AN EFFECTIVE SETTING OF HIERARCHICAL CELL STRUCTURE FOR THE FAST MULTIPOLE BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD

The fast multipole boundary element method (FMBEM) is an advanced BEM that leads to drastic reduction of processing time and memory requirements in a large-scale steady-state sound field analysis. In the FMBEM, hierarchical cell structure is employed to apply multipole expansion in multiple levels, and the setting of the hierarchical cell structure considerably affects the computational efficiency of the FMBEM. This paper deals with effective settings of hierarchical cell structure for taking full advantage of the FMBEM. A numerical study with objects of different shapes with the same DOF shows that both the computational complexity and the memory requirements with the FMBEM were greater for 1D-shaped objects than for 2D- or 3D-shaped ones, without a special setting of hierarchical cell structure for each problem. An effective setting for 1D-shaped objects is derived through theoretical and numerical studies, where special considerations are given to the arrangement of the cell structure and the treatment of translation coefficients between cells. This setting allows for efficient calculations not dependent on the shape of an analyzed object. A simple method to arrange hierarchical cell structure is proposed, which realizes the derived setting for arbitrarily-shaped problems.

[1]  André Buchau,et al.  BEM computations using the fast multipole method in combination with higher order elements and the Galerkin method , 2001 .

[2]  S. Amini,et al.  Multi-level fast multipole solution of the scattering problem , 2003 .

[3]  V. Rokhlin Rapid solution of integral equations of classical potential theory , 1985 .

[4]  Weng Cho Chew,et al.  Calculation of acoustical scattering from a cluster of scatterers , 1998 .

[5]  Naoshi Nishimura,et al.  A fast multipole boundary integral equation method for crack problems in 3D , 1999 .

[6]  Stefan Schneider Application of Fast Methods for Acoustic Scattering and Radiation Problems , 2003 .

[7]  S. Rao Kosaraju,et al.  A decomposition of multidimensional point sets with applications to k-nearest-neighbors and n-body potential fields , 1995, JACM.

[8]  R. V. D. Geijn,et al.  A fast solution method for three‐dimensional many‐particle problems of linear elasticity , 1998 .

[9]  Srinivas Aluru Greengard's N-Body Algorithm is not Order N , 1996, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[10]  V. Rokhlin Rapid Solution of Integral Equations of Scattering Theory , 1990 .

[11]  Horst Schwichtenberg,et al.  Acceleration of molecular mechanic simulation by parallelization and fast multipole techniques , 1999, Parallel Comput..

[12]  Srinivas Aluru,et al.  Distribution-Independent Hierarchical Algorithms for the N-body Problem , 1998, The Journal of Supercomputing.

[13]  S. Marburg,et al.  Performance of iterative solvers for acoustic problems. Part I. Solvers and effect of diagonal preconditioning , 2003 .

[14]  R. Coifman,et al.  The fast multipole method for the wave equation: a pedestrian prescription , 1993, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[15]  Michael A. Epton,et al.  Multipole Translation Theory for the Three-Dimensional Laplace and Helmholtz Equations , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[16]  V. Rokhlin Diagonal Forms of Translation Operators for the Helmholtz Equation in Three Dimensions , 1993 .