Priority Choice Experimental Two-Qubit Tomography: Measuring One by One All Elements of Density Matrices

In standard optical tomographic methods, the off-diagonal elements of a density matrix ρ are measured indirectly. Thus, the reconstruction of ρ, even if it is based on linear inversion, typically magnifies small errors in the experimental data. Recently, an optimal tomography solution measuring all the elements of ρ one-by-one without error magnification has been theoretically proposed. We implemented this method for two-qubit polarization states. For comparison, we also experimentally implemented other well-known tomographic protocols, either based solely on local measurements (of, e.g., the Pauli operators and James-Kwiat-Munro-White projectors) or with mutually unbiased bases requiring both local and global measurements. We reconstructed seventeen separable, partially and maximally entangled two-qubit polarization states. Our experiments show that our method has the highest stability against errors in comparison to other quantum tomographies. In particular, we demonstrate that each optimally-reconstructed state is embedded in an uncertainty circle of the smallest radius, both in terms of trace distance and disturbance. We explain how to experimentally estimate uncertainty radii for all the implemented tomographies and show that, for each reconstructed state, the relevant uncertainty circles intersect indicating the approximate location of the corresponding physical density matrix.

[1]  N. Houlsby,et al.  Adaptive Bayesian quantum tomography , 2011, 1107.0895.

[2]  Franco Nori,et al.  Quantum technologies: an old new story , 2012 .

[3]  Eli Upfal,et al.  Probability and Computing: Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis , 2005 .

[4]  Giuseppe Vallone,et al.  Polarization entangled states measurement on a chip , 2011, Optics + Optoelectronics.

[5]  Edo Waks,et al.  Ultra-bright source of polarization-entangled photons , 1999 .

[6]  Z. Hradil Quantum-state estimation , 1996, quant-ph/9609012.

[7]  W. Vogel,et al.  Least-squares inversion for density-matrix reconstruction , 1997 .

[8]  Alexei Gilchrist,et al.  Choice of measurement sets in qubit tomography , 2007, 0706.3756.

[9]  J. G. Skellam The frequency distribution of the difference between two Poisson variates belonging to different populations. , 1946, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A.

[10]  Robert W. Boyd,et al.  Full characterization of polarization states of light via direct measurement , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[11]  Jan Soubusta,et al.  Experimental linear-optical implementation of a multifunctional optimal qubit cloner , 2012 .

[12]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Improving quantum state estimation with mutually unbiased bases. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[13]  Yu. I. Bogdanov,et al.  Statistical estimation of the quality of quantum-tomography protocols , 2011, 1106.2056.

[14]  Yu I Bogdanov,et al.  Statistical estimation of the efficiency of quantum state tomography protocols. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[15]  A. Černoch,et al.  Experimental simulation of a polarization-dispersion-fluctuating channel with photon pairs , 2012 .

[16]  J. Stoer,et al.  Introduction to Numerical Analysis , 2002 .

[17]  E. Jeffrey,et al.  Phase-compensated ultra-bright source of entangled photons , 2005, 2005 Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference.

[18]  Maity Gouranga,et al.  COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF , 2018 .

[19]  R. Blume-Kohout Hedged maximum likelihood quantum state estimation. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[20]  Yu. I. Bogdanov,et al.  Optimization of a quantum tomography protocol for polarization qubits , 2010 .

[21]  Efficient amplification of photonic qubits by optimal quantum cloning , 2013, 1310.1768.

[22]  R. Blume-Kohout Optimal, reliable estimation of quantum states , 2006, quant-ph/0611080.

[23]  Y. S. Teo,et al.  Quantum-state reconstruction by maximizing likelihood and entropy. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[24]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[25]  Kendall E. Atkinson An introduction to numerical analysis , 1978 .

[26]  Ruediger Schack,et al.  Unknown Quantum States and Operations, a Bayesian View , 2004, quant-ph/0404156.

[27]  Giuseppe Vallone,et al.  Polarization entangled state measurement on a chip , 2010, CLEO: 2011 - Laser Science to Photonic Applications.

[28]  M. Ježek,et al.  Iterative algorithm for reconstruction of entangled states , 2000, quant-ph/0009093.

[29]  Harald Niederreiter,et al.  Probability and computing: randomized algorithms and probabilistic analysis , 2006, Math. Comput..

[30]  Paul G. Kwiat,et al.  Photonic State Tomography , 2005 .

[31]  Y. S. Teo,et al.  Incomplete quantum state estimation: A comprehensive study , 2012, 1202.1713.

[32]  John A Smolin,et al.  Efficient method for computing the maximum-likelihood quantum state from measurements with additive Gaussian noise. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[33]  Andrew G. White,et al.  Measurement of qubits , 2001, quant-ph/0103121.

[34]  Jan Soubusta,et al.  Experimental eavesdropping based on optimal quantum cloning. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[35]  J. Lundeen,et al.  Procedure for direct measurement of general quantum states using weak measurement. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[36]  Franco Nori,et al.  Optimal two-qubit tomography based on local and global measurements: Maximal robustness against errors as described by condition numbers , 2014, 1409.4622.

[37]  Franco Nori,et al.  Quantum state tomography of large nuclear spins in a semiconductor quantum well: Optimal robustness against errors as quantified by condition numbers , 2014, 1410.2440.

[38]  Milja Medic,et al.  Entangled photon polarimetry , 2010, CLEO/QELS: 2010 Laser Science to Photonic Applications.

[39]  P. Oscar Boykin,et al.  A New Proof for the Existence of Mutually Unbiased Bases , 2002, Algorithmica.

[40]  A. Černoch,et al.  Experimental implementation of the multifunctional compact two-photon state analyzer. , 2012, Applied optics.

[41]  Daoyi Dong,et al.  Quantum State Tomography via Linear Regression Estimation , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[42]  J. Lundeen,et al.  Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction , 2011, Nature.

[43]  S D Bartlett,et al.  Measuring a photonic qubit without destroying it. , 2004, Physical review letters.