Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.

Recently, Boege and Janssen [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1810-1818 (2002)] fit linear equations to distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output (UO) functions after the DPOAE level (in dB SPL) was converted into pressure (in microPa). Significant correlations were observed between these DPOAE thresholds and audiometric thresholds. The present study extends their work by (1) evaluating the effect of frequency, (2) determining the behavioral thresholds in those conditions that did not meet inclusion criteria, and (3) including a wider range of stimulus levels. DPOAE I/O functions were measured in as many as 278 ears of subjects with normal and impaired hearing. Nine f2 frequencies (500 to 8000 Hz in 1/2-octave steps) were used, L2 ranged from 10 to 85 dB SPL (5-dB steps), and L1 was set according to the equation L1 = 0.4L2 + 39 dB [Kummer et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3431-3444 (1998)] for L2 levels up to 65 dB SPL, beyond which L1 = L2. For the same conditions as those used by Boege and Janssen, we observed a frequency effect such that correlations were higher for mid-frequency threshold comparisons. In addition, a larger proportion of conditions not meeting inclusion criteria at mid and high frequencies had hearing losses exceeding 30 dB HL, compared to lower frequencies. These results suggest that DPOAE I/O functions can be used to predict audiometric thresholds with greater accuracy at mid and high frequencies, but only when certain inclusion criteria are met. When the SNR inclusion criterion is not met, the expected amount of hearing loss increases. Increasing the range of input levels from 20-65 dB SPL to 10-85 dB SPL increased the number of functions meeting inclusion criteria and increased the overall correlation between DPOAE and behavioral thresholds.

[1]  M P Gorga,et al.  Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  M P Gorga,et al.  The use of cumulative distributions to determine critical values and levels of confidence for clinical distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  M P Gorga,et al.  Comparison between intensity and pressure as measures of sound level in the ear canal. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[6]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  T. Janssen,et al.  The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Peter Dallos,et al.  Two-tone suppression and intermodulation distortion in the cochlea: Effect of outer hair cell lesions , 1980 .

[9]  Tiffany A. Johnson,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  R. A. Schmiedt,et al.  Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  T. Janssen,et al.  Growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in tinnitus. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Glen K. Martin,et al.  Distortion Product Emissions in Humans , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[13]  S. Neely,et al.  From Laboratory to Clinic: A Large Scale Study of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Ears with Normal Hearing and Ears with Hearing Loss , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[14]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss: performance regarding sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics. , 1996, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[15]  Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  B P Kimberley,et al.  Predicting Pure Tone Thresholds in Normal and Hearing‐Impaired Ears with Distortion Product Emission and Age , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[17]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. Siegel,et al.  Ear‐canal standing waves and high‐frequency sound calibration using otoacoustic emission probes , 1994 .

[19]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[20]  William E. Brownell,et al.  Outer Hair Cell Electromotility and Otoacoustic Emissions , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[21]  D A Nelson,et al.  Distortion product emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. , 1989, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[22]  Paul Boege,et al.  Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.