Bridging event-related potentials with behavioral studies in motor learning

Behavioral approaches and electrophysiology in understanding human sensorimotor systems have both yielded substantial advancements in past decades. In fact, behavioral neuroscientists have found that motor learning involves the two distinct processes of the implicit and the explicit. Separately, they have also distinguished two kinds of errors that drive motor learning: sensory prediction error and task error. Scientists in electrophysiology, in addition, have discovered two motor-related, event-related potentials (ERPs): error-related negativity (ERN), and feedback-related negativity (FRN). However, there has been a lack of interchange between the two lines of research. This article, therefore, will survey through the literature in both directions, attempting to establish a bridge between these two fruitful lines of research.

[1]  Jonathan S. Tsay,et al.  Advanced feedback enhances sensorimotor adaptation , 2022, Current Biology.

[2]  Xueqian Deng,et al.  Understanding implicit and explicit sensorimotor learning through neural dynamics , 2022, Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience.

[3]  Hidehiko K. Inagaki,et al.  Neural Algorithms and Circuits for Motor Planning. , 2022, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  Darius E. Parvin,et al.  Distinct Neural Signatures of Outcome Monitoring After Selection and Execution Errors , 2022, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Hyosub E. Kim,et al.  Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning , 2021, bioRxiv.

[6]  S. Segalowitz,et al.  Medial frontal negativities predict performance improvements during motor sequence but not motor adaptation learning , 2020, Psychophysiology.

[7]  T. Komiyama,et al.  Context-dependent plasticity of adult-born neurons regulated by cortical feedback , 2020, Science Advances.

[8]  Hyosub E. Kim,et al.  The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  T. Komiyama,et al.  Plasticity in olfactory bulb circuits , 2020, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  Abigail A. Russo,et al.  Neural Trajectories in the Supplementary Motor Area and Motor Cortex Exhibit Distinct Geometries, Compatible with Different Classes of Computation , 2019, Neuron.

[11]  Paul L Gribble,et al.  Neural signatures of reward and sensory error feedback processing in motor learning. , 2019, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Aaron L. Wong,et al.  Motor Learning. , 2019, Comprehensive Physiology.

[13]  Welber Marinovic,et al.  Task Errors Drive Memories That Improve Sensorimotor Adaptation , 2019, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Jordan A Taylor,et al.  Dissociable cognitive strategies for sensorimotor learning , 2019, Nature Communications.

[15]  Mathias Hegele,et al.  Accuracy of Motor Error Predictions for Different Sensory Signals , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[16]  Richard B Ivry,et al.  The influence of task outcome on implicit motor learning , 2018, eLife.

[17]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  The Error-Related Negativity , 2018, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[18]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Characteristics of Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation Revealed by Task-irrelevant Clamped Feedback , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  R. Ivry,et al.  Delayed feedback during sensorimotor learning selectively disrupts adaptation but not strategy use. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  N. Chaudhari,et al.  Breadth of tuning in taste afferent neurons varies with stimulus strength , 2015, Nature Communications.

[21]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Motor Planning , 2015, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[22]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Contributions to Learning in a Sensorimotor Adaptation Task , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Supplementary materials for : Cortical activity in the null space : permitting preparation without movement , 2014 .

[24]  Marcus Cheetham,et al.  Development of ERN together with an internal model of audio-motor associations , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[25]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Flexible Cognitive Strategies during Motor Learning , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  Jutta Stahl,et al.  Error detection and the use of internal and external error indicators: an investigation of the first-indicator hypothesis. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[27]  Maarten A. S. Boksem,et al.  The Importance of Failure: Feedback Related Negativity Predicts Motor Learning Efficiency , 2009, NeuroImage.

[28]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor learning , 2010, Current Biology.

[30]  M. Sommer,et al.  Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Internal and external information in error processing , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[32]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Gopal Santhanam,et al.  Preparatory activity in premotor and motor cortex reflects the speed of the upcoming reach. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  J. Krakauer,et al.  An Implicit Plan Overrides an Explicit Strategy during Visuomotor Adaptation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[36]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[37]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[38]  F. Vidal,et al.  Is the ‘error negativity’ specific to errors? , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[39]  C. Braun,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Following Incorrect Feedback in a Time-Estimation Task: Evidence for a Generic Neural System for Error Detection , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind. , 1996 .

[41]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[42]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Forward Models: Supervised Learning with a Distal Teacher , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[44]  A. Haith,et al.  Model-based and model-free mechanisms of human motor learning. , 2013, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[45]  M G Coles,et al.  A brain potential manifestation of error-related processing. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.