Estimating Peer Effects on Health in Social Networks

We recently showed that obesity can spread socially from person to person in adults (Christakis and Fowler 2007). A natural question to ask is whether or not these results generalize to a population of adolescents. Three separate teams of researchers have analyzed the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) and shown evidence of person-to-peron spread of obesity, but they use different methods and disagree on the interpretation of their results. Here, we conduct our own analysis of the Add Health data, provide additional evidence from the Framingham Heart Study on the social spread of obesity, and use Monte Carlo simulations to test the econometric methods we use to model peer effects. The results show that the existence of peer effects in body mass is robust to several specifications in both adults and in adolescents.

[1]  Ross A. Hammond,et al.  Exploring Price-Independent Mechanisms in the Obesity Epidemic , 2007 .

[2]  Bernard Fortin,et al.  Identification of Peer Effects through Social Networks , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  J. Harris,et al.  Asymmetric peer effects in the analysis of cigarette smoking among young people in the United States, 1992-1999. , 2008, Journal of health economics.

[4]  C. Manski.  Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[5]  N. Christakis,et al.  A Model of Genetic Variation in Human Social Networks , 2010 .

[6]  M. Rosén.  On randomized controlled trials and lifestyle interventions. , 1989, International journal of epidemiology.

[7]  M. Nerlove,et al.  Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects , 1988 .

[8]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[10]  Tanya Rosenblat,et al.  Social Networks and Vaccination Decisions , 2007 .

[11]  N. Christakis,et al.  SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL FOR: The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network , 2022 .

[12]  T. Halliday,et al.  Identifying Endogenous Peer Effects in the Spread of Obesity , 2007 .

[13]  Ethan Cohen-Cole,et al.  Demonstration effects in preventive care , 2007 .

[14]  N. Christakis,et al.  Self-perception of weight appropriateness in the United States. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  Marc Nerlove,et al.  Further evidence on the estimation of dynamic economic relations from a time series of cross-sections , 1971 .

[16]  A. Clark,et al.  'It Wasn't Me, it Was Them!' Social Influence in Risky Behavior by Adolescents , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[17]  Mary A. Burke,et al.  Social Dynamics of Obesity , 2006 .

[18]  Muzhe Yang,et al.  Asymmetric Association between Exposure to Obesity and Weight Gain among Adolescents , 2010 .

[19]  H. Raspe,et al.  Back pain, a communicable disease? , 2008 .

[20]  A. Okunade,et al.  Overweight Adolescents and On-time High School Graduation: Racial and Gender Disparities , 2009 .

[21]  T. Halliday,et al.  3610 Weight Gain in Adolescents and Their Peers , 2008 .

[22]  T. Valente,et al.  Identifying Opinion Leaders to Promote Behavior Change , 2007, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[23]  N. Christakis,et al.  Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  G. King,et al.  Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[25]  Hana Ross,et al.  The importance of peer effects, cigarette prices and tobacco control policies for youth smoking behavior. , 2005, Journal of health economics.

[26]  N. Christakis.  Social networks and collateral health effects , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis , 2005 .