary arteries: a long-term follow-up study , 1995, Psychological Medicine.