Allometric scaling of brain regions to intra‐cranial volume: An epidemiological MRI study

There is growing evidence that sub‐structures of the brain scale allometrically to total brain size, that is, in a non‐proportional and non‐linear way. Here, scaling of different volumes of interest (VOI) to intra‐cranial volume (ICV) was examined. It was assessed whether scaling was allometric or isometric and whether scaling coefficients significantly differed from each other. We also tested to what extent allometric scaling of VOI was introduced by the automated segmentation technique. Furthermore, reproducibility of allometric scaling was studied different age groups and study populations. Study samples included samples of cognitively healthy adults from the community‐based Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility‐Reykjavik Study (AGES‐Reykjavik Study) (N = 3,883), the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (CARDIA) (N =709), and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (N = 180). Data encompassed participants with different age, ethnicity, risk factor profile, and ICV and VOI obtained with different automated MRI segmentation techniques. Our analysis showed that (1) allometric scaling is a trait of all parts of the brain, (2) scaling of neo‐cortical white matter, neo‐cortical gray matter, and deep gray matter structures including the cerebellum are significantly different from each other, and (3) allometric scaling of brain structures cannot solely be explained by age‐associated atrophy, sex, ethnicity, or a systematic bias from study‐specific segmentation algorithm, but appears to be a true feature of brain geometry. Hum Brain Mapp 38:151–164, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Automatic "pipeline" analysis of 3-D MRI data for clinical trials: application to multiple sclerosis , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[3]  R. J. Smith Rethinking allometry. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  Jean A. Frazier,et al.  Statistical adjustments for brain size in volumetric neuroimaging studies: Some practical implications in methods , 2011, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[5]  V. Gudnason,et al.  Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study: multidisciplinary applied phenomics. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Hierarchical active shape models, using the wavelet transform , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[8]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Computer-assisted Segmentation of White Matter Lesions in 3d Mr Images Using Support Vector Machine 1 , 2022 .

[9]  R. Woods,et al.  Gender effects on cortical thickness and the influence of scaling , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  Larger is twistier: Spectral analysis of gyrification (SPANGY) applied to adult brain size polymorphism , 2012, NeuroImage.

[11]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Genetic and environmental influences on structural variability of the brain in pediatric twin: Deformation based morphometry , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  Hanna Damasio,et al.  Effects of spatial transformation on regional brain volume estimates , 2008, NeuroImage.

[13]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Brain size and grey matter volume in the healthy human brain , 2002, Neuroreport.

[14]  B M Dawant,et al.  Automatic detection of intracranial contours in MR images. , 1994, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[15]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Measuring Brain Lesion Progression with a Supervised Tissue Classification System , 2008, MICCAI.

[16]  T. Deacon Fallacies of progression in theories of brain-size evolution , 1990, International Journal of Primatology.

[17]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Genetic patterns of correlation among subcortical volumes in humans: Results from a magnetic resonance imaging twin study , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[18]  M. Hofman Size and shape of the cerebral cortex in mammals. II. The cortical volume. , 1988, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[19]  A. Toga,et al.  In vivo evidence for post-adolescent brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  S. Resnick,et al.  An image-processing system for qualitative and quantitative volumetric analysis of brain images. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[21]  Jesper Fredriksson,et al.  Brain tissue volumes in the general population of the elderly The AGES-Reykjavik Study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[22]  Andrew Simmons,et al.  The effects of intracranial volume adjustment approaches on multiple regional MRI volumes in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease , 2014, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[23]  V. Mountcastle The columnar organization of the neocortex. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  Jane S. Paulsen,et al.  The power-proportion method for intracranial volume correction in volumetric imaging analysis , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[25]  S B Hulley,et al.  CARDIA: study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  Patrice Y. Simard,et al.  Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  S. Resnick,et al.  Measuring Size and Shape of the Hippocampus in MR Images Using a Deformable Shape Model , 2002, NeuroImage.

[28]  M. Hofman Size and shape of the cerebral cortex in mammals. I. The cortical surface. , 1985, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[29]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Brain size and cortical structure in the adult human brain. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.