The Effect of Neighbor Graph Connectivity on Coverage Redundancy in Wireless Sensor Networks

Coverage redundancy problem is one of the significant problems in wireless sensor networks. To reduce the energy consumption that arises when the high number of sensors is active, various coverage control protocols (sleep scheduling algorithms) have been proposed. In these protocols, a subset of nodes necessary to maintain sufficient sensing coverage are kept active while the others are put into a sleep mode to reduce the energy consumption. In this paper, we study the coverage redundancy problem in a sensor network where the locations of nodes and the distances between nodes are neither known nor could be easily calculated. We define a neighbor graph as the graph formed by the neighbors of a node and analyze the effect of different levels of connectivity in neighbor graphs on the coverage redundancy of sensor nodes. Moreover, we apply our results to a lightweight deployment-aware scheduling algorithm and demonstrate the improvement in the performance of the algorithm.

[1]  Jennifer C. Hou,et al.  Maintaining Sensing Coverage and Connectivity in Large Sensor Networks , 2005, Ad Hoc Sens. Wirel. Networks.

[2]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[3]  Romit Roy Choudhury,et al.  Location-Independent Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2022 .

[4]  Li-Hsing Yen,et al.  Range-Based Sleep Scheduling (RBSS) for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[5]  Yang Xiao,et al.  IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, PAPER ID: TPDS-0307-0605.R1 1 Random Coverage with Guaranteed Connectivity: Joint Scheduling for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2022 .

[6]  József Balogh,et al.  On k-coverage in a mostly sleeping sensor network , 2004, MobiCom '04.

[7]  Eyuphan Bulut,et al.  DSSP: A Dynamic Sleep Scheduling Protocol for Prolonging the Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW'07).

[8]  Santiago Felici,et al.  Exploiting Mobility for Efficient Coverage in Sparse Wireless Sensor Networks , 2010, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[9]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Computing with Time: From Neural Networks to Sensor Networks , 2008, Comput. J..

[10]  Songwu Lu,et al.  PEAS: a robust energy conserving protocol for long-lived sensor networks , 2003, 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2003. Proceedings..

[11]  Yang Xiao,et al.  Lightweight Deployment-Aware Scheduling for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005, Mob. Networks Appl..

[12]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[13]  Cheng Fu,et al.  Layered Diffusion based Coverage Control in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007 .