How Brianna Became Bossy and Kofi Came Out Smart: Understanding the Trajectories of Identity and Engagement for Two Group Leaders in a Project-Based Mathematics Classroom

This article addresses equity in mathematics classrooms through a focus on students’ co-constructed trajectories of identity and engagement in cooperative learning groups. I examine how two students who served as group leaders in a projects-based algebra classroom constructed markedly different trajectories of identity and engagement across the academic year. Results showed that group members differentially interpreted their respective project-related directives in gendered ways such that the female group leaders’ displays of authority were positioned as inappropriate, while the male group leaders’ displays were positioned as desirable.RésuméCet article se penche sur la question de l’équité dans les cours de mathématiques par le biais d’une analyse des parcours d’identité et d’engagement construits en collaboration par les étudiants, dans des groupes d’apprentissage coopératifs. J’analyse comment deux élèves, qui étaient les leaders de leur groupe dans un cours d’algèbre à projets, ont construit des parcours d’identité et d’engagement très différents tout au long de l’année scolaire. Les résultats montrent que les membres du groupe ont interprété les directives reçues dans le cadre du projet de façon différenciée en fonction de leur sexe: l’autorité du chef de groupe féminin a été jugée comme inappropriée, tandis que celle du chef de groupe de sexe masculin a été jugée comme positive.

[1]  Indigo Esmonde,et al.  Ideas and Identities: Supporting Equity in Cooperative Mathematics Learning , 2009 .

[2]  Jennifer M. Langer-Osuna,et al.  Toward a model of differential influence in discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, and access within a heated classroom argument , 2008 .

[3]  Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos,et al.  The Effect of Authority on the Persuasiveness of Mathematical Arguments , 2009 .

[4]  B. Davies,et al.  Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves , 1990 .

[5]  D. Jack Silencing the self: Women and depression. , 1991 .

[6]  Julie A. Bianchini,et al.  From here to equity: The influence of status on student access to and understanding of science , 1999 .

[7]  D. Holland Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds , 1998 .

[8]  Leslie R. Herrenkohl,et al.  Participant Structures, Scientific Discourse, and Student Engagement in Fourth Grade , 1998 .

[9]  A. S. Jurow,et al.  Shifting Engagements in Figured Worlds: Middle School Mathematics Students' Participation in an Architectural Design Project , 2005 .

[10]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[11]  E. Cohen,et al.  Producing Equal-Status Interaction in the Heterogeneous Classroom , 1995 .

[12]  N. Webb,et al.  The Development of Students' Helping Behavior and Learning in Peer-Directed Small Groups , 2003 .

[13]  S. Lubienski Research, Reform, and Equity in U.S. Mathematics Education , 2002 .

[14]  M. Goodwin He-Said-She-Said: Talk As Social Organization Among Black Children , 1993 .

[15]  Frederick Erickson,et al.  Definition and Analysis of Data from Videotape: Some Research Procedures and Their Rationales , 2006 .

[16]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[17]  Ricki Goldman,et al.  Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics , 2010 .

[18]  N. Webb Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups. , 1991 .

[19]  Sherry A. Southerland,et al.  Individual and Group Meaning-Making in an Urban Third Grade Classroom: Red Fog, Cold Cans, and Seeping Vapor. , 2005 .

[20]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  The Case of Carla: Dilemmas of Helping All Students to Understand Science , 2002 .

[21]  Kevin M. Leander,et al.  Silencing in Classroom Interaction: Producing and Relating Social Spaces , 2002 .

[22]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  Theoretical Consequences of the Status Characteristics Formulation , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Alexander W. Chizhik,et al.  Equity and Status in Group Collaboration: Learning Through Explanations Depends on Task Characteristics , 2001 .