P53 alteration and microsatellite instability have predictive value for survival benefit from chemotherapy in stage III colorectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE We recently presented evidence for tumor site and gender-specificity in the survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). In the current study, we examined whether p53 alteration or the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype provide additional predictive information in CRC patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A retrospective series of 891 Stage III CRC patients with negative surgical margins was investigated. Thirty percent (270 of 891) received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with curative intent and comprising of 5-fluorouracil/levamisole. Adjuvant treatment and nontreatment patient groups were well matched for tumor site, grade, p53 alterations, and MSI. Surgical tumor specimens were investigated for p53 overexpression using immunohistochemistry and for p53 mutation and MSI using single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. The predictive value of these markers was evaluated by comparing the survival of adjuvant-treated and nonadjuvant treated patients. RESULTS A strong inverse correlation was observed between p53 alteration and MSI (P < 0.0001). In univariate analysis, the factors of sex, site, p53 alteration, and MSI were each strong predictors of a survival benefit from chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that chemotherapy provided maximal survival benefit for female patients (P = 0.005) and for patients whose tumors contained normal p53 (P = 0.041). Males whose tumors contained a p53 alteration and were negative for MSI appeared not to benefit from chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that p53 alteration and MSI could be clinically useful molecular predictive markers for the identification of CRC patients who might benefit from 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

[1]  L. Aaltonen,et al.  Microsatellite instability is a favorable prognostic indicator in patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy. , 2000, Gastroenterology.

[2]  M. Perucho,et al.  Late onset and high incidence of colon cancer of the mutator phenotype with hypermethylated hMLH1 gene in women. , 2000, Gastroenterology.

[3]  David Joseph,et al.  Association of tumour site and sex with survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer , 2000, The Lancet.

[4]  R. Vossen,et al.  Complete sequencing of TP53 predicts poor response to systemic therapy of advanced breast cancer. , 2000, Cancer research.

[5]  B. Iacopetta,et al.  Routine analysis of p53 mutation in clinical breast tumor specimens using fluorescence-based polymerase chain reaction and single strand conformation polymorphism. , 2000, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[6]  D. Haller Defining the optimal therapy for rectal cancer. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  B. Iacopetta,et al.  Evidence for tumour site and gender-specific survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer: Molecular predictive markers come of age , 2000 .

[8]  A. Flahault,et al.  p53 gene status as a predictor of tumor response to induction chemotherapy of patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  D. Smith,et al.  p53 point mutation and survival in colorectal cancer patients: effect of disease dissemination and tumour location. , 1999, International journal of oncology.

[10]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Disruption of p53 in human cancer cells alters the responses to therapeutic agents. , 1999, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[11]  J. Herman,et al.  CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Miike,et al.  Aberrant methylation of p16INK4a in anatomic and gender-specific subtypes of sporadic colorectal cancer. , 1999, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[13]  G. Capellá,et al.  p53 and K-ras gene mutations correlate with tumor aggressiveness but are not of routine prognostic value in colorectal cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  L. Påhlman,et al.  Prognostic value of p53 genetic changes in colorectal cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  p53 sequence analysis predicts treatment response and outcome of patients with esophageal carcinoma , 1998, Cancer.

[16]  P. Bunn,et al.  Ki-ras mutation and p53 overexpression predict the clinical behavior of colorectal cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study. , 1998, Cancer research.

[17]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  Determination of the replication error phenotype in human tumors without the requirement for matching normal DNA by analysis of mononucleotide repeat microsatellites , 1998, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[18]  R. Hamelin,et al.  Rapid and nonisotopic SSCP‐based analysis of the BAT‐26 mononucleotide repeat for identification of the replication error phenotype in human cancers , 1998, Human mutation.

[19]  R. Parsons,et al.  p53 alterations are associated with improved prognosis in distal colonic carcinomas. , 1997, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[20]  B. Iacopetta,et al.  A rapid and nonisotopic method for the screening and sequencing of p53 gene mutations in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors. , 1997, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[21]  M. Loda,et al.  Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter correlates with lack of expression of hMLH1 in sporadic colon tumors and mismatch repair-defective human tumor cell lines. , 1997, Cancer research.

[22]  G. Thomas,et al.  Inverse correlation between RER+ status and p53 mutation in colorectal cancer cell lines. , 1996, Oncogene.

[23]  T. Aas,et al.  Specific P53 mutations are associated with de novo resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer patients , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[24]  J. Benhattar,et al.  p53 mutations as a possible predictor of response to chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal carcinomas , 1996, International journal of cancer.

[25]  G. Demers,et al.  Inactivation of p53 enhances sensitivity to multiple chemotherapeutic agents. , 1996, Cancer research.

[26]  D. Smith,et al.  p53 point mutation and survival in colorectal cancer patients. , 1995, Cancer research.

[27]  C. Tangen,et al.  Fluorouracil plus Levamisole as Effective Adjuvant Therapy after Resection of Stage III Colon Carcinoma: A Final Report , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[28]  P. Workman To pop or not to pop: p53 as a critical modulator of tumour responsiveness to therapy in vivo? , 1995, Human & experimental toxicology.

[29]  D. Housman,et al.  p53 status and the efficacy of cancer therapy in vivo. , 1994, Science.

[30]  B. Iacopetta,et al.  Comparison of p53 gene mutation and protein overexpression in colorectal carcinomas. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[31]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  Clinical and pathological characteristics of sporadic colorectal carcinomas with DNA replication errors in microsatellite sequences. , 1994, The American journal of pathology.

[32]  G. Thomas,et al.  Relative efficiency of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and single strand conformation polymorphism in the detection of mutations in exons 5 to 8 of the p53 gene. , 1994, Oncogene.

[33]  G. Thomas,et al.  Association of p53 mutations with short survival in colorectal cancer. , 1994, Gastroenterology.

[34]  L. Aaltonen,et al.  Genomic instability in colorectal cancer: relationship to clinicopathological variables and family history. , 1993, Cancer research.

[35]  Darryl Shibata,et al.  Ubiquitous somatic mutations in simple repeated sequences reveal a new mechanism for colonic carcinogenesis , 1993, Nature.

[36]  J. Bufill,et al.  Colorectal cancer: evidence for distinct genetic categories based on proximal or distal tumor location. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[37]  A. Feinberg,et al.  MULTIPLE GENETIC ALTERATIONS IN DISTAL AND PROXIMAL COLORECTAL CANCER , 1989, The Lancet.