Phylogeny of Saxifragales (angiosperms, eudicots): analysis of a rapid, ancient radiation.
暂无分享,去创建一个
M Fishbein | D. Soltis | M. Fishbein | C. Hibsch-Jetter | L. Hufford | C Hibsch-Jetter | D E Soltis | L Hufford
[1] D. Soltis,et al. Chloroplast DNA variation within and among genera of the Heuchera group (Saxifragaceae): evidence for chloroplast transfer and paraphyly. , 1991 .
[2] H. Hart,et al. Phylogenetic relationships in the Crassulaceae inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction-site variation. , 1998, American journal of botany.
[3] J. Huelsenbeck. Performance of Phylogenetic Methods in Simulation , 1995 .
[4] J. Lake,et al. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: paralinear distances. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[5] S. B. Hoot,et al. Data Congruence and Phylogeny of the Papaveraceae s.l. Based on Four Data Sets: atpB and rbcL Sequences, trnK Restriction Sites, and Morphological Characters , 1997 .
[6] rbcL sequence divergence and phylogenetic relationships in Saxifragaceae sensu lato. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[7] A. Rodrigo,et al. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. , 2000, Systematic biology.
[8] K. Ro,et al. Molecular phylogenetic study of the Ranunculaceae: utility of the nuclear 26S ribosomal DNA in inferring intrafamilial relationships. , 1997, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[9] Larry Hufford,et al. Rosidae and their relationships to other nonmagnoliid dicotyledons : a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data , 1992 .
[10] W. Maddison. RECONSTRUCTING CHARACTER EVOLUTION ON POLYTOMOUS CLADOGRAMS , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[11] TESTS OF PLEISTOCENE SPECIATION IN MONTANE GRASSHOPPERS (GENUS MELANOPLUS) FROM THE SKY ISLANDS OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[12] Michael M. Miyamoto,et al. TESTING SPECIES PHYLOGENIES AND PHYLOGENETIC METHODS WITH CONGRUENCE , 1995 .
[13] S. B. Hoot,et al. The Utility of atpB Gene Sequences in Resolving Phylogenetic Relationships: Comparison with rbcL and 18S Ribosomal DNA Sequences in the Lardizabalaceae , 1995 .
[14] Junhyong Kim,et al. Large-scale phylogenies and measuring the performance of phylogenetic estimators. , 1998, Systematic biology.
[15] A. Graybeal,et al. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? , 1998, Systematic biology.
[16] D. Soltis,et al. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of Crassulaceae inferred from matK sequence data. , 2001, American journal of botany.
[17] Simon Whelan,et al. Distributions of statistics used for the comparison of models of sequence evolution in phylogenetics , 1999 .
[18] M. Chase,et al. Phylogenetics of the Hamamelidae and Their Allies: Parsimony Analyses of Nucleotide Sequences of the Plastid Gene rbcL , 1998, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[19] R. Gutell,et al. Comprehensive comparison of structural characteristics in eukaryotic cytoplasmic large subunit (23 S-like) ribosomal RNA. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[20] John P. Huelsenbeck,et al. A Likelihood Ratio Test to Detect Conflicting Phylogenetic Signal , 1996 .
[21] T. Moum,et al. POLYTOMIES AND THE POWER OF PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[22] H Kishino,et al. Appropriate likelihood ratio tests and marginal distributions for evolutionary tree models with constraints on parameters. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.
[23] D. Soltis,et al. Molecular Evolution of 18S rDNA in Angiosperms: Implications for Character Weighting in Phylogenetic Analysis , 1998 .
[24] D. Soltis,et al. MATK AND RBCL GENE SEQUENCE DATA INDICATE THAT SAXIFRAGA (SAXIFRAGACEAE) IS POLYPHYLETIC , 1996 .
[25] J. Sullivan. Combining Data with Different Distributions of Among-Site Rate Variation , 1996 .
[26] F. Sperling,et al. Interaction of process partitions in phylogenetic analysis: an example from the swallowtail butterfly genus Papilio. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.
[27] T. Jukes. CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1969 .
[28] J. Huelsenbeck,et al. A Likelihood-Ratio Test of Monophyly , 1996 .
[29] Roderic D. M. Page,et al. Genes, organisms, and areas: the problem of multiple lineages , 1993 .
[30] Bc Haimson,et al. A Simple Method for Estimating In Situ Stresses at Great Depths , 1974 .
[31] M. Chase,et al. Higher-level classification in the angiosperms: new insights from the perspective of DNA sequence data , 2000 .
[32] N. Saitou,et al. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.
[33] E. Conti,et al. Circumscription of Myrtales and their relationships to other rosids: evidence from rbcL sequence data , 1996 .
[34] V. Friesen,et al. POWER AND STOCHASTICITY IN THE RESOLUTION OF SOFT POLYTOMIES: A REPLY TO BRAUN ET AL , 2001 .
[35] D. Soltis,et al. Phylogenetic relationships in Saxifragaceae sensu lato: A comparison of topologies based on 18S rDNA and rbcL sequences. , 1997, American journal of botany.
[36] Phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic angiosperm family Podostemaceae inferred from 18S rDNA and rbcL sequence data. , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[37] Leigh A. Johnson,et al. Assessing Congruence: Empirical Examples from Molecular Data , 1998 .
[38] M. P. Cummings,et al. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.
[39] D. Soltis,et al. Phylogeny, Classification and Floral Evolution of Water Lilies (Nymphaeaceae; Nymphaeales): A Synthesis of Non-molecular, rbcL, matK, and 18S rDNA Data , 1999 .
[40] M. Donoghue,et al. Analyzing large data sets: rbcL 500 revisited. , 1997, Systematic biology.
[41] D. Soltis,et al. Molecular systematics of Saxifragaceae sensu stricto , 1993 .
[42] D. Soltis,et al. MatK DNA Sequences and Phylogenetic Reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s. str , 1994 .
[43] D. Soltis,et al. Phylogenetic relationships among members of Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data , 1993 .
[44] E. Kellogg,et al. Testing for Phylogenetic Conflict Among Molecular Data Sets in the Tribe Triticeae (Gramineae) , 1996 .
[45] D. Hillis,et al. Ribosomal DNA: Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetic Inference , 1991, The Quarterly Review of Biology.
[46] Nick Goldman,et al. MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD TREES FROM DNA SEQUENCES: A PECULIAR STATISTICAL ESTIMATION PROBLEM , 1995 .
[47] B. Hall,et al. Long-branch attraction and the rDNA model of early eukaryotic evolution. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.
[48] Junhyong Kim,et al. Separate Versus Combined Analysis of Phylogenetic Evidence , 1995 .
[49] E. Braun,et al. POLYTOMIES, THE POWER OF PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE, AND THE STOCHASTIC NATURE OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION: A COMMENT ON WALSH ET AL. (1999) , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[50] J. Palmer,et al. Phylogenetic Implications of rbcL Sequence Variation in the Asteraceae , 1992 .
[51] R. Barnes,et al. Phylogenetics and Classification of Cunoniaceae (Oxalidales) Using Chloroplast DNA Sequences and Morphology , 2009 .
[52] J. Felsenstein. CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[53] J. Wakeley,et al. Substitution-rate variation among sites and the estimation of transition bias. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[54] J. Bull,et al. An Empirical Test of Bootstrapping as a Method for Assessing Confidence in Phylogenetic Analysis , 1993 .
[55] P. Herendeen,et al. Phylogenetic pattern, diversity, and diversification of Eudicots , 1999 .
[56] W. Li,et al. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.
[57] J. Palmer,et al. Monophyly of the Asteridae and Identification of Their Major Lineages Inferred From DNA Sequences of rbcL , 1992 .
[58] M. Chase,et al. A COMBINED CLADISTIC ANALYSIS OF ANGIOSPERMS USING RBCL AND NON-MOLECULAR DATA SETS , 1998 .
[59] P. K. Endress,et al. The diversity of stamen structures in ‘Lower’ Rosidae (Rosales, Fabales, Proteales, Sapindales) , 1991 .
[60] J. Doyle,et al. The Bases of Angiosperm Phylogeny: Palynology , 1975 .
[61] C. Bult,et al. TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF INCONGRUENCE , 1994 .
[62] D. Tautz,et al. Evolution and phylogeny of the Diptera: a molecular phylogenetic analysis using 28S rDNA sequences. , 1997, Systematic biology.
[63] C. Rowell,et al. Combined molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Orthoptera (Arthropoda, Insecta) and implications for their higher systematics. , 1999, Systematic biology.
[64] M. Donoghue,et al. The Suitability of Molecular and Morphological Evidence in Reconstructing Plant Phylogeny , 1992 .
[65] Andrew Rambaut,et al. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..
[66] H. Clifford. 12 – Diversity and Classification , 1975 .
[67] Kevin de Queiroz,et al. Phylogenetic Relationships and Tempo of Early Diversification in Anolis Lizards , 1999 .
[68] D. Soltis,et al. Diversification of the North American shrub genus Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae): conflicting phylogenies from nuclear ribosomal DNA and chloroplast DNA. , 2000, American journal of botany.
[69] J. Sullivan,et al. 28S and 18S rDNA sequences support the monophyly of lampreys and hagfishes. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.
[70] J. Thompson,et al. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.
[71] J. Ballard,et al. Data sets, partitions, and characters: philosophies and procedures for analyzing multiple data sets. , 1998, Systematic biology.
[72] J. McGuire,et al. Morphology, molecules, and the phylogenetics of cetaceans. , 1998, Systematic biology.
[73] James F. Smith. Phylogenetics of seed plants : An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL , 1993 .
[74] Michael J. Sanderson,et al. Objections to Bootstrapping Phylogenies: A Critique , 1995 .
[75] S. B. Hoot,et al. Phylogeny of Basal Eudicots Based on Three Molecular Data Sets: atpB, rbcL, and 18s Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Sequences , 1999 .
[76] W. Brown,et al. Amphioxus mitochondrial DNA, chordate phylogeny, and the limits of inference based on comparisons of sequences. , 1998, Systematic biology.
[77] W. Kress,et al. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences , 2000 .
[78] J. Doyle,et al. Trees within trees: genes and species, molecules and morphology. , 1997, Systematic biology.
[79] A. L. Bogle,et al. Phylogenetic relationships of the Hamamelidaceae inferred from sequences of internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA. , 1999, American journal of botany.
[80] D. Soltis,et al. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. , 2000, Systematic biology.
[81] H Philippe,et al. How many nucleotides are required to resolve a phylogenetic problem? The use of a new statistical method applicable to available sequences. , 1994, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[82] D. Maddison. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most , 1991 .
[83] V. Ashworth. Phylogenetic Relationships in Phoradendreae (Viscaceae) Inferred from Three Regions of the Nuclear Ribosomal Cistron. I. Major Lineages and Paraphyly of Phoradendron , 2000 .
[84] F. James Rohlf,et al. ACCURACY OF ESTIMATED PHYLOGENIES: EFFECTS OF TREE TOPOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY MODEL , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[85] William S. Moore,et al. Resolution of phylogenetic relationships among recently evolved species as a function of amount of DNA sequence: an empirical study based on woodpeckers (Aves: Picidae). , 2000, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[86] K. Cullings. Design and testing of a plant‐specific PCR primer for ecological and evolutionary studies , 1992 .
[87] C. Cunningham,et al. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? , 1997, Molecular biology and evolution.
[88] D. Schluter,et al. Using Phylogenies to Test Macroevolutionary Hypotheses of Trait Evolution in Cranes (Gruinae) , 1999, The American Naturalist.
[89] K. Winka,et al. Ribosomal DNA and resolution of branching order among the ascomycota: how many nucleotides are enough? , 2000, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[90] T. Sang,et al. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). , 1997, American journal of botany.
[91] S. Whelan,et al. Statistical tests of gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity in models of sequence evolution in phylogenetics. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.
[92] J. Wendel,et al. Congruence and Consensus in the Cotton Tribe (Malvaceae) , 1997 .
[93] S. Cevallos-Ferriz,et al. Reproductive and vegetative organs with affinities to Haloragaceae from the Upper Cretaceous Huepac Chert Locality of Sonora, Mexico. , 1999, American journal of botany.
[94] E. Pahlich,et al. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue , 1980 .
[95] Hidetoshi Shimodaira,et al. Multiple Comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with Applications to Phylogenetic Inference , 1999, Molecular Biology and Evolution.
[96] M. Donoghue,et al. The Importance of Fossils in Phylogeny Reconstruction , 1989 .
[97] R DeSalle,et al. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. , 1997, Systematic biology.
[98] Arthur Cronquist,et al. Angiosperm Orders and Families. (Book Reviews: An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants) , 1982 .
[99] W. Maddison. Gene Trees in Species Trees , 1997 .
[100] W. John Kress,et al. Angiosperm Phylogeny Inferred from 18S Ribosomal DNA Sequences , 1997 .
[101] D. Soltis,et al. The phylogenetic potential of entire 26S rDNA sequences in plants. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.
[102] D. Hillis,et al. Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.
[103] P. K. Endress. A SUPRAGENERIC TAXONOMIC CLASSIFICATION OF THE HAMAMELIDACEAE , 1989 .
[104] C. Fan. Phylogenetic relationships within Cornus (Cornaceae) based on 26S rDNA sequences. , 2001, American journal of botany.
[105] J. Felsenstein. Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .
[106] A. L. Takhtadzhi︠a︡n. Diversity and classification of flowering plants , 1997 .
[107] Elizabeth A. Kellogg,et al. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants , 1998 .
[108] D. Soltis,et al. Phylogenetic Relationships within Lithophragma (Saxifragaceae): Hybridization, Allopolyploidy, and Ovary Diversification , 1999 .
[109] M. H. Hils,et al. Comparative anatomy and systematics of woody Saxifragaceae. Aphanopetalum Endl. , 1994 .
[110] J. Bull,et al. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[111] R. Olmstead,et al. Patterns of Sequence Evolution and Implications for Parsimony Analysis of Chloroplast DNA , 1998 .
[112] F. Blattner,et al. Charons 36 to 40: multi enzyme, high capacity, recombination deficient replacement vectors with polylinkers and polystuffers. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.
[113] J. Huelsenbeck,et al. SUCCESS OF PHYLOGENETIC METHODS IN THE FOUR-TAXON CASE , 1993 .
[114] B. Bremer,et al. More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny--case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). , 1999, Systematic biology.
[115] M. Steel,et al. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[116] R. Ward,et al. Rapid radiation events in the family Ursidae indicated by likelihood phylogenetic estimation from multiple fragments of mtDNA. , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[117] M. Lavin,et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the cultivated and wild species of Phaseolus (Fabaceae) , 1999 .
[118] N. Saitou. A Theoretical Study of the Underestimation of Branch Lengths by the Maximum Parsimony Principle , 1989 .
[119] M. Chase,et al. Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution. , 1992, Science.
[120] R. Keith Semple,et al. Classification and geography , 1973 .
[121] J. Bull,et al. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis , 1993 .
[122] J. Wiens,et al. MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DICHROMATISM AMONG POPULATIONS OF THE YARROW'S SPINY LIZARD (SCELOPORUS JARROVII) , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[123] K. Hilu,et al. The matK gene: sequence variation and application in plant systematics. , 1997, American journal of botany.
[124] Elizabeth A. Kellogg,et al. Plant Systematics: A Phylogenetic Approach , 2000 .