Imaging Physics

The adequate and repeatable performance of the image display system is a key element of information technology platforms in a modern radiology department. However, despite the wide availability of high-end computing platforms and advanced color and gray-scale monitors, the quality and properties of the final displayed medical image may often be inadequate for diagnostic purposes if the displays are not configured and maintained properly. In this article-an expanded version of the Radiological Society of North America educational module "Image Display"-the authors discuss fundamentals of image display hardware, quality control and quality assurance processes for optimal image interpretation settings, and parameters of the viewing environment that influence reader performance. Radiologists, medical physicists, and other allied professionals should strive to understand the role of display technology and proper usage for a quality radiology practice. The display settings and display quality control and quality assurance processes described in this article can help ensure high standards of perceived image quality and image interpretation accuracy.

[1]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  ACR–AAPM–SIIM Technical Standard for Electronic Practice of Medical Imaging , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[2]  Rachel Toomey,et al.  The impact of acoustic noise found within clinical departments on radiology performance. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[3]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Introduction to Grayscale Calibration and Related Aspects of Medical Imaging Grade Liquid Crystal Displays , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[4]  L. Berlin,et al.  Reporting the "missed" radiologic diagnosis: medicolegal and ethical considerations. , 1994, Radiology.

[5]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[6]  Ying Lu,et al.  An update survey of academic radiologists' clinical productivity. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[7]  Y. Nakajima,et al.  Radiologist supply and workload: international comparison , 2008, Radiation Medicine.

[8]  A Badano,et al.  High-fidelity electronic display of digital radiographs. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  Arvin W. Hahn REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT , 1964 .

[10]  L. Berlin Liability of interpreting too many radiographs. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: technological and psychophysical considerations for digital mammographic displays. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[12]  Maria Kallergi,et al.  Choosing a radiology workstation: technical and clinical considerations. , 2007, Radiology.

[13]  E. Krupinski,et al.  Searching for lung nodules. Visual dwell indicates locations of false-positive and false-negative decisions. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[14]  J. Forrester,et al.  The Eye: Basic Sciences in Practice , 2002 .

[15]  L. Berlin,et al.  Malpractice issues in radiology. Perceptual errors. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Dorothy Wallace,et al.  Audit of the change in the on-call practices in neuroradiology and factors affecting it , 2006, BMC Medical Imaging.

[17]  H L Kundel,et al.  Peripheral vision, structured noise and film reader error. , 1973, Radiology.

[18]  J W Oestmann,et al.  Lung lesions: correlation between viewing time and detection. , 1988, Radiology.

[19]  Mythreyi Bhargavan,et al.  The state of teleradiology in 2003 and changes since 1999. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Jonathan H Sunshine,et al.  Update on the diagnostic radiology employment market: findings through 2007-2008. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[21]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  Noise of LCD display systems , 2003, CARS.

[22]  Oleg S. Pianykh,et al.  Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) , 2017, Radiopaedia.org.

[23]  Peter G. J. Barten,et al.  Physical model for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[24]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. , 2005, Medical physics.

[25]  Jonathan H Sunshine,et al.  Determinants of radiologists' desired workloads. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[26]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[27]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  Measurement of visual strain in radiologists , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[28]  W. Riad,et al.  Anesthesiologists work-related exhaustion: A comparison study with other hospital employees , 2011, Saudi journal of anaesthesia.

[29]  H L Kundel,et al.  Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. , 1978, Investigative radiology.

[30]  Kevin M. Schartz,et al.  Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[31]  R. Fitzgerald Error in radiology. , 2001, Clinical radiology.

[32]  Mythreyi Bhargavan,et al.  Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations. , 2005, Radiology.

[33]  J. Higginson Perspective: limiting resident work hours is a moral concern. , 2009, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[34]  Peter G. J. Barten,et al.  Spatiotemporal model for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its temporal aspects , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[35]  V. LeBlanc The Effects of Acute Stress on Performance: Implications for Health Professions Education , 2009, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[36]  D J Vining,et al.  Interpretation of abdominal CT: analysis of errors and their causes. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[37]  T. Heponiemi,et al.  Mitigating on‐call symptoms through organizational justice and job control: a cross‐sectional study among Finnish anesthesiologists , 2009, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[38]  L. Berlin,et al.  Perceptual errors and negligence. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[39]  Harold L. Kundel,et al.  Perception Errors in Chest Radiography , 1989 .

[40]  C. Nodine,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual and Cognitive Factors in Radiographic Interpretation , 1980, Perception.

[41]  Neal Rogness,et al.  Implementing a Fatigue Countermeasures Program for Nurses: A Focus Group Analysis , 2010, The Journal of nursing administration.

[42]  P. Ros,et al.  Volume and impact of second-opinion consultations by radiologists at a tertiary care cancer center: data. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[43]  L. Berlin,et al.  Malpractice and radiologists in Cook County, IL: trends in 20 years of litigation. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[44]  Elizabeth A Krupinski,et al.  Do long radiology workdays affect nodule detection in dynamic CT interpretation? , 2012, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.