An accurate and ultrafast method for estimating three-dimensional radiological dose rate fields from arbitrary atmospheric radionuclide distributions

Abstract The three-dimensional (3D) distribution of radiological dose rate is important for assessing the biological hazard of atmospheric radionuclides in the environment. Because of the complexity of such scenarios, existing methods only estimate one- or two-dimensional dose rates, and trade accuracy and generality for acceptable speed. The lack of efficient 3D estimation methods prevents the 3D biological effect assessment of atmospheric radionuclides. This paper presents a 3D dose rate field estimation method that accelerates the computation by several orders of magnitude without loss of accuracy or generality. This method reformulates the time-consuming 3D integral in the dose rate model as a convolution and uses a fast Fourier transform to accelerate its solution. The convolution form provides a new receptor-oriented insight into dose rate estimation that can flexibly describe the radiological response of biological tissues. The proposed method makes no approximations or assumptions, so it is accurate and applicable to arbitrary atmospheric dispersion models and radionuclide distributions. Our approach is validated by both simulations and a field experiment. The results show that the proposed method is accurate and fast in both simple and highly complex air dispersion scenarios, and provides better quantitative and qualitative agreement with the experimental data than RIMPUFF's tabulated method. This method bridges the long-standing gap between the refined 3D atmospheric radionuclide transport modelling and the corresponding 3D biological hazard evaluation.

[1]  Qu Jing,et al.  Status and Perspective on the Research and Development of the Chinese Decision Support System for Nuclear Emergency Management , 2001 .

[2]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest , 1995 .

[3]  K M Prise,et al.  A review of the bystander effect and its implications for low-dose exposure. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[4]  Richard Wakeford,et al.  Long-term effects of radiation exposure on health , 2015, The Lancet.

[5]  Ruben Avila,et al.  A 3-D Lagrangian (Monte Carlo) Method for Direct Plume Gamma Dose Rate Calculations , 2001 .

[6]  Torben Mikkelsen,et al.  Atmospheric dispersion of argon-41 from a nuclear research reactor: measurement and modelling of plume geometry and gamma radiation field , 2003 .

[7]  S Raza,et al.  A 3D Lagrangian particle model for direct plume gamma dose rate calculations. , 2001, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[8]  R Venkatesan,et al.  Simulation of radioactive plume gamma dose over a complex terrain using Lagrangian particle dispersion model. , 2015, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[9]  P. Armand,et al.  SIMULATION OF THE PLUME GAMMA EXPOSURE RATE WITH 3 D LAGRANGIAN PARTICLE MODEL SPRAY AND POST-PROCESSOR CLOUD _ SHINE , 2007 .

[10]  Moon-Hee Han,et al.  SPHERICAL APPROXIMATION IN GAMMA DOSE CALCULATIONS AND ITS APPLICATION TO AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTION AT KORI REACTOR SITE IN KOREA , 1995 .

[11]  Leisa Dyer,et al.  Model evaluation of RIMPUFF within complex terrain using an 41 Ar radiological dataset , 2012 .

[12]  J G Bartzis,et al.  A gamma radiation dose calculation method for use with Lagrangian puff atmospheric dispersion models used in real-time emergency response systems. , 2010, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[13]  Torben Mikkelsen,et al.  Experimental evaluation of gamma fluence-rate predictions from Argon-41 releases to the atmosphere over a nuclear research reactor site. , 2004, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[14]  Joji M. Otaki,et al.  The biological impacts of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the pale grass blue butterfly , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[15]  S. Hanna,et al.  Air quality model performance evaluation , 2004 .

[16]  J. W. Healy,et al.  RADIOACTIVE CLOUD-DOSE CALCULATIONS. , 1968 .

[17]  Torben Mikkelsen,et al.  Measurements of plume geometry and argon-41 radiation field at the BR1 reactor in Mol, Belgium , 2002 .

[18]  V I Tarasov,et al.  Reduced integral solutions for gamma absorbed dose from Gaussian plume. , 1995, Health physics.

[19]  D. J. Brenner Conversion Coefficients for Use in Radiological Protection against External Radiation , 1999 .

[20]  Zhengang Shi,et al.  A new finite cloud method for calculating external exposure dose in a nuclear emergency , 2004 .

[21]  Petr Pecha,et al.  An unconventional adaptation of a classical Gaussian plume dispersion scheme for the fast assessment of external irradiation from a radioactive cloud , 2014 .

[22]  E Cardis,et al.  Radiation exposure to the population of Europe following the Chernobyl accident. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[23]  Gianni Tinarelli,et al.  A NEW OPERATIONAL APPROACH TO DEAL WITH DISPERSION AROUND OBSTACLES: THE MSS (MICRO SWIFT SPRAY) SOFTWARE SUITE , 2004 .

[24]  A. Unal,et al.  Simulation of ¹³⁷Cs transport and deposition after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident and radiological doses over the Anatolian peninsula. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  Yan Wang,et al.  Comparisons between a new point kernel-based scheme and the infinite plane source assumption method for radiation calculation of deposited airborne radionuclides from nuclear power plants. , 2018, Journal of environmental radioactivity.