An extension to the hypothesis of the asynchrony of visual consciousness

An existing hypothesis states that visual consciousness is made up of ‘microconsciousnesses’ occurring asynchronously in several sites of the visual system of the brain with no need for direct means of binding. We extend this hypothesis to define what qualifies a neural activity for generating an element of consciousness to distinguish it from one that does not. We argue that, for these separate neural activities to represent elements of a compound sense of consciousness, they each need the support of sites that unconsciously process an important attentional referent and that it is the commonality of such referents in differing sites which bring the microconsciousnesses together. We consider the broader implications of this extended hypothesis for other sensory modalities and mental imagery.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  Igor Aleksander,et al.  Neurocomputational Models of Visualisation: A Preliminary Report , 1999, IWANN.

[3]  S. Shipp,et al.  The functional logic of cortical connections , 1988, Nature.

[4]  S. Zeki,et al.  The asynchrony of consciousness , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  C. Sherrington Man On His Nature , 1940 .

[6]  C. Koch,et al.  Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? , 1995, Nature.

[7]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Image and mind , 1982 .

[8]  S. Zeki A vision of the brain , 1993 .

[9]  C Luzzatti,et al.  Unilateral neglect, representational schema and consciousness. , 1979, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  M. Velmans A reflexive science of consciousness. , 1993, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[11]  Igor Aleksander,et al.  Impossible Minds: My Neurons, My Consciousness , 1996 .

[12]  Cheves West Perky An Experimental study of imagination. , 1910 .