RSM approach for stochastic sensitivity analysis of the economic sustainability of a methanol production plant using renewable energy sources

Abstract This study aims at investigating the economic viability, at the pre-feasibility level, of a 5 MW electrolyser base-methanol production plant, coupled with a PV power plant. The Authors investigated the impact of different parameters, such as the PV plant size, the electrical energy cost and the components capital costs on the methanol production cost and on the system economic viability. It was also analyzed the minimum recommended sale price of the methanol in order to assure an adequate time frame for the return of the investment, considering a different combination of the investigated parameters. An economic sensitivity analysis, based on the RSM approach, was performed in order to define the most promising economic conditions under which the plant can be considered a profitable investment in terms of ARR. A guide for an economically viable plant design, allowing for the identification of the most suitable combination of the economic parameters, was proposed as a kind of “maps of existence”. For the reference case, the Methanol Production Cost (MPC) resulted around 324 €/ton and the minimum methanol sale price to achieve a PBP of 10 years. The sensitivity analysis identified the cost of electricity and the capital cost of the electrolyser as the most affecting parameters for the system economic viability. In terms of ARR, the methanol price represents the most significant factor. Considering a methanol sale price ranging between 400 and 1200 €/ton, the ARR varied from 5% (20 year of PBP) to 20% (5years of PBP). From the environmental point of view, it is worth underling that the methanol production plant here proposed allows to recycle about 5800 tons of CO2 per year and to avoid the consumption of about 5.2 MNm3 of NG per year (compared to the traditional production).

[1]  M. Asif,et al.  Catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 from 600 MW supercritical coal power plant to produce methanol: A techno-economic analysis , 2018 .

[2]  Grazia Leonzio State of art and perspectives about the production of methanol, dimethyl ether and syngas by carbon dioxide hydrogenation , 2018, Journal of CO2 Utilization.

[3]  Orhan Ekren,et al.  Size optimization of a PV/wind hybrid energy conversion system with battery storage using response surface methodology , 2008 .

[5]  Yaşar Demirel,et al.  Chemical storage of wind energy by renewable methanol production: Feasibility analysis using a multi-criteria decision matrix , 2015 .

[6]  Martijn Gough Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[7]  Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,et al.  Catalytic carbon dioxide hydrogenation to methanol: A review of recent studies , 2014 .

[8]  Giulia Bozzano,et al.  Efficient methanol synthesis: Perspectives, technologies and optimization strategies , 2016 .

[9]  Aristide F. Massardo,et al.  Hydro-methane and methanol combined production from hydroelectricity and biomass: Thermo-economic analysis in Paraguay , 2014 .

[10]  Aristide F. Massardo,et al.  Feasibility study of methanol production from different renewable sources and thermo-economic analysis , 2016 .

[11]  Chakib Bouallou,et al.  Investigation of power-to-methanol processes coupling electrolytic hydrogen production and catalytic CO2 reduction , 2016 .

[12]  G. Tsatsaronis,et al.  CO2-utilization in the synthesis of methanol: Potential analysis and exergetic assessment , 2019, Energy.

[13]  A. Massardo,et al.  Feasibility study of methanol production plant from hydrogen and captured carbon dioxide , 2017 .

[14]  J. Ascough,et al.  Using Response Surface Methodology for Economic and Environmental Trade-offs at the Farm Level , 2013 .

[15]  Christophe Blecker,et al.  Optimization of formic/acetic acid delignification of Miscanthus × giganteus for enzymatic hydrolysis using response surface methodology , 2012 .

[16]  Emmanuel Kakaras,et al.  Investigation of technical and economic aspects for methanol production through CO2 hydrogenation , 2016 .

[17]  C. Bouallou,et al.  Design and simulation of a methanol production plant from CO2 hydrogenation , 2013 .

[18]  L. Magistri,et al.  Techno-economic analysis for the integration of a power to fuel system with a CCS coal power plant , 2019, Journal of CO2 Utilization.

[19]  Aristide F. Massardo,et al.  Thermo-economic comparison of hydrogen and hydro-methane produced from hydroelectric energy for land transportation , 2015 .

[20]  C. Cormos,et al.  Improving methanol synthesis from carbon-free H2 and captured CO2: A techno-economic and environmental evaluation , 2018 .

[21]  E. Tzimas,et al.  Methanol synthesis using captured CO2 as raw material: Techno-economic and environmental assessment , 2016 .

[22]  Jovana Grahovac,et al.  Optimization of ethanol production from thick juice: A response surface methodology approach , 2012 .

[23]  Lucia Cassettari,et al.  A design of experiments/response surface methodology approach to study the economic sustainability of a 1MWe photovoltaic plant , 2015 .

[24]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[25]  Lucia Cassettari,et al.  Stochastic techno-economic assessment based on Monte Carlo simulation and the Response Surface Methodology: The case of an innovative linear Fresnel CSP (concentrated solar power) system , 2016 .

[26]  G. Versteeg,et al.  CO2 capture from power plants. Part I: A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine , 2007 .

[27]  Carlos M. Silva,et al.  Simulation and techno-economic optimization of the supercritical CO2 extraction of Eucalyptus globulus bark at industrial scale , 2019, The Journal of Supercritical Fluids.

[28]  R C Brown,et al.  Process optimization of an auger pyrolyzer with heat carrier using response surface methodology. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[29]  Yang Wang,et al.  An overview of methanol as an internal combustion engine fuel , 2015 .

[30]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .