Linguistic politeness and face-work in computer mediated communication, Part 2: An application of the theoretical framework

Analysis of sociointerpersonal communication patterns among discourse participants is essential to understand the manifestation of and the interpersonalcommunication features realized in online social interaction. The linguistic politeness theory provides an effective framework for such an analysis of sociointerpersonal communication features employed by online language users tomaintain and enhance their public selfimage, or face. The qualitative data analysis of this study, drawn from the real-time, online discussions of K–12 students, makes evident that interpersonal-communication features appear in the form of politeness tactics. The results of the study show that there is decreased use of deferential linguistic forms; on the contrary, a variety of verbal and nonverbal devices that denote positive politeness and bald-on-record (i.e., direct speech acts) frequently occur.The commonality of positive politeness and bald-on-record lies in the fact that both tactics are grounded in the nature of the close interpersonal relationships between participants. Such a communication pattern in the real-time, online discourse of K–12 students signifies that cognitive assessment of sociointerpersonal and contextual variables undertaken by speech participants underlies the realization of linguistic politeness. Employment of such politeness tactics indicates that effective and fully realized interpersonal communication plays a vital role in the development of online social interaction.

[1]  Susan C. Herring.  Interactional Coherence in CMC , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Jung-ran Park.  Solidarity and Rapport in Social Interaction , 2008, Handbook of Research on Computer Mediated Communication.

[3]  Jung-ran Park.  Interpersonal and Affective Communication in Synchronous Online Discourse1 , 2007, The Library Quarterly.

[4]  Susan B. Barnes.  Computer-Mediated Communication: Human-to-Human Communication Across the Internet , 2002 .

[5]  Jung-ran Park,et al.  Linguistic politeness and face-work in computer-mediated communication, Part 1: A theoretical framework , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Roland Hausser,et al.  Principles of Pragmatics , 1989 .

[7]  Lorri M. Mon.  User perceptions of digital reference services , 2006 .

[8]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  Cross-Cultural Pragmatics , 1999 .

[9]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Why we blog , 2004, CACM.

[10]  J. T. Irvine.  Formality and Informality in Communicative Events , 1979 .

[11]  Marie L. Radford,et al.  Encountering virtual users: A qualitative investigation of interpersonal communication in chat reference , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  R. Lakoff.  The logic of politeness: or minding your p''s and q''s , 1973 .

[13]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[14]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Structure and evolution of blogspace , 2004, CACM.

[15]  Lynn Westbrook,et al.  Chat reference communication patterns and implications: applying politeness theory , 2007, J. Documentation.